首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论罢工立法的必要性及其路径
引用本文:沈广明.论罢工立法的必要性及其路径[J].连云港职业技术学院学报,2014(1):14-18.
作者姓名:沈广明
作者单位:华东政法大学,上海200042
摘    要:从罢工行为本质看,它是劳动者争取必要生活资料和剩余价值权的一种经济手段,是历史发展的必然产物,有立法规范必要。从罢工的权利属性看,罢工权作为一项基本人权,属于劳动权范畴,保障罢工权须立法转化为实然权利,维持权力与权利的平衡也需要将罢工权用法律的“笼子”规制。从现行法层面看,国内法对罢工规制的不到位以及国际法赋予我国罢工立法的义务再一次肯定罢工立法必要性。当下,首先由地方立法,后上升为国家立法,时机成熟后再考虑转化为公民基本权利是符合国情的立法路径。

关 键 词:罢工  经济手段  基本人权  立法路径

Necessity and Path on Strike Legislation
Institution:SHEN Guang- ruing (East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)
Abstract:The strike action in nature is an economic means for labors to fight for living necessities and rights of surplus value and the inevitable product of historical development as well, so it is necessary to make a law to regulate it. The strike rights, as one of the basic human rights, belongs to the category of labor rights. To safeguard the rights, a law shall be made to change then into the actual rights, and to maintain the balance between the power and the right. From the perspective of current laws, the domestic law lacks in management but the international law entrusts the obligation on strike legislation. At present, the local law shall first be made, then the national law. When the time is right, the right will be considered the basic right of citizens. It will be the legal path in line with national conditions.
Keywords:strike  economic means  basic human rights  legislative path
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号