首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

对死刑裁判现行宣判模式的思考
引用本文:彭剑鸣.对死刑裁判现行宣判模式的思考[J].遵义师范学院学报,2005,7(6):15-17,19.
作者姓名:彭剑鸣
作者单位:贵州警官职业学院,法律二系,贵州,贵阳,550005
摘    要:死刑裁判目前的宣判模式具有对社会宣判的迟延性,对罪犯宣判的相对公开性,时辩护人、代理人宣布的滞后性,死刑裁判宣布与执行的一致性的特点.死刑裁判现行宣判模式具有思想基础,以及人们时裁判宣判模式的价值存在认识偏差的基础,它具有经济价值与社会价值.但是,过分强调社会公共利益而忽视了个人利益,悖于刑事诉讼法所规定的公开审判制度、死刑执行犹豫制度,阻断了司法中的法文化交流,使司法活动失去了监督.进而提出明确规定死刑裁判宣判的方式,明确规定死刑裁判宣判与执行的时间间隔,明确规定罪犯亲属及辩护人、人民检察院异议的审查程序.

关 键 词:死刑裁判  宣判模式  批判
文章编号:1009-3583(2005)06-0015-03
收稿时间:2005-10-08
修稿时间:2005年10月8日

Thought on the Present Pattern of Pronouncing the Judgment of Death Penalty
PENG Jian-ming.Thought on the Present Pattern of Pronouncing the Judgment of Death Penalty[J].Journal of Zunyi Normal College,2005,7(6):15-17,19.
Authors:PENG Jian-ming
Abstract:The present pattern of pronouncing the judgment of death penalty has such characteristics as delay in pronouncing to the society, relative openness in pronouncing to the criminal,hysteresis in pronouncing to the defender and agent and consistency o pronouncing and ex-ecuring.It has ideological foundation and the foundation that there exists deviation for people to realize the value of the pattern of pronouncing the judgment.It possesses both economic and social values.But it overemphasizes social public benifit,overlooks personal benifit,goes a-gainst the open adjudication system and irresolute death penalty executing system stipulated in the criminal procedural law,blocks the exchange of law culture in judicature and makes the judicial activity lose supervision.Moreover,this article proposes to assign clearly the pattern of pronouncing the judgment of death penalty,the time interval between pronouncing and executing and the examination procedure of the objection of the criminal's relative,defender and the people's procuratorate.
Keywords:judgment of death penalty  pattern of pronouncing  criticize
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号