| 明代法政体制述论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘长江.明代法政体制述论[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2005,32(6):109-114. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘长江 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 达县师范高等专科学校,科研处,四川,达州,635000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 四川省哲学社会科学研究2004年度“十五”规划重点项目“中国封建法政体制研究”（编号：SA04-043）. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 中国封建法政体制至明代臻于完善。明朝中央司法机关正式以三法司相称，司法审判中，实行刑部审理、大理寺复核、都察院监督的三法司会审制度。这实质上是一种权力的制约，旨在防止刑部独揽审判权。而在实际运作过程中，司法权受到皇权、后妃勋戚及行政长官等的掣肘，尤其是明中后期厂卫的干扰，致使法政体制遭到严重破坏，导致“明代大案多枉”。
|
| 关 键 词： | 三法司 皇权 厂卫 后妃勋戚 行政长官 体制 明代 述论 司法机关 司法审判 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5315（2005）06-0109-06 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-06-15 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年6月15日 |
About Legal System of Ming Dynasty |
| |
| LIU Chang-jiang.About Legal System of Ming Dynasty[J].Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Science Edition),2005,32(6):109-114. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Chang-jiang |
| |
| Institution: | Scientific Research Office, Daxian Higher Normal School, Dazhou, Sichuan 635000, China |
| |
| Abstract: | China's feudal legal system arrives at perfection in the Ming Dynasty.The Ming central judicial institutions are formally named as three interdependent judicial departments and during a trail practise the joint-trial system of Xingbu hearing,Dalisi reviewing and Duchayuan supervising.This is actually a kind of power restriction for the purpose of preventing the Xingbu from monopolizing judicial power.But in the actual operating progress,the judicial power is impeded by the imperial power,the queen and the honoured noble relatives and administrators,especially the interference of Changwei in later-middle Ming,which cause the legal system suffer great damage and lead to the many serious wrong cases in the Ming Dynasty. |
| |
| Keywords: | three interdependent judicial departments joint trial power restriction imperial power |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
