高职院校教师发展性评价探析

高职院校应立足高职办学目标和特点,制定适应高职院校发展的教师评价体系。发展性教师评价为高职教师评价体系的建立提供了新的视角。本文从高职院校教师评价现状出发,结合发展性评价的理念和特点,提出了发展性评价在高职教师评价过程中的应用对策和建议。     

试论高职院校发展性教师评价机制的构建

文章在界定高职院校发展性教师评价内涵的基础上,提出了高职院校发展性教师评价机制的构建原则、基本理念及构建思路。     

高职院校教学质量考核评价标准的制定方法

高职院校教学质量考核评价标准是高职院校教学质量评价的重要依据。为加强教学质量管理,建立科学的教学质量考核评价体系,以客观公正的方式评价教师的教学工作质量,引导教师不断提高教学水平,推动教育教学改革并提高教学质量。根据高职院校教师教学工作实际情况,提出制定教学质量考核评价标准的若干思路。     

发展性评价视域下的高职院校教师考核评价机制

发展性评价是以促进教师专业发展为根本目的的一种评价方式。文章在分析高职院校教师考核评价机制存在问题的基础上,提出了发展性视域下完善高职院校教师考核评价机制的策略。     

高职院校教师教学质量评价指标体系探讨与实践

高职院校教师教学质量评价的目的是提高高职院校教师教学质量,评价原则和评价体系应对调控和改进教师工作具有较强激励促进作用。本文主要对高职院校教师教学质量评价体系的构建及组织实施进行了相关的分析探讨。     

关于高职院校实施发展性教师评价方式的思考

介绍现行的教师评价方式,分析目前高职院校教师评价的现状,阐述发展性教师评价方式的优越性,探讨高职院校实施发展性教师评价方式的基本策略。     

高职院校教师绩效评价体系的构建

根据高职院校的特点,提出了教师绩效评价体系的构建原则;高职院校教师绩效评价的内容包括基本素质、专业水平、教学能力、工作成果四个方面。在此基础上,构建了高职院校教师绩效评价指标体系、评价标准与评价办法。     

高职院校科研论文评价体系研究与探索

科研论文是高职院校教师科研成果的主要类型.文章对高职院校教师的科研论文情况进行分析,阐述科研论文评价体系的概念及构建目的与原则,通过建立高职院校科研论文评价机制,并开发出适合高职院校科研论文评价指标体系,以期实现对高职院校科研管理的创新与完善.     

人的全面发展视域下高职院校教师评价改革论析

马克思人的全面发展理论是高职院校教师评价改革的重要遵循,教师评价改革需要满足人的基本物质需求、教师评价改革需要促进人的劳动能力提升、教师评价改革需要推动人的社会关系进步。促进教师全面发展是高职院校教师评价改革重要且必要的价值取向,良法善治的高职院校教师评价体系必然有利于促进教师的全面发展。高职院校需要结合自身实际着力构建促进教师全面发展的教师评价体系,在评价标准上,将学校事业发展与个人全面发展相结合;在评价方法上,将分类定量评价与分层定性评价相结合;在评价理念上,将人文关怀精神与多元专业思维相结合;在评价单元上,将个体业绩评价与团队业绩评价相结合;在结果运用上,将落实奖励惩罚与加强沟通反馈相结合,推动教师评价从“指挥棒”向“推进器”转换,助力学校事业高质量发展和教师全面发展。     

高职院校教师评价理念初探

高职院校应基于高职教育的特色,研讨高职院校教师评价的对象、主体、内容与策略,为开展教师评价提供科学合理的理念支撑。     

Student perception of instructors: the effect of age,gender and political leaning

Abstract

Students were asked to rank instructors, who differed by age, gender and political leaning, by their expected helpfulness, and how much a student expected to learn. Students selected older instructors as those from whom they would learn the most, but chose young instructors as the most helpful. Overall, male instructors were preferred over female instructors, especially when emphasis was placed on learning. The political leaning of the instructor was a discriminating factor in humanities classes, with liberal instructors preferred over conservatives. The preferred age, gender and political leaning patterns were distinctly different for instructors who were helpful, and from those from whom students thought they would learn the most, indicating a dichotomy between perceived helpfulness and learning. The stereotypic images of instructors did not differ significantly by the students’ own gender and academic major, except for male students ranking conservative instructors higher than females. Students do have stereotypical images of instructors based on the instructor’s age, gender and political leaning.     

