Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus on-pumpcoronary artery bypass grafting: which is better in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

INTRODUCTION Conventional coronary artery bypass graftin(CCABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) habeen accepted as an effective and safe treatment fomulti-vessel coronary heat disease. CPB may stilcontribute to the operation field because of threlatively easier technical requirement; but it alscauses a serious systematic inflammatory reactiowhich will lead to dysfunction of important organand higher cost for the patients. Off-pump coronarartery bypass grafting (OPCABG) has r…

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: which is better in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

To evaluate the clinic outcome of off-pump coronary bypass grafting (OPCABG) of patients with coronary heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, we collected and analyzed 1998?2002 data on 28 patients with these two diseases who had received off-pump coronary bypass operation in our hospital, and compared with data on those who also had the same two diseases but received on-pump coronary artery bypass at same time. There were no operation-related death; one died of respiratory failure 14 days after operation while staying in hospital; there were more respiratory complications in the conventional coronary artery bypass grafting group (CCABG) than in the OPCABG group; and the PaO2/FiO2 in the CCABG group was higher than that in the OPCABG group during operation because of CPB, but lower than that in the OPCABG group 6?12 hours after operation. OPCABG seemed more suitable than CCABG for coronary artery disease patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to less damage to their oxygen-exchange capability and the fewer respiratory complications.