领导行为与作风的本土领导科学研究成果综述

对中国本土领导科学中领导行为和领导作风的研究成果进行综述。通过综述认为，20世纪的中国管理心理学关于领导行为和领导作风的研究，要么停留在西方管理心理学的介绍和跨文化验证方面，要么就是以西方文化为背景，对中国古代儒家道家文化背景下形成的治国治家思想视而不见。而与此同时，中国共产党领导的组织人事部门和政策研究部门的学者却创立了有强烈政治针对性的本土化的领导科学。由于文化和政治差异，其话语与学院派的管理心理学差异比较大。学院派的管理心理学充斥着大量的带有港台特色的西方文化概念，而党和政府派的领导科学却完全按照党的历史和现实执政要求，按照党的历届领袖人物的领导理论和话语来建设自己的领导科学。因此，笔者认为，当代中国有两种领导科学，一种是以西方管理心理学为框架的领导科学，一种以党的理论为框架的领导科学，两种领导科学就像两条铁轨，难以相交，主要的障碍在于话语的转换困难。许多学者做了许多尝试，都以失败告终。所以说，心理学的本土化道路仍然很漫长。

A Review of the Resreaches on Leading Behavior and Leading Style in Indigenous Leadership Psychology

Through the review on the leading behavior and leading style of indigenous leadership science in china and referred to the results of modern managerial psychology in west,we consider that in 20th century,the researches on leading behavior and leading style rested on the introduction and cross-culture validation of west managerial psychology,or criticized that the Chinese enterprisers didn't have the modern managerial psychological system based on background of west culture,but did not see the leadership science,namely the thoughts of managing country and family based on Chinese ancient Confucianism and Taoism culture.At the same time,the scholars in the personnel department and policy department led by the CCP had founded indigenous leadership science aiming at polity.Due to the differences of culture and polity,its discourses are different from the managerial psychology of academism.The managerial psychology of academism flood with the features of Hong Kong and Taiwan.However,CCP'S leadership science of politics were built up not only according to the history and reality of the party,but also according to the leadership theory of the chiefs completely.So the author thinks that there are two kinds of leadership science in china,one is the leadership science based on west managerial psychology,the other is the leadership science based on the political theory of the CCP.It seems as two rails for west managerial psychology and Chinese leading science,they will not intersect for ever,The primary obstacle is the transform of discourses.Many people attempted it but failed.There is a long way to the indigenization of psychology.