科学发展观视野下学生评教的思考

从科学发展观的视野关照学生评教,不难发现,目前各校盛行的学生评教在一定程度上危及教学质量,危害诚信教育,干扰日常管理,影响师生关系,阻碍教学改革。为了教学的可持续发展,探讨学生评教的合理性,改善现行的学生评教实属必要。     

Online teaching competencies in observational rubrics: what are institutions evaluating?

Evaluation of online instructors is a developing field of research. Institutions have made great progress in recent years to refine their efforts to evaluate online teaching in order to improve online teaching. Some institutions, however, still struggle to evaluate online instructors who did not design the course they are teaching. The purpose of this study was to identify some of the most important observable teaching behaviors identified in evaluation rubrics and how these compare to established online teaching competencies. Findings indicate that there is a growing consensus of what are the most important, observable teaching behaviors, and that this can help improve existing models of online teaching competencies.     

高校辅导员工作的考核与激励机制

分析目前辅导员考核与激励机制中存在的问题,从辅导员的实际要求出发,提出建立科学合理的考核与激励机制的设想。     

高等学校人文学科类课程内容更新机制研究

课程内容更新是现代大学课程建设的一项重要内容。人文学科类课程内容更新有其必要性．更有其特殊性。课程主讲教师必须加强课程内容更新的意识建构,研究课程内容更新的方法途径。课程内容更新既要遵循学科自身发展的内在规律,又要建立促使教师主动更新的外在约束机制。     

Assessment and Evaluation in Social Work Education: Formative and Summative Approaches

Despite a wealth of tacit knowledge in academia regarding effective teaching strategies and a rich theoretical and empirical knowledge base on student learning, social work instructors wishing to identify appropriate ways to measure teaching and learning have little evidence to guide them. This article presents a framework for assessment of student learning and evaluation of instructor teaching that distinguishes between formative methods, which support an ongoing process of improvement, and summative methods, which represent a measure of competence or mastery. While summative methods are often used to meet institutional or programmatic goals, formative methods bridge assessment and evaluation and can result in a more reflective, constructive, and productive experience for both instructors and students.     

论现代远程教育系统的交互

在远程教育中，交互性是决定教育质量的一个重要因素，交互活动直接影响着远程课程的学习效果。现代远程教学模式以现代通信网络为支撑平台，是一种以交互式为中心的自学习模式，它是未来教学模式的主流。交互方式的选择与应用，是进行远程教育课程教学设计的关键组成部分，需要教育工作和课件开发的共同参与和设计。交互技术飞速发展，新技术的出现与应用推动了远程教育的交互方式的变革和交互性的加强。对远程教育活动的交互性评价是衡量远程教育过程质量的一个重要方面，可以从教育的社会本质、教育效果和教育目标、课件、教育和学习等多方面进行评价分析。     

基于高校教师分类发展的考评模型设计

我国高校尤其是新建本科院校中青年教师数量较大,并且其工作有教学、科研、社会服务、艺术创作等不同方向的侧重,因此教师的考核与发展应该体现分类原则,促进教师特色发展,在擅长的领域内发挥特长。但是,目前高校中的教师考核机制与办法却不能发挥促进教师分类发展的导向作用,因此从时间、考评人员、考评项目等维度对教师工作进行考评,帮助教师寻找差距、发现特长,是一种适合教师分类发展的新型考评模型。     

The effects of feedback from students to university instructors: An experimental study

This article reports the results of an experimental study of the effects of students' evaluative feedback to university instructors. Data obtained indicated that feedback from students did not have any significant effects on the instructors' teaching performance and their perception of teaching. Some limitations of the study are discussed with suggestions for further exploration of the problem.     

Student ratings and various instructional variables from a within-instructor perspective

The relationship between class size, instructional method, course level, reason for enrollment, and student ratings of instruction was assessed from a within-instructor perspective. Two hundred fifty-four pairs of courses taught by the same instructor were correspondingly identified and subjected to a stepwise multiple regression procedure. Only class size was found to be a significant predictor of ratings once individual differences between instructors were controlled, hence underlining the importance of (1) taking cognizance of the size of the course when using student ratings of instructors as a measure of teaching effectiveness, and (2) controlling for systematic variation due to instructor idiosyncracies in instructional research.