混合式评审及其学术效果评析——以《经济研究》杂志为例

目的]探讨混合式评审是否是期刊论文的较为理想的评审方式。方法]分析《经济研究》杂志近21年论文引用数据的阶段性差异来比较不同评审方式的效果。结果]从月平均引用量和前30%高引用文章占总引用比例两个指标来看,混合式评审对于《经济研究》杂志而言优于匿名评审和公开评审。结论]需要以实证数据为依据,进一步探讨何种评审方式最有利于学术发展。

Analyzing the effectiveness of different reviewing methods for the economic research journal

Purposes] This study aims at analyzing if a mixture of anonymous and open reviewing is the best way for academic journal reviewing. Methods] The citation data of the top Chinese journal Economic Research Journal for the past 21 years were used to make comparisons. Findings] The result shows that for the Economic Research Journal, a mixture of anonymous and open reviewing is better than any of the two alone. Conclusions] Further studies are needed to find out which reviewing method is the ultimate best for academic journals.