| 外国教育史博士学位论文研究方法量化分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李素敏米志旭. 外国教育史博士学位论文研究方法量化分析[J]. 宁波大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 0(4): 97-104 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李素敏米志旭 |
| |
| 作者单位： | (天津师范大学 教育学部,天津 300387 ) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以中国知网博士学位论文数据库2011-2020年收录的73篇外国教育史博士学位论文为研究样本，通过系统梳理描述了所选样本在研究方法方面的应用现状，总结出样本在研究方法应用方面表现出的特征与不足:研究方法在应用方面存在不规范、传统的思辨研究占据研究方法的主流以及方法与研究问题难于达到适切。对此，应加强博士研究生研究方法方面的训练；教育史研究过程中要兼具思辨与实证研究方法；以科学精神涵养研究者选用适切研究方法的能力。
|
| 关 键 词： | 外国教育史 博士学位论文 研究方法 量化分析 |
Quantitative Analysis of Method Designs of Doctoral Dissertations in the History of Foreign Education |
| |
| LI Su-min,MI Zhi-xu. Quantitative Analysis of Method Designs of Doctoral Dissertations in the History of Foreign Education[J]. Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition), 2022, 0(4): 97-104 |
| |
| Authors: | LI Su-min MI Zhi-xu |
| |
| Affiliation: | (School of Education, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | This study sampled 73 doctoral dissertations on the history of foreign education in the CNKI doctoral dissertation database from 2011 to 2020 to examine the status of the method designs , the characteristics, as well asthe deficiencies such as irregularities in the application of methods, traditional speculative research as the mainstream method, and inappropriate question-specific methods. It thus recommended that doctoral students should be well trained in speculative and empirical methods , and scientific design of appropriate methodology in studies on the educational history. |
| |
| Keywords: | history of foreign education doctoral dissertation research methods quantitative analysis |
|
| 点击此处可从《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
