首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

我国民事诉讼举证时限制度探析
引用本文:蒋陆军,李晓琦.我国民事诉讼举证时限制度探析[J].内江师范学院学报,2006,21(1):40-43.
作者姓名:蒋陆军  李晓琦
作者单位:西南政法大学,重庆,400031
摘    要:举证时限是诉讼当事人是否承担不利裁判风险的一个重要分界线。现在意义上的举证时限概念,可追溯至历史上的法定顺序主义和随时提出主义。目前大多数国家都相继确立了证据适时提出主义,我国也经历了由证据随时提出主义向证据适时提出主义的转变。但是,由《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》所确立的举证时限制度对具体制度和规则的设计,仍然存在矛盾和缺陷,同时,期望通过司法解释来构筑完整的举证时限制度本身也有失常理,我国目前并不系统的举证时限制度急切需要通过立法来加以完善。

关 键 词:民事诉讼  举证时限  证据失权  证据交换
文章编号:1671-1785(2006)01-0040-04
收稿时间:2005-06-01
修稿时间:2005年6月1日

The Discussion on System of Limitation of Adducing Evidence in Civil Action in China
JIANG Lu-jun,LI Xiao-qi.The Discussion on System of Limitation of Adducing Evidence in Civil Action in China[J].Journal of Neijiang Teachers College,2006,21(1):40-43.
Authors:JIANG Lu-jun  LI Xiao-qi
Abstract:Limitation of adducing evidence plays an important role in deciding whether the litigants should bear the risk of unfair decision.The conception of limitation of adducing evidence can be tracked back to the theory of adducing evidence in statutory order and the theory of adducing evidence at any time,but for the defects of the two doctrines,most countries are inclined to adduce evidence in proper time.In the similar manner,limitation of adducing evidence in our country also gets its theory changed from adducing evidence at any time to adducing evidence in proper time.However,there are several contradictions and defects in the system of limitation of adducing evidence constructed by the several Provisions on Evidence in Civil Proceedings Enacted by the Supreme People's Court.Furthermore,establishing the whole system of limitation of adducing evidence by judicial interpretations is abnormal,so the unperfect system of limitation of adducing evidence in recent China need to be consummated by legislation urgently.
Keywords:limitation of adducing evidence  invalidation of evidence  exchange of evidence  new evidence
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号