“情报”改名新论

“情报”改名新论石维彩Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：Ｔｈｅｆａｃｔｔｈａｔｔｈｅｔｅｒｍ＂ｉｎｔｇｌｌｉｇｅｎｃｅ＂ｉｓｒｅｐｌａｃｅｄｂｙｔｈｅｔｅｒｍ＂ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎ＂ｅｎｄｓｔｈｅｃｏｎｆｕｓｅｄａｎｄｖａｇｕｅｉｄｅａｓｏｆｔｈｅｉｒｔｈｅｏｒｅ...     

信息高速公路与我国图书馆发展策略

信息高速公路与我国图书馆发展策略邹志仁,陈雅Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：Ｔｈｅｃｏｎｃｅｐｔｓ,ｃｈａｒｒａｃｔｅｒｉｓｔｉｃｓ,ｐｒｅｓｅｎｔｄｅｖｅｌｏｐｍｅｎｔｓｉｔｕａｔｉｏｎｏｆｔｈｅ＂ｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎｓｕｐｅｒｈｉｇｈｗａｙ＂ｃａｒｒｉｅｄｏ...     

中文图书预订记录“沉淀”及其对策

中文图书预订记录“沉淀”及其对策顾阳Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：Ｔｈｅ＂ｓｅｄｉｍｅｎｔｓ＂ｏｆｔｈｅＣｈｉｎｅｓｅｂｏｏｋｓｕｂｓｃｒｉｐｔｉｏｎｒｅｃｏｒｄｕｓｕａｌｌｙｒｅｆｅｒｔｏ＂ｂｏｏｋａｒｒｉｖａｌｓｅｄｉｍｅｎｔｓ＂ａｎｄ＂ｂｏｏｋｆｌｏａｔｉ...     

信息高速公路、金桥与图书馆

信息高速公路、金桥与图书馆杨学梅,张大尧,崔明Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：Ｌｉｂｒａｒｙｉｓａｎｉｍｐｏｒｔａｎｔｃｏｍｐｏｎｅｎｔｐａｒｔｏｆｔｈｅ＂ＩｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎＥｘｐｒｅｓｓｗａｙ＂ａｎｄｔｈｅ＂ＧｏｌｄＢｒｉｄｇｅ＂ｐｒｏｊｅｃｔｓ．Ｆａｃｉｎ...     

中国图书馆学的跨学科研究

中国图书馆学的跨学科研究姜继Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：Ｔｈｏｕｇｈｔｈｅｔｅｒｍ＂ｉｎｔｅｒｄｉｓｃｉｐｌｉｎａｒｙｓｔｕｄｙ＂ｈａｓａｐｐｅａｒｅｄｉｎｔｈｅｓｔｕｄｙｏｆｌｉｂｒａｒｙｓｃｉｅｎｃｅｉｎＣｈｉｎａｓｏｍｅｗｈａｔｌａｔｅ，ｔｈｅｓｉｍｉｌ...     

我国图书馆学情报学期刊引文进展分析

我国图书馆学情报学期刊引文进展分析翟凤岐,张芝兰Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：Ａｆｔｅｒｉｎｖｅｓｔｉｇａｔｉｎｇ８ａｓｐｅｃｔｓｏｆｄａｔａｆｒｏｍ２０ｍａｇａｚｉｎｅｓ,ｓｕｃｈａｓｔｈｅ＂ＪｏｕｒｎａｌｏｆＬｉｂｒａｒｙＳｃｉｅｎｃｅｉｎＣｈｉｎａ＂ａｎｄ...     

《中国分类主题词表》的结构及功能评介

《中国分类主题词表》的结构及功能评介张强Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：Ｔｈｅ＂ＣｈｉｎｅｓｅＣｌａｓｓｉｆｉｅｄｓｕｂｊｅｃｔＴｈｅｓａｕｒｕｓ＂ｗｉｔｈｉｔｓｉｎｔｅｇｒａｔｉｏｎｏｆｃｌａｓｓｉｆｉｃａｔｉｏｎａｎｄｓｕｂｊｅｃｔｉｎｄｅｘｉｎｇｉｓＣｈｉｎ...     

日本《现代图书馆》剖析

日本《现代图书馆》剖析蔡捷，王永厚Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：Ｔｈｅｒｅａｒｅｎｏｗｉｎｊａｐａｎ８６ｔｉｔ．ｏｆｌｉｂｒａｒｙｓｃｉｅｎｃｅｐｅｒｉｏｄｉｃａｌｓ，ａｍｏｎｇｗｈｉｃｈｔｈｅ＂ＭｏｄｅｒｎＬｉｂｒａｒｉｅｓ＂ｉｓｃｏｍｐａｒａｔｉｖｅｌｙｔｈ...     

我国报纸信息数据库开发的现状与对策

我国报纸信息数据库开发的现状与对策宋明亮Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：Ｓｉｎｃｅ１９９０ｗｈｅｎｔｈｅ＂ＥｃｏｎｏｍｙＤａｉｌｙ＂ｓｅｔｕｐｔｈｅｆｉｒｓｔｎｅｗｓｐａｐｅｒｉｎｆｏｒｍａｔｉｏｎｄａｔａｂａｓｅｏｆｔｈｅｃｏｕｎｔｒｙ,１９ｏｆｔｈｅｋｉｎｄｈ...     

