论体育行业自治与司法管辖

体育行业自治依历史沿革和法律授权而论具有其合理性,然而,由于时下的竞技体育纷争充斥了复杂的社会学、经济学与伦理学等多类别元素,非常态对抗时有发生。当多类别争端成为主基调时,纠纷的解决过程就必然会脱离恒定的样式并与现有的规则形成冲突,这样,便使原有的解纷模式在实践中暴露出与国际体育组织初衷相背离的成分。通过对国际惯例与相关法律在解决纠纷时所生成的多种对峙情形的分析,从三个方面提出了优化行业自治与司法管辖的路径。

Discussion on the Sports Industry Autonomy and Jurisdiction

The autonomy of the sports industry in accordance with the historical evolution and legal authorization has its rationality.However,current competitive sports dispute flooded the complex sociology,economics and ethics category element,the unusual confrontation occurs frequently.When the multi-class dispute becomes the main keynote,dispute resolution process is bound from the style of the constant,and conflicts with the existing rules.In this way,the original resolution mode in practice exposes the composition deviated from the original intention of international sports organizations.This paper,through analysis the international practice and law in settling disputes generated by a variety of confrontation situations,put forwards the way of optimized industry self-government and jurisdiction from the three aspects.