PPBS in higher education planning and management: Part I,an overview |
| |
Authors: | George B. Weathersby Frederick E. Balderston |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Office of Analytical Studies, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA;(2) Center for Research in Management Science, USA;(3) University of California, Berkeley, California, USA |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() Higher education in the United States and elsewhere is beset by crises: crises of public confidence, questions of continuing relevance, doubts about continuing the emphasis on doctoral instruction, and a very real financial crisis. In response, governing boards and governmental agencies are devoting increasing attention to the management of higher education. Part of this response has been a heightened interest in formal planning-programming-budgeting-systems (PPBS); in fact, several states have legislated the adoption of PPBS for higher educational planning and decision making. Similar interest has been evidenced in other countries. Therefore, it is an appropriate time to reconsider the nature and role of PPBS and its potential impact on higher education. This paper describes the salient characteristics of PPBS and traces the development of PPBS and related analytical techniques in governmental agencies and institutions of higher education. A second paper will illustrate both the concepts and the implementation of PPBS by a detailed exposition of the University of California's experience with PPBS. Finally, in a third paper we suggest an alternative view of policy analysis for educational planning which is a departure from traditional PPBS. We conclude with general observations and specific recommendations to educational managers seeking to improve their resource allocation procedures. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|