| 刘勰论楚辞二题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 米晓燕.刘勰论楚辞二题[J].丹东师专学报,2010(6):107-110. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 米晓燕 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]辽宁师范大学文学院,辽宁大连116029 [2]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部全国高等院校古籍整理委员会资助项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 从文体学的角度看,刘勰《文心雕龙.辨骚》篇具有特殊的意义。它第一次将＂骚＂单列为一种文体,萧统的文学观显然受到刘勰的影响。《昭明文选》按文体编排,将＂骚＂单列,在＂赋＂、＂诗＂之后,位居第三。《辨骚》篇中由于刘勰的宗经思想带来了理论上的矛盾,并对楚文化及战国文化对楚辞的作用论述不足。
|
| 关 键 词： | 刘勰 《文心雕龙》 楚辞 《文选》 宗经思想 楚文化 |
Some Comments on Liu Xie’sBian Sao （辨骚） in The Literary Mind and Carving of Dragons （文心雕龙） |
| |
| MI Xiao-yan.Some Comments on Liu Xie’sBian Sao （辨骚） in The Literary Mind and Carving of Dragons （文心雕龙）[J].Journal of Dandong Teachers College,2010(6):107-110. |
| |
| Authors: | MI Xiao-yan |
| |
| Institution: | MI Xiao-yan,(1.College of Literature,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116029,China;2.College of Literature,Guangxi Normal University,Guilin 541004,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | In perspective of stylistics,Liu Xie’s article ofBian Sao（辨骚） in The Literary Mind and Carving ofDragons （文心雕龙） has special significance.It listed Saoas a literary style for the first time.Xiao Tong’s liter ary outlook is remarkably in fluenced by Liu Xie.In his Zhaoming Wenxuan （昭明文选）,articles were arranged in order of style.Saoworks was independently arranged in the third place afterFuand poem.Due to Liu Xie’s idea of learning from the classics,theoretical contradictions exists inBian Sao （辨骚）.The function of Chu culture and culture of Warring States is insufficiently discussed. |
| |
| Keywords: | Liu Xie The Literary Mind and Carving of Dragons （文心雕龙） Chu Ci Zhaoming Wenxuan （昭明文选） idea of learning from the classics Chu culture |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
