严羽《诗辩》文本顺序问题补议

《沧浪诗话》今传"通行本"与"玉屑本"两种版本,其中《诗辩》的文本顺序存在较大差异。文章在综述已有研究成果的基础上,进一步就《诗辩》的文本顺序问题提出四点补论:其一,《沧浪诗话》原非"诗话体"著作,《诗辩》当为"辩"体论说文,而《诗人玉屑》作为诗话著作摘录《诗辩》,并不承担保存其原貌的责任;其二,若依"玉屑本",则《诗辩》开篇即蹈袭北宋《潜溪诗眼》旧话;其三,从两个"识"字可以看出被"玉屑本"腰斩为两段的文字原本存在紧密的逻辑承接关系,且"通行本"在行文脉络上更加明晰;其四,论法论品相关文字或为"通行本"编校者据"玉屑本"补入,是以此两段文字依"玉屑本"当更为合理。

On the Text Order of Yan Yu's Discussion of Poetry

There exist two editions of Cang Lang''s Comments on Poets and Poetry:the popular edition and the Yuxie edition. The text orders of Discussion of Poetry, the first volume of Cang Lang''s Comments on Poets and Poetry, are quite different from each other in the two editions. Based on the relevant works of former scholars,the author of this paper puts forward 4 propositions:first,Cang Lang''s Comments on Poets and Poetry was not poetry originally, Discussion of Poetry was written in an argumentative style and Shiren Yuxie, a book of poetry review, had some poems taken from Discussion of Poetry; second,in the Yuxie edition, Discussion of Poetry imitated the style of Qianxi Shiyan,a book of poetry review written in the North Song Dynasty; third,in the Yuxie edition, a logical connection can be found between the two editions which were separated by the two words of "shi", and the text of the popular edition has a more reasonable essay structure than the Yuxie edition; fourth,essays on writing techniques and taste in the popular edition might have been added to the Yuxie edition by the editor of the book, and these essays are in accordance with the style of Yuxie edition.