别开生面 独树一帜──对人大《复印报刊资料》的研究

别开生面独树一帜—对人大《复印报刊资料》的研究陶炼,张春梅,柯碧云Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：Ｔａｋｉｎｇｔｈｅ＂ＤｕｐｌｉｃａｔｉｏｎＭａｔｅｒｉａｌｓｏｆＮｅｗｓｐａｐｅｒｓａｎｄＰｅｒｉｏｄｉｃａｌｔｓ＂ａｓｔｈｅｍａｉｎｂｏｄｙ,ｔｈｅｐｕｂｌｉｃａｔ...     

《国际图联杂志》述评

《国际图联杂志》述评胡雅君，叶蓓蓓，赵丽莘Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：ＡＳｔａｔｉｓｔｉｃａｌａｎａｌｙｓｉｓｉｓｍａｄｅｆｏｒ３６２ａｒｔｉｃｌｅｓｐｕｂｉｓｈｅｄｉｎｔｈｅＪｏｕｒａｎａｌｆｒｏｍ１９８３ｔｏ１９９３．２０６７ｃｉｔａｔｉｏｎｓａｎｄｔｈｅ...     

Information sources in library and information science doctoral research

A citation analysis of 61 library science and information science dissertations revealed some interesting publication patterns. About 80% of the citations are to single authors, and as in analyses of periodical literature, males are cited more than females overall (about 61% to 39%). In dissertations related to school or public libraries, the male/female distribution is less disparate; for studies in academic or special libraries two thirds of the authors are male, and male authorship is 75% when only information science dissertations are analyzed. Journal articles are cited more than books, book chapters, proceedings, theses, and other formats with College & Research Libraries and Journal of the American Society for Information Science used most. Library and information science is impacted by several other disciplines, primarily education, computer science, health/medicine, psychology, communications, and business. Authors cited in dissertations represent a somewhat less parochial list in terms of citing U.S. publications than authors cited in studies analyzing journal citations; over half of all works cited were published within the last 10 years.     

《中国图书馆学报》被引调查与分析

《中国图书馆学报》被引调查与分析王惠翔Ａｂｓｔｒａｃｔ：Ｂａｓｅｄｏｎａｎｉｎｖｅｓｔｉｇａｔｉｏｎｏｆ２３７７６ｃｉｔａｔｉｏｎｓｏｆｌｉｂｒａｒｙｓｃｉｅｎｃｅｐｅｒｉｏｄｉｃａｌｓ,ｔｈｅ＂ＪｏｕｒｎａｌｏｆｔｈｅＬｉｂｒａｒｙＳｃｉｅｎｃｅｉ...     

Scatter and obsolescence of journals cited in theses and dissertations of librarianship

This article analyzes the bibliometric features (the number of pages, completion years, the fields of subject, the number of citations, and their distribution by types of sources and years) of 100 theses and dissertations completed at the Department of Librarianship of Hacettepe University between 1974 and 2002. Almost a quarter (24%) of all dissertations were on university libraries, followed by public libraries (9%). Doctoral dissertations were, on average, twice as long as master's theses and contained 2.5 times more citations. Monographs received more citations (50%) than journal articles did (42%). Recently completed theses and dissertations contained more citations to electronic publications. Fourteen (or 3.2% of all) journal titles (including Türk Kütüphaneciliği, College & Research Libraries, and Journal of the American Society for Information Science) received almost half (48.9%) of all citations. Eighty percent of journal titles were cited infrequently. No correlation was found between the frequency of citations of the most frequently cited journals and their impact factors. Cited journal titles in master's and doctoral theses and dissertations overlapped significantly. Similarly, journal titles cited in dissertations also overlapped significantly with those that were cited in the journal articles published in the professional literature. The distribution of citations to foreign journal titles fit Bradford's Law of Scattering. The mean half-life of all cited sources was 9 years. Sources cited in master's dissertations were relatively more current. Single authorship was the norm in cited resources. Coupled with in-library use data, findings of the present study can be used to identify the core journal titles in librarianship as well as to evaluate the existing library collections to decide which journal titles to keep, discard, or relegate to off-site storage areas.     

Decay and half-life period of online citations cited in open access journals

This study investigates the decay and half-life of online citations cited in four open access journals published between 2000 and 2009. A total of 1158 online citations cited in 1086 research articles published in two science and social science journals spanning a period of 10 years (2000–2009) were extracted. Study found that 24.58% (267 out of 1086) of articles had online citations and these articles contained a substantially very less number of online citations (2.98%) compared to previous study results. 30.56% (26% in Science and 52.73% in Social Science) of online citations were not accessible and remaining 69.44% of online citations were still accessible. The ‘HTTP 404 error message-page not found’ was the overwhelming message encountered and represented 67.79% of all HTTP message. Domains associated with .ac and .net had higher successful access rates while .org and .com/.co had lowest successful access rates. The half-life of online citations was computed to be approximately 11.5 years and 9.07 years in Science and Social science journal articles respectively.     

