苏辙《春秋集解》以史传经初探

北宋《春秋》学以争论褒贬、臧否义例为主潮，滔滔汩汩，席卷天下之际，苏辙《春秋集解》特出其间，以矫俗规过为著书旨趣，极力诋斥孙复诸家“以意说经”之穿凿钩深。家学、庭训、地域文化与学风世俗之激荡触发，于是蔚为苏辙《春秋集解》以训诂为书法，事义兼采而又归本于“以史传经”之特色。本文考其特色大抵有三：一、解读《春秋》，专主《左传》叙事；二、据史为断，批驳“以意说经”；三、事据《左传》，义兼《公》《谷》；权衡诸家，发挥经旨隐微。此种透过考据事实，以得书法之治经风格，于北宋揣度义例、执着褒贬之《春秋》学研究主潮中，真堪为沧海横流之中流砥柱。

The Tentative Research on the Way of Teaching Confucian Canon through History in Su Zhe's Collected Commentaries on The Spring and Autumn Annals

In the study of The Spring and Autumn Annals,the scholars in the Northern Song Dynasty focused on quarrelling about right and wrong,and judging the main purpose and style.Beyond plenty of studies,Su Zhe's Collected Commentaries on The Spring and Autumn Annals changed traditional opinions and corrected mistakes.The book refuted the strained interpretation of "talking about Confucian canon by meanings".The collision between the knowledge learned in his family and the instructions from the higher authorities,between the regional culture and traditional style of study,promoted Su Zhe to write Collected Commentaries on The Spring and Autumn Annals with textual exegesis and comments both on the facts and the purpose,in the way of teaching Confucian canon through history.The three features of the book were:1.interpreting The Spring and Autumn Annals and focusing on the narration of Zuo Zhuan;2.judging from historical facts and refuted the style of "talking about Confucian canon by meanings";3.consulting different theories to tell the essential of Confucian canon.His research method became a mainstay of academic community at the time.