首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

学术史书写的若干学理问题探略
引用本文:姚晓南,王玉燕.学术史书写的若干学理问题探略[J].广东教育学院学报,2006,26(1):31-34.
作者姓名:姚晓南  王玉燕
作者单位:广东教育学院中文系,广东广州510303
基金项目:广东省社会科学基金;广东普通高校社会科学基金
摘    要:学术史研究在世纪之交繁盛一时,至今不衰,是中国当代学术研究更为深广的阐释诉求所致。学术史研究是从历史的角度看待学术,体现的是叙事者的话语建构。学术史研究应避免唯尊学术而排斥社会、政治因素的偏向。学科发展史的研究应成为当代学术史书写的一个范式。学术史研究对于一门学科的厘定有着非常重要的意义。实证与史识、全面与客观,是学术史书写的基本原则。研究主体的学养是一种生命境界,与学术史书写状态息息相关。

关 键 词:学术史  研究之研究  范式  学科  学养
文章编号:1007-8754(2006)01-0031-04
修稿时间:2005年11月30

A Probe into the Problems of Scientific Theory in the Writing of Academic History
YAO Xiao-nan,WANG Yu-yan.A Probe into the Problems of Scientific Theory in the Writing of Academic History[J].Journal of Guangdong Education Institute,2006,26(1):31-34.
Authors:YAO Xiao-nan  WANG Yu-yan
Institution:Dept. of Chinese, Guangdong Education Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510303, P. R. China
Abstract:The research on academic history has been flourishing since the turn of the century, which indicates the profound demand of interpretation of the contemporary Chinese academic research. The research of academic history involves the evaluation of academy in view of history and the display of the discourse construction of the narrators. The research on academic history should avoid the tendency of doing research for its own sake, excluding society and the element of politics. That of the scientific development should serve as a mode of the writing of contemporary academic history, which is significant for the establishment of a specific subject. Substantial evidence and the understanding of history, comprehensiveness and objectivity are the principles for the writing of academic history. The academic ability of the research subject is an indication of state of life and is closely related to the state of the writing of academic history.
Keywords:academic history  research for its own sake  mode  subject  academic ability
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号