| 关于"不可言说者"的言说 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 于圣维,南鸿雁.关于"不可言说者"的言说[J].广播电视大学学报,2002(1):107-110. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 于圣维 南鸿雁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 内蒙古广播电视大学,内蒙古呼和浩特,010051
2. 天津音乐学院,天津,300171 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对于"不可言说者",路德维希·维特根斯坦和加达默尔有完全不同的理解,但他们都似乎没有冲破语言学的樊篱.中国的释、道两家相关论述给了我们有益的启发,现代科学的理论成果也为我们的哲学思考提供了客观根据.我们认为,对于外在世界,语言不可能有完全确切的表述和理解.
|
| 关 键 词： | 不可言说者 测不准原则 语境 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-0597(2002)01-0107-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年5月20日 |
On "What We Cannot Speak about" |
| |
| YU Sheng-wei ,NAN Hong-yan.On "What We Cannot Speak about"[J].Journal of TV University(Philosophy & Social Sciences),2002(1):107-110. |
| |
| Authors: | YU Sheng-wei NAN Hong-yan |
| |
| Institution: | YU Sheng-wei 1,NAN Hong-yan 2 |
| |
| Abstract: | As to "what we cannot speak about", Ludwig Wittgenstein's understanding differs from Hans-George Gadamer's entirely. Nevertheless, both of them seem not to be free of the cage of linguistics. The Chinese relevant principles of Buddhism and Daoism offer us helpful enlightenment, while the modern scientific theories provide projective evidences for our philosophical thinking. In terms of the languages in outer world, it is thought there are no complete and exact statement and comprehension. |
| |
| Keywords: | What we cannot speak about Uncertainty principle Context |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
