首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论无人驾驶汽车交通事故侵权责任
引用本文:杜明强,冷传莉.论无人驾驶汽车交通事故侵权责任[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020(2):129-139.
作者姓名:杜明强  冷传莉
作者单位:贵州大学法学院
基金项目:贵州省科技计划项目([2018]20024);司法部2018年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目(18SFB2040)。
摘    要:在无人驾驶领域,依靠数据+算法支撑的智能系统将全权替代人类驾驶行为,无人驾驶汽车也因此具备高度"自主性"。其所引发交通事故侵权致损时,至少在责任主体认定、二元归责原则适用和责任类型划分等方面给现行侵权法提出挑战。而赋予无人驾驶汽车独立法律人格既与法理不符,也难应对司法实践。故我国侵权法宜通过确立三元归责原则体系(过错+无过错+公平责任),建构"产品责任+机动车交通事故责任"相结合的适用规则,并以建立无人驾驶汽车责任强制保险为配套机制的进路加以应对。

关 键 词:无人驾驶汽车  法律人格  归责原则  交通事故责任

On Traffic Accidents Tort Liabilities of Driverless Vehicles
DU Ming-qiang,LENG Chuan-li.On Traffic Accidents Tort Liabilities of Driverless Vehicles[J].Journal of Anhui Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2020(2):129-139.
Authors:DU Ming-qiang  LENG Chuan-li
Institution:(School of Law,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China)
Abstract:In the unmanned driving filed,the intelligent system supported by data and algorithm’s combination will completely replace human’s driving behavior and full autonomous vehicles also have highly"autonomy". When a traffic accident caused by driverless vehicles infringes on the rights of others,it will at least challenge the current tort law’s following aspects,including the identification of subject of liability,the application of the principle of the fault and no-fault imputation,and the division of the liability’s types. However,giving driverless vehicles independent legal personality is inconsistent with legal principles and difficult to deal with the judicial practice. Therefore,China’s tort law should establish the ternary imputation principle system(fault + no-fault + fair liability),construct the applicable rules combining"product liability + motor vehicle traffic accident liability",and establish the compulsory liability insurance for driverless vehicles.
Keywords:driverless vehicles  legal personality  the principle of imputation  traffic accident liability
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号