核心力量训练在高尔夫教学中的试验研究

以青岛职业技术学院高尔夫专业16名学生作为研究对象,随机将其分为试验组和对照组两组,对试验组进行专项核心力量训练,然后对比两组的高尔夫技术成绩,分析核心力量训练对高尔夫技术的影响程度。结果显示,试验组的击球距离和稳定性明显高于对照组,可见核心力量训练对高尔夫运动练习者运动水平提高具有重要的作用。     

高尔夫回归奥运会后的影响及其中国发展策略

大众参与的普及性和高度的产业化、职业化是现代高尔夫发展的两个主要特征。基于这种理解,运用文献资料法和逻辑分析法,回顾了高尔夫历经百年回归奥运的历程,分析了高尔夫回归奥运对于中国高尔夫发展的双面意义,提出高尔夫运动的发展策略:大众高尔夫运动必须根据中国现有国情进行高尔夫球场和高尔夫项目本土化改造,发展高尔夫的群众体育社团,加强高尔夫文化宣传,提高大众参与程度;职业高尔夫运动必须改革现行的高尔夫行政管理机构和后备人才培养体系,以俱乐部模式大力推行高尔夫职业化,鼓励职业高尔夫运动员单飞等。     

捶丸及高尔夫演变发展轨迹原因之分析

运用文献资料法和逻辑分析法,对捶丸和高尔夫演变发展轨迹原因进行研究。捶丸和高尔夫运动极为相似,捶丸在宋元明曾出现全盛时期,却没有发展到现在,这与中国清朝统治者在治国策略上奉行中国传统文化的理性主义有直接的关系。然而捶丸却没有像高尔夫发展成为贵族运动,主要是高尔夫以西方文化为底蕴和统治者的支持。本文将依据相关资料进行探讨,为我们了解高尔夫和捶丸的演变发展轨迹提供理论基础。     

地域环境视域下成都市高尔夫运动的发展路径研究

运用文献资料法、问卷调查法、数理统计法、专家访谈法和逻辑分析法等,对具有独特地域和人文环境资源禀赋的成都市高尔夫运动的现状进行分析,结果表明:绝大部分成都市民的参与意识还比较淡薄;高尔夫俱乐部的收费情况与成都市民的消费情况之间存在一定的差距;成都大部分市民平时参与锻炼的时间有限;成都高尔夫运动的发展情况不容乐观等。据此提出成都市高尔夫运动的发展路径。     

国家级特色专业社会体育（高尔夫运动与管理）学生实习工作的特点与启示

在介绍国家级特色专业——湖南涉外经济学院社会体育（高尔夫运动与管理）专业概况的基础上,总结了该专业学生实习工作的特征,主要有：实习时间较长,劳动强度较大;实习形式灵活多样;实行轮岗制;实习期间即可实现基本就业等.分析了实习前的准备与安排、实习中的组织与监管、实习后的考核与评价3个阶段的工作内容及特点.     

论我国高尔夫教育培养目标及发展前景

对我国高尔夫教育培养的目标及发展前景做详实的分析研究,目前我国高尔夫培养目标应着眼于多样化发展,依托学校自身的合理定位选择适合的教学模式以促进我国高尔夫专业人才的培养。     

Physical activity for health

Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to examine the stressors experienced by injured athletes during three phases of their recovery from sport injury, and (b) to explore the differences in the stressors experienced by team as compared to individual-sport athletes. Participants comprised previously injured high-level rugby union players (n = 5) and golfers (n = 5). Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the stressors participants experienced during three phases of injury (onset, rehabilitation and return to competitive sport). Within- and cross-case analyses showed that athletes experienced sport, medical/physical, social and financial stressors. There were a number of differences in the stressors experienced across the three phases and between team and individual-sport athletes. Findings have important implications for the design and implementation of interventions aimed at managing the potentially stressful sport injury experience and facilitating injured athletes' return to competitive sport.     

Taxonomy of golf putting: Do different golf putting techniques exist?

Abstract

This study is a preliminary investigation into the use of cluster analysis to determine if different putting techniques existed in a group of club level golfers.

Putting at a hole 4?m away, the performances of 34 experienced golfers (age 55.3?±?17.8 years and handicap 15.3?±?6.9, range 3–27) were analysed using putter head kinematic and centre of pressure data. Two distinct putting techniques were identified (named as Arm putting and Body putting), this being the first time different putting techniques have been reported in the research literature. These techniques were defined by parameters related solely to movement of the centre of pressure along the line of the putt. Some players (17 of 34) moved between techniques when performing their putting trials. Neither technique produced more accurate putt results (P?=?0.783).

Putting technique was further analysed after grouping players according to handicap (similar skill level) or accuracy (similar putting performance). The lack of significant findings when players were re-analysed according to handicap or accuracy highlights the importance of the correct methodological approach to detecting technique differences.     

The X-Factor: An evaluation of common methods used to analyse major inter-segment kinematics during the golf swing

Abstract

A common biomechanical feature of a golf swing, described in various ways in the literature, is the interaction between the thorax and pelvis, often termed the X-Factor. There is no consistent method used within golf biomechanics literature however to calculate these segment interactions. The purpose of this study was to examine X-factor data calculated using three reported methods in order to determine the similarity or otherwise of the data calculated using each method. A twelve-camera three-dimensional motion capture system was used to capture the driver swings of 19 participants and a subject specific three-dimensional biomechanical model was created with the position and orientation of each model estimated using a global optimisation algorithm. Comparison of the X-Factor methods showed significant differences for events during the swing (P < 0.05). Data for each kinematic measure were derived as a times series for all three methods and regression analysis of these data showed that whilst one method could be successfully mapped to another, the mappings between methods are subject dependent (P <0.05). Findings suggest that a consistent methodology considering the X-Factor from a joint angle approach is most insightful in describing a golf swing.     

The effects of perceived and received support on objective performance outcome

Abstract

In this study, we examined the main and stress-buffering effects of perceived and received support on objective performance outcome. The sample consisted of 123 British male high-performance golfers with a mean age of 25.3 years (s=5.4). Participants completed measures of perceived support, stressors, stress, and received support before competitions. After the competitions, performance outcome (number of shots) was recorded. When the two types of support were considered separately, there were significant main effects for perceived (ΔR ²=0.08, b=?0.81, P<0.01) and received support (ΔR ²=0.05, b=?0.68, P<0.01) on performance. There were also significant stress-buffering effects for perceived (ΔR ²=0.03, b=?0.48, P=0.02) and received support (ΔR ²=0.06, b=?0.61, P<0.01). When both types of support were considered together, the significant main effect (ΔR ²=0.09, P<0.01) was primarily attributable to perceived support (b=?0.63, P=0.02). The significant stress-buffering effect (ΔR ²=0.06, P=0.01) was primarily attributable to received support (b=?0.56, P=0.04). These results demonstrate the beneficial influence of social support on performance. The findings highlight the need to recognize the distinction between perceived and received support, both in terms of theory and the design of social support interventions with athletes.