公民宪法基本权利司法救济之比较研究

公民宪法基本权利可以通过依宪法原则制定的法律来具体化，从而获得间接的司法救济。但在宪法基本权利没有被具体化为法律权利，或者法律规定与宪法基本权利相抵触的情况下，应当如何为宪法中的公民基本权利寻求司法救济途径呢？针对这两种情况，不少国家根据本国的国情建立了较为完善的宪法基本权利司法救济制度。本文比较了美国与德国在模式选择、具体制度上的异同，并简单的说明了我国可以从中借鉴的因素。

The Investigation of Compares between the Judicial Remedies of Constitutional Basic Rights

Constitutional basic rights of citizen can gain indirect judicial remedies by making laws according to the constitutional principles. But when this is not the case, or the provisions in the law are contradictory to the constitutional basic rights, how can we remedy the rights Some countries have established comparative consummate judicial remedy systems for constitutional basic rights. The author compares the mode selection, idiographic systems between United States and Germany, and then explains the factors we can use for reference.