首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

法院与当事人的取证权之争——以台湾诉讼模式改革前后为观察视野
引用本文:林科诨.法院与当事人的取证权之争——以台湾诉讼模式改革前后为观察视野[J].黔南民族师范学院学报,2011,31(4):48-53.
作者姓名:林科诨
作者单位:中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京海淀,100088
摘    要:基于当事人主义优于职权主义以及由当事人掌握取证权更易查清事实真相这样的认识,台湾于2002年通过对"刑事诉讼法"第163条的修改将其诉讼模式转变为"改良式当事人主义"。但其实刑事诉讼的目的并不在于查清事实真相,而在于解决纠纷。审判所需要查清的事实真相程度,必须用"当事人主义标尺"和各方真诚的努力这两个因素加以衡量。因而由法院及当事人共同分担取证权则好于任何一方对此的独占。

关 键 词:诉讼模式  取证权  诉讼目的  事实真相

Fighting for the Right of Investigation between Court and Parties- Using the Situation around the Revolution of Trial Procedure in Taiwan as the Field of View
LIN Kehun.Fighting for the Right of Investigation between Court and Parties- Using the Situation around the Revolution of Trial Procedure in Taiwan as the Field of View[J].Journal of Qiannan Normal College of Nationalities,2011,31(4):48-53.
Authors:LIN Kehun
Institution:LIN Kehun(Criminal Justice School.,China University of Political Science and Law,Haidian 100088,China)
Abstract:Based on the cognition that party-domination model is better than the inquisitorial model and the parties bearing the investigation duty are easier to find the truth than the court,Taiwan switched its trial procedure from an inquisitorial model to a party-domination one by amending the 163rd of Law of criminal procedure in 2002.The real aim of the criminal procedure,however,is not to find the truth,but to resolve the dispute.The degree of truth of fact which the court needs to clear has to be measured thro...
Keywords:trial procedure model  right of investigation  the aim of trial procedure  truth of fact  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号