Decay and half-life period of online citations cited in open access journals

This study investigates the decay and half-life of online citations cited in four open access journals published between 2000 and 2009. A total of 1158 online citations cited in 1086 research articles published in two science and social science journals spanning a period of 10 years (2000–2009) were extracted. Study found that 24.58% (267 out of 1086) of articles had online citations and these articles contained a substantially very less number of online citations (2.98%) compared to previous study results. 30.56% (26% in Science and 52.73% in Social Science) of online citations were not accessible and remaining 69.44% of online citations were still accessible. The ‘HTTP 404 error message-page not found’ was the overwhelming message encountered and represented 67.79% of all HTTP message. Domains associated with .ac and .net had higher successful access rates while .org and .com/.co had lowest successful access rates. The half-life of online citations was computed to be approximately 11.5 years and 9.07 years in Science and Social science journal articles respectively.     

The Journal of Ayub Medical College: a 10-year bibliometric study

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a bibliometric evaluation of the Journal of Ayub Medical College (JAMC), Abbottabad, Pakistan. Methods: The data of articles, citations and authors of JAMC from 1997 to 2006 were collected and analysed in terms of bibliometric parameters. RESULTS: The number of articles published per year ranges between 27 and 97; most of the articles (47.2%) have 11-20 citations. Three-author contributions ranked the highest (134; 23.43%); the most prolific authors contributed seven articles; 295 (51.57%) of the authors are geographically affiliated to the North West Frontier Province (NWFP), Pakistan; the most popular subject is Internal Medicine; journal self-cited references are 43; 7769 (77.94%) of the citations were from foreign journals; the most productive institution is Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad, Pakistan. CONCLUSION: The number of papers published in JAMC per issue has been increasing over the last 10 years, and the core region is NWFP, Pakistan. Original articles are the main type of papers for this journal. The publication is open for all fields of medical sciences.     

Mapping the literature of dental assisting.

The purpose of this study was to identify core journals and the databases that provide access to these journals for the field of dental assisting. This study was completed as a part of the Medical Library Association (MLA) Nursing and Allied Health Resources Section's project to map the literature of allied health. There were three original journals selected for analysis using the prescribed methodology, Dental Assistant, the journal of the American Dental Assistants Association; Journal of the CDAA, the journal of the Canadian Dental Assistants' Association; and Dental Teamwork, published by the American Dental Association. Dental Teamwork ceased publication in December 1996; however, it was considered a necessary part of the analysis due to its extensive coverage of dental assisting as well as its numerous scientific articles with references. In Dental Assistant, there were 16 source articles, containing 206 citations. In Dental Teamwork, there were 31 source articles with 308 citations. In Journal of the CDAA, there were only 3 source articles with 14 citations. Bradford's Law of Scattering was applied to the journal citations. Four databases, MEDLINE, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica, and HEALTH were analyzed for their coverage of these cited journals. This study may encourage the dental assisting profession to take a close look at its existing journals and to consider enhancing the content of these journals or the publication of additional journals in the field. Dental assistants of today need substantive literature that deals with all aspects of their chosen profession in order to meet the challenges of providing dental health care in the future.     

Authorship outlets of academic health sciences librarians.

Journal articles are the most common publication format for U.S. academic health sciences librarians. This is consistent with the findings of other researchers. Of the total publications in this study, 68% were in journals. Watson found that 69% of the academic librarians' publications were published in some type of journal [8]. Similarly, Yerkey and Glogowski found that 67% of the publications in their study were journal articles, although their population consisted of all types of authors of library/information science materials [9]. Both the present study and Watson found that monographs were the second most common publication outlet. Watson found that 16% of the total publications were monographs; the current study identified 14.8% of the total publications as monographs [10]. Although Watson's findings are similar to the newer results, it is important to note that Watson's study was conducted in a different manner and included book reviews, which were not counted in the present study. The health sciences librarians in the present study published more than two thirds of their articles in library/information science journals and 27% in health sciences journals. Similarly, in Yerkey and Glogowski's study, the second-largest number of library/information science articles appeared in medical and health sciences journals [11]. Fang also found that 22.57% of the journal articles on health sciences librarianship or by health sciences librarians were in medical journals [12. This seems to demonstrate the desire of health sciences librarians to communicate with the health professionals. Yerkey and Glogowski that library and information science is an interdisciplinary field, "borrowing and supplying information to and from other disciplines"[13].     

Application of the Rasch model to measuring the impact of scientific journals

This paper focuses on a fresh and fair way to determine a ranking of science journals according to the “number of citations-to and articles published,” data used by SCI Journal Citation Reports of ISI to determine journal ranking by “impact factor.” Impact is considered a latent variable defined by a set of items (citations and articles published). The theoretical background is Item Response Theory, which suggests that, if we can understand how each item in a set of items operates with an object, then we can estimate a measure for the object. The Rasch model is the most common formulation of that theory. This technique is here applied to the citations and articles published of 62 medical journals (objects) to provide a Rasch measure for these journals which is compared with the current “impact factor” computation.