共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 390 毫秒
1.
一、对2006年高考英语试卷的总体分析 2006年全国高考英语学科共有19套试卷(其中全国卷3套,自主命题省市卷共16套),这些试题基本上体现了教育部对高考提出的"两个有利"的要求:一是有利于高校选择拔优秀学生;二是有利于中学的教学,达到"以考促改,以考促教"的目的. 相似文献
2.
3.
江西省高考英语已经第四次单独命题。2008年高考英语江西卷题型结构与2007年的英语试卷相同。本试卷更加体现了注重学生英语实际交际运用的能力。它比较客观、全面、科学地测试了考生的英语水平,有利于高等学校选拔人才,同时对中学英语教学的改革和即将到来的中学英语新课程标准的实施起到很好的反拨作用。 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
2011年的高考尘埃已经落定,上海高考英语试卷继承了以往几年对学生语言综合能力的考查,凸显出上海高考稳中求变,变中求新的本质。许多考生反映这次高考英语试卷"相当难",那么到底这次英语试卷考了什么?怎么考?难在哪里?对于今年的高三复习又有何启示呢?以下是对2011年上海高考英语试卷的整体评析及复习建议。 相似文献
7.
2014年国务院启动最新一轮全国高考综合改革,上海成为试点的两个省市之一。本文旨在研究本轮上海英语新高考听说测试的政策变化对高中英语教学所产生的反拨效应,主要采用问卷调查、访谈和课堂观察等方法,数据分析显示上海英语新高考在听说教学内容方面有较多积极的反拨效应,而在教学方法和教材使用方面则兼有正面与负面的反拨效应;新高考对高中不同年级、不同类别学校的师生群体带来的反拨效应存在较多差异性。 相似文献
8.
9.
一、两大目标
1.了解高考、适应高考。要搞清楚高考英语考什么(内容)?怎么考(考试形式、各题分值、试卷结构、考试时问、试卷特点)?如何应对(策略与方法)? 相似文献
10.
11.
景美霞 《伊犁教育学院学报》2006,19(4):140-144
试卷分析作为语言测试考后阶段的一项重要工作,对于提高考试质量、促进外语教学意义重大.在论述试卷分析重要性的基础上,详细介绍试卷分析方法和步骤,指出考生成绩分析和试卷质量分析是成绩分析的两大环节.外语教师应当通过科学详尽的试卷分析,改进命题工作、积累高质量题目、建立试题库,从而节约教学资源. 相似文献
12.
长期以来,我们总是参考现向过程的测试方向来测试利用面向对象技术开发的软件,效果并不理想,尤其是组装阶段的测试。因为类具有继承性(Inheritance)和多态(Polymorphism)/动态联编性(Dynamic binding),并不等于面向过程设计中的模块。因此,要取得更好的测试效果,只有找到与之相适应的面向对象的组装测试技术方可。 相似文献
13.
14.
This paper investigates the development of a spoken English test.The nature of speaking test and its design principles are first reviewed.Then the procedure of the test development is elaborated in detail,namely,design stage,construction stage and try out stage.The challenges facing the development of spoken test are finally discussed. 相似文献
15.
普通话水平测试的科学性和权威性取决于测试的质量。信度是评估语言测试质量的主要指标之一,试卷编制是语言测试信度的基础和保障。通过分析普通话水平测试试卷构成的要求,对各种题型的信度进行了较为深入细致的研究,对试卷编制中存在的问题提出了一些改进意见,旨在促进普通话水平测试工作健康有序开展。 相似文献
16.
文章通过对两相关样本作Wilcoxon检验和符号检验,对两独立样本作Mann-Whitney U检验和Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验研究了班级对学生成绩的影响,得到班级对学生成绩的影响高度显著。建议加强班风建设,以班风促学风,从而提高学生成绩。 相似文献
17.
William G. Harris 《Educational Measurement》2006,25(3):42-45
Some of the challenges that test publishers face in constructing educational assessments that meet high technical quality as prescribed in the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing ( AERA, APA, NCME, 1999 ) are examined. Federal educational initiatives are used to illustrate demands on technical quality that challenge the efforts of test publishers to adhere to the Standards . Possible pitfalls to avoid when updating the Standards are also discussed. 相似文献
18.
Keith A. Markus 《Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice》2016,23(2):252-267
Justification of testing practice involves moving from one state of knowledge about the test to another. Theories of test validity can (a) focus on the beginning of the process, (b) focus on the end or (c) encompass the entire process. Analyses of four case studies test and illustrate three claims: (a) restrictions on validity entail a supplement required to obtain justification from validity. (b) Rationales for restrictions assume particular contexts. (c) Claims can be translated between contrasting vocabularies. Implications for consumers of test validity theory include encouragement to focus on content instead of form and to write and read mindfully of the multiplicity of validity vocabularies. Implications for producers of test validity theory include encouragement to consider multiple reconstructions of a particular theory of test validity, clearly distinguish validity theories from validity definitions, and focus on contributing arguments that constrain possible theories rather than contributing definitions or broad frameworks. 相似文献
19.
李晨芳 《雁北师范学院学报》2005,21(6):31-32
针对当前英语教学中普遍存在的“聋哑”现象,为引起人们对英语口语的普遍重视.特设定口语测试的有效方法,进一步强调学生做好具有实用性的英语口语这一基本功的重要性。 相似文献
20.
G. Edward Miller 《Educational Measurement》2003,22(3):30-36
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 requires that states demonstrate a reduction in the test score minority gap over time but does not specify what methodology states must use to demonstrate this. The Act also requires that a measure of Adequate Yearly Progress be established by each state expressed in terms of the percent of students who achieve a level of "proficiency" on the state examination. While the most common methods used by states for analyzing the minority gap in test scores over time are percent achieving a performance standard, mean scale scores, and effect sizes, the default method for analyzing the minority gap will likely be the percent achieving proficiency. This article considers some of the practical issues involved in using the percent achieving a performance standard, mean scale scores, and effect sizes to analyze the minority gap using Texas student performance on their in-state assessment, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), and SAT. The intent of the article is to increase the understanding of policymakers and others on the issues of using the various statistics to analyze the minority gap. 相似文献