首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

关于侵占罪认定的主要争议问题探析
引用本文:姚春艳.关于侵占罪认定的主要争议问题探析[J].柳州职业技术学院学报,2004,4(3):17-20.
作者姓名:姚春艳
作者单位:零陵学院法律系,湖南,零陵,425006
摘    要:自1997年刑法增设侵占罪的规定以来,对于侵占罪的认定在法学界和司法界一直存有争议。本文对于侵占罪认定的两个主要方面,即对侵占罪的犯罪对象的认定和对侵占行为的认定,作了具体的分析和阐述。在侵占罪的犯罪对象方面界定了何为“代为保管的他人财物”和“他人的遗忘物或者埋藏物”;在侵占行为的认定方面主要界定了“合法持有”,“非法占有”,“拒不退还”或“拒不交出”等行为。

关 键 词:保管  遗忘物  埋藏物  拒不退还  拒不交出
文章编号:1671-1084(2004)03-0017-04
修稿时间:2004年3月5日

Analysis on the Main Disputes of the Seizing Offense Affirmation
YAO Chun-yan.Analysis on the Main Disputes of the Seizing Offense Affirmation[J].Journal of Liuzhou Vocational & Technical College,2004,4(3):17-20.
Authors:YAO Chun-yan
Abstract:Since the seizing offense was added in penal code in 1997, its affirmation has had disputes in the law and judicial circle. This article makes a specific analysis and expatiation on two main aspects: 1. affirm the crime object of seizing offense; 2.affirm the seizing behavior. In the crime object of seizing offense, it defines what is "others' properties looked after instead" and "others' leftover or buried thing"; in the affirmation of seizing behavior , it defines "hold legally," "occupy illegally," "refuse not to send back," or "refuse not to hand over," and so on.
Keywords:control  leftover  buried thing  refuse to send back  refuse to hand over
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号