| 操作思维的项目差异及类属理论建构 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘改成.操作思维的项目差异及类属理论建构[J].天津体育学院学报,2011,26(4):290-296. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘改成 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广州医学院体育教研室，广东广州510182 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 为考察不同运动项目操作思维的类属差异，以新研发的《BTL- SW- V1.2 操作思维测试软件》对来自不同项群共10 个项目的304 名高水平
运动员进行测试。研究显示，所测10 个运动项目，具有显著操作思维类属差异。根据操作思维能力的高低，构建运动项目的操作思维类属理论，
其中，乒乓球、羽毛球、曲棍球和跆拳道为一类，称之为高操作思维类；赛艇、游泳、体操、武术（套路）、射击（步枪）和举重为一类，称之为低操作思
维类，前一类显著优于后一类，即操作步数少、操作反应快且操作思维学习能力强。
|
| 关 键 词： | 操作思维 项目差异 操作思维Vincent 学习曲线 操作思维学习递进系数 |
Events Differences of Operational Thinking and Construction of Its Classification Theory |
| |
| LIU Gaicheng.Events Differences of Operational Thinking and Construction of Its Classification Theory[J].Journal of Tianjin Institute of Physical Education,2011,26(4):290-296. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Gaicheng |
| |
| Institution: | LIU Gaicheng(Section of PE,Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 510182,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The operational thinking testing software of BTL-SW-V1.2,newly-published,was used as the research tool.The categorical differences of operational thinking between sport events were examined.304 elite athletes from 10 sports events were chosen as subjects.The main conclusion revealed the categorical differences of operational thinking between the sport events were significant.According to the abilities of operational thinking,10 sports events could be divided into two categories: one was called High Operatio... |
| |
| Keywords: | operational thinking events differences Vincent learning curve of operational thinking progressive coefficient of operational thinking learning |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《天津体育学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《天津体育学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
