履行和解浅议

一般情况下履行和解不具有独立性与可诉性,因其表现形式不同,性质认定上及效力上有差别:对于没有约定诉讼权利义务的履行和解,只有实际履行才能产生对抗执行与消灭实际权利义务的法律效力;对于约定诉讼权利义务的履行和解,其从本质上属诉讼契约.对于此类履行和解,若一方违反程序性约定,启动或放弃某项诉讼程序,应首先审查双方关于实体部分之合意是否切实履行,若已履行,应认定该行为不合法而否决其效力;若并未合理履行,则该违反程序约定之行为并非无效

A Brief Discussion of Fulfilling Reconciliation

Generally speaking, to fulfill reconciliation does not have independence and justiciability, whose manifes tations and natures are different. To fulfill reconciliation, if without agreement on the right and obligation of litiga tion, only when the fulfillment actually happens, otherwise, it will not produce any legal effect. If there is an agree ment, reconciliation fulfillment, by nature, is litigation contract. If one party is in breach of procedural agreement, initiating or giving up a procedure, the court shall firstly review whether the convention of substantial part has been earnestly fulfilled. If fulfilled, the judicial act shall not be valid and effective, or else it does not act invalid.