首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

《文选》的选录标准复议
引用本文:邵宗波,常佩雨.《文选》的选录标准复议[J].许昌学院学报,2007,26(3):59-61.
作者姓名:邵宗波  常佩雨
作者单位:郑州大学,文学院,河南,郑州,450001
摘    要:《文选序》分三个层次阐说了怎样对待《文选》的选录标准问题:首先,要区分“选录范围”和“选录标准”这两个不同的概念;其次,分析“事出于沉思,义归乎翰藻”这句话不是在说《文选》的选录标准;第三,应将萧统本人的文学观与《文选》的实际选录标准区别开来;从萧统的其他作品、甚而至于从其他人的作品中“找寻”出一个所谓的《文选》的“选录标准”也是不妥的。讨论《文选》的选录标准,较稳妥的方法是从《文选》文本出发,仔细分析每一篇作品的性质、文体特征、艺术特色,从而归纳、概括出《文选》实际的选录标准。

关 键 词:<文选>  <文选序>  选录标准  选录范围
文章编号:1671-9824(2007)03-0059-03
收稿时间:2006-03-20
修稿时间:2006-03-20

Reconsideration of the selecting criteria of Selected Works
SHAO Zong-bo,CHANG Pei-yu.Reconsideration of the selecting criteria of Selected Works[J].Journal of Xuchang University,2007,26(3):59-61.
Authors:SHAO Zong-bo  CHANG Pei-yu
Institution:School of Literature, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
Abstract:Preface to Selected Works discusses how to deal with the selecting criteria of Selected Works from three aspects:first,it is essential to distinguish between the two different concepts of "selecting area" and "selecting criteria";second,analysis of shi chu yu chen si and yi gui yu han zao's not refering to selecting criteria;third,it is necessary to distinguish between Xiao Tong's literary points of view and actual selecting criteria and it is improper to search for the so-called selecting criteria of Selected Works from other works of Xiao Tong and even the works of other people.It is a more reliable way to discuss the selecting criteria of Selected Works by proceeding from text and carefully analyzing the nature,features of each work in order to sum up the real selecting criteria.
Keywords:Preface to Selected Works  Selected Works  selecting criteria  selecting area
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号