首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中英文语言学书评介入资源对比研究
引用本文:倪红艳,刘韶方.中英文语言学书评介入资源对比研究[J].柳州职业技术学院学报,2009,9(4):83-87.
作者姓名:倪红艳  刘韶方
作者单位:1. 南通大学,外国语学院,江苏,南通,226019
2. 中国矿业大学,外国语言文化学院,江苏,徐州,221008
摘    要:运用评价理论介入子系统对中英语言学学术书评展开人际意义的对比研究,在对144篇书评的评价部分进行介入资源的标注和归类统计后发现:中文书评作者在评论时偏向于使用闭合资源来凸显权威姿态,而英文评论者则更多的使用开放资源来体现他们对读者声音的更多的兼容。

关 键 词:语言学书评  多声  介入子系统

A Contrastive Study of Engagement Resources in English and Chinese Linguistics Book Reviews
NI Hong-yan,LIu Shao-fang.A Contrastive Study of Engagement Resources in English and Chinese Linguistics Book Reviews[J].Journal of Liuzhou Vocational & Technical College,2009,9(4):83-87.
Authors:NI Hong-yan  LIu Shao-fang
Institution:1. School of Foreign Studies, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, China; 2. School of Foreign Studies, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China)
Abstract:This paper attempts to conduct a contrastive study of English and Chinese linguistics book reviews in terms of engagement in the framework of appraisal theory.After identifying different types of engagement resources,it is found that the Chinese linguistic book reviewers voices are more likely to compress " the other" voices and claim authoritative stances in their evaluation,while their English counterparts tend to make more allowances for dialogically alternative voices in this genre.
Keywords:linguistics book reviews  multi-voices  engagement
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号