质疑刑法中的"第三种行为形式"

在英国刑法中持有从形式上看是状态,这并不表明我国刑法中持有也是独立于作为与不作为之外的状态。在英国,持有犯罪在制定法上多为严格责任犯罪;在我国,刑法中的持有是主客观统一原则之下的持有,两者并不完全相同。从逻辑、行为表现、行为结构、(立法)功能、立法司法价值以及义务的特定性上看,持有也不是独立的第三种行为形式。实际上,它是一个可以用作为或者不作为评价的概念。

Doubt on "the Third Conduct" in Criminal Law

Possession is state of affair in England and Wales criminal law,however,it doesn't mean that possession in our criminal law is also an independent conduct which is different from act and omission.In England and Wales criminal law,possession crimes in statues mostly are strict liability crime,while the possession crimes in our criminal law are under the authority of combination of subject and object principle,the two are different.From logic,form of conduct,structure of conduct,legislation function,judicial value and the definite of duty,possession is not an independent third conduct.In fact,it is a term which belongs to act or omission.