首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

19世纪中日两国早期现代化比较研究
引用本文:张海鹏.19世纪中日两国早期现代化比较研究[J].徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,38(4):81-87.
作者姓名:张海鹏
作者单位:中国社会科学院近代史研究所,北京100006;山东大学历史系,山东济南250100
摘    要:中国和日本两国大体上在19世纪60-90年代先后迈出了早期现代化的步伐,而两国发展的结局却大不相同。日本的维新是由天皇为首的明治政府主动在全国推行,明治政府为了集中政府权力,成立了专门负责引进、移植和发展资本主义企业的中央机构。这些中央机构,都以"激进改革派"人士执掌。而中国只是由地方上的几个大员,包括曾国藩、李鸿章、左宗棠以及其他对洋务有兴趣的总督或者巡抚在他们的辖区办理。洋务新政时期,未能建立任何一个推动资本主义改革、引进西方学术和技术以及机器设备的专门机构,没有一个机构来设计、制定有关推动洋务新政的方针政策。在发展资本主义企业的方向上,中日之间也有着本质的区别。在中国,洋务新政初期引进的军事工业,全部是官办,此后开设的民用工业项目,大多是官督商办,民办企业极难生长。清政府没有提出促进民营企业的任何政策。日本则实行了两个并举:引进资本主义企业与引进资本主义经济制度并举,举办官办企业与鼓励民营企业并举。尽管两国都具有早期现代化的特征,但与真正的现代化进程相比较,尚有距离。洋务新政与明治维新,实际上是不同历史发展阶段上的产物,难以作真切的比较。明治维新以后,明治政府逐渐采取一系列政策措施,对日本社会进行了资本主义改造,这些改造刺激了日本社会自由民权运动的发生,推动了日本社会向资产阶级宪政国家的转变,从而促进了日本产业政策向自由资本主义方向转换。这个转换,标志着日本资本主义社会的形成。可见,落后国家只有转换国家体制,才可能全力推进资本主义的产业政策和文化政策,才可能赶上现代化的潮流,而中国在19世纪内完全不具备这样的条件,所以只能在半殖民地半封建社会的泥淖中越陷越深,在现代化的道路上很难迈出大的步伐。

关 键 词:洋务运动  明治维新  早期现代化

The Comparisons of the Early Modernization in China and Japan during the 19th Century
ZHANG Hai-peng.The Comparisons of the Early Modernization in China and Japan during the 19th Century[J].Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2012,38(4):81-87.
Authors:ZHANG Hai-peng
Institution:ZHANG Hai-peng(The Institute of Modern History,The Chinese Academy of Social Science,Beijing 100006,China)
Abstract:The two countries China and Japan both took the step of early modernization during the 19th century,but the results of their development were quite different.Japan’s Restoration was promoted in the whole country by Meiji Government headed by Mikato,and in order to concentrate the government power,the Mdiji Government established the central department in charge of introducing,transforming and developing capitalist enterprises.But in China,this affair was managed by several local top officials including Zen Guofan,Li Hongzhang,Zuo Zhongtang and some other officials who were interested in westernization.In the period of westernization,no special department was established to promote capitalist reform,western technique and mechanical equipments introduction.In the development of capitalist enterprises,there was essence difference between China and Japan.In China,the introduced military industries in the Westernization were run by the governments,and the most civil industries in the late period were also run by the officials.The Qing Government did not give any policy to promote enterprises run by the local people.Japan adopted two measures,they introduced capitalist enterprises and also introduced capitalist economical system,and the enterprises run by the officials and the ones run by the local people were promoted together.
Keywords:Westernization Movement  Meiji Restoration  early modernization
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号