首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

暂缓判决制度之质疑
引用本文:谌远知.暂缓判决制度之质疑[J].广播电视大学学报,2005(4):54-56.
作者姓名:谌远知
作者单位:浙江广播电视大学,浙江,杭州,310000
摘    要:从适用对象的角度对审判实践中总结出的暂缓判决适用对象进行分析和推导,得出暂缓判决没有合适的适用范围存在.从法理的角度对暂缓判决的适用对象进行分析,发现暂缓判决适用对象与缓刑的适用对象一致,两者产生竞合.缓刑是刑法中明文规定的制度,在审判实践中通常会被优先适用,由此也印证了审判实践中暂缓判决的尴尬处境.

关 键 词:暂缓判决  缓刑  审判实践  适用对象
文章编号:1008-0597(2005)04-0054-03
收稿时间:2005-08-20
修稿时间:2005年8月20日

Question the Suspend Judgment System
ZHAN Yuan-zhi.Question the Suspend Judgment System[J].Journal of TV University(Philosophy & Social Sciences),2005(4):54-56.
Authors:ZHAN Yuan-zhi
Abstract:From the angle of applicable object, analyzing and deducing the applicable object of suspend judgments summed up in judicial practice, no corresponding applicable object range is to be found. So does from the angle of legal principle, no difference in applicable object between suspend judgment and probation. Being an official system proclaimed in Criminal Law, the probation system is given the priority in practice, thus the awkward position of suspend judgment is confirmed.
Keywords:Suspend judgment system  Probation system  The Judicial practice  Applicable object
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号