波普尔科学分界问题评析

波普尔对科学分界问题做出了与传统理论截然不同的回答，即以可证伪性作为科学与非科学的分界标准，不落传统巢臼，富有启发意义：打破了科学无误论的神话；为我们如何解决从易错的科学理论趋近真理，如何解决假真、错对的过渡问题提供了新的视角。同时，这一分界标准也有很多偏颇之处：他把科学理论的可证伪性推向了极端；证伪标准具有明显的经验主义倾向；他的证伪标准不仅无法对科学理论进行定论性的证伪，而且还有可能会扼杀许多真正的科学理论。

A Critical Analysis of k.Kopper's Theory of Distinghishing Science from Non-science

Giving an answer to the question of dividing science is quite different from that of the traditional theories, that is to say, to take the feature of proving fallacy as the criterion to separate science from non-science, It conformed to no conventional pattern and was full of inspiration. It broke the myth that science has no fallacy at all and provides us with a new visual angle to do with the problem of approaching to truth from fallacious scientific theories and the problem of the transition from false to truth as the transition from wrong to right. Meanwhile the dividing criterion has many partial opinions; he put the feature of proving fallacy of science to extreme; the criterion to prove fallacy has an apparent tendency of empiricism; his criterion was not able to make final conclusion as to prov -ing fallacy of scientific theories, What's more, it is most likely to stifle true scientific theories.