论社会公共领域在治理经济领域矛盾冲突中的独特作用

推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化,需要社会力量的理性参与。在治理经济领域矛盾的过程中,社会公共领域能够发挥其独特作用——通过动用独立个人、社团组织、公共传媒以及社会活动力量并运用社会舆论和公共性活动等机制,对利益集团的自利行为和国家权力的不当行使予以干预,从而实现对公民个人经济利益的有效保护,起到调解处理经济领域社会矛盾的作用。     

网络公共领域:现代公民社会建构的契机

公民社会是在国家和社会分离的基础上,建立在市场经济之上,由公共领域、社会组织和现代公民为主体所构成的法制社会。理想的社会结构为国家、市场、公民社会三者相互独立、平等、协作。当前我国的社会组织面临着许多障碍。本文在分析哈贝马斯公共领域及公民社会理论的基础上,指出只有在自由、平等、开放、批判基础上的网络公共领域,才是理想公共领域和现代公民社会建构的契机,才能更好地发挥政府、市场、公民社会的功能,进而分析了网络公共领域的特点和功能,以及当前我国网络公共领域所面临的问题。     

公民资格与公共治理——基于公共领域的展望

公民资格是政治学的核心概念,公民资格理论可以为公共治理提供理论支撑和实践支持.公民资格和公共治理都与公民参与相关,在公共领域的场域空间内,公民的积极参与可以为公共治理提供主体支持,可以实现多元利益表达和公共利益表达相结合,可以增强公民之闻的合作和对共同体的认同.公民积极参与治理,有利于实现公共治理的善治.     

英国妇女与资本主义公共领域的建构

18世纪以来,随着英国资本主义经济的发展,新兴资产阶级努力建构与国家公共权力领域相对应的公共领域,实现商品交换和社会劳动领域的私人化,以维护自身的利益,并进一步发现和创造着市民社会的公共利益,让人们获得“公共人格“。在这一过程中,处于社会边缘地位的妇女能动地发挥着自己的作用,为资本主义公共领域的建构做出了积极的贡献。     

从社会控制走向公共治理

分析了“社会稳定过敏症”带来的六大弊端。提出了将以往的社会控制转变为公共治理,赋权于民的措施和方法,强调建立公共服务型政府是关键。     

公共领域与小康社会

健康的公共领域是现代社会的重要标志。在全面实现小康社会的进程中,我们要主动培育和发展公共领域,以加速实现中国社会的全面现代化。 (一)公共领域是现代社会的重要标志。公共领域属于现代市民社会的一个不可或缺的环节,是由各种非官方的组织或机构构成的社会文化生活领域。我们知道,任何人类社会都是经济、政治、文化系统的有机统一体,文化在社会整体中有着不可取代的职能。这些职能主要表现为:在     

网络公共领域的成长

网络公共空间继承了传统公共领域的理性与批判精神,以零壁垒、无边界、广覆盖、去中心、大众化的特质创新了人际的交往行为和交往秩序,引领了公共领域的结构转型。网络技术的变革实现了公共领域的权力转移,一种扁平化的虚拟组织结构为公民参与和行动博弈提供了重要的交流和交往平台。在以公共议题为导向的网络公共领域,政治系统的输入和输出走向可能的常规化和实用化。从本体论、客体论、话语论、功能论角度来看,主体博弈的充分性、身份介入的对等性、交流沟通的论辩性、社会问题的公共性建构了网络公共领域的博弈框架和实践逻辑。同时,网络技术的更新及其引发的社会变革极大地拓展了公共领域的边界和疆域。     

网络社会构建公共领域的困境分析

公共领域是一个处于私人领域和国家之间的社会交往及理性批判空间,其核心是公共利益和公共意志。其建构以社会相对分离和民主制度建立为基础,由主体、公共空间、自由交往和共识四个要素构成。网络的发展无疑给公共领域的构建带来新的机遇,但也助长了消费主义的泛滥,带来了严格的信息过滤以及社会群体极端化、分裂化的倾向,使公共领域的构建面临新的困境。而这一困境的解决有赖于自由表达体制的建立和政治现代化的进程。     

公共管理人才培养机制创新困境与路径选择——基于社会治理视角

公共管理人才培养目前存在着培养理念滞后、培养目标单一、培养机制传统等问题。社会治理所秉持的社会本位、多元共治、公共利益等理念为公共管理人才培养提供了新的思路。该研究基于社会治理视角,旨在树立学生本位与多元合作的理念,形成学生需求、社会需求与人才培育相匹配的培养目标,建构多元共治的人才培养机制,推进公共管理人才培养机制创新。     

哈贝马斯公共领域思想与中国社会公共领域的建构发展——基于改革开放40年以来中国社会的视角

公共领域是哈贝马斯思想中一个非常重要的哲学概念。哈贝马斯以公共领域作为理论基点,通过研究公共领域和公民社会之间的关联,去构建合理的社会发展公共理论体系。通过解读哈贝马斯的公共领域理论,并结合改革开放以来中国的语境,审视哈贝马斯公共领域理论在中国社会公共领域的建构问题,对新时代中国社会公共领域的转型有着不可忽视的理论意义和实践价值。     

公办高校法人治理结构及其建设

我国大多数高校创新能力不足的主要原因是没有建立现代高校法人制度。目前公办高校法人制度建设的主要任务,首先是依法规范政府与高校的所有权与管理权的关系,建立现代法律契约或委托代理关系;其次是健全高校内部的决策、执行与监督机制,确保高校中政治权利、行政权利和学术权利的平衡和制约,为高校的科研创新、人才培养创新和社会服务创新服务。     

论地方突发社会安全事件治理的问题与对策

突发社会安全事件频发已经成为近年来地方治理工作的一个重要特点。在社会转型的背景下,由于体制机制的制约,社会安全事件治理工作还存在较多问题,应当进一步完善突发社会安全事件的治理机制,更加注重社会风险的防控工作,为地方的科学发展提供更好的制度环境。     

Bringing democratic governance into practice: policy enactments responding to neoliberal governance in Spanish public schools*

This article explores different ways in which public primary schools sustain democratic governance structures created beyond those mandated by law in Spain. These new institutional designs, while not opposed to policy text requirements of having a governing body with representatives of parents, teachers and public administration, are being carried out against the grain of the hegemonic neoliberal managerial approach. The objective was to observe the different ways that some schools apply other institutional paths to the current governing bodies by aiming at widening decision-making not only to legal representatives but to all agents. Data come from focus groups, in-depth interviews and observations carried out in four public schools during fieldwork lasting two academic years. The findings show that while some schools are broadening current legal governing bodies, others generate ad hoc bodies transforming legal ones into new institutional arrangements.     

浅析我国公共决策中的社会参与问题

公共决策中的社会参与水平是衡量现代公共决策民主化程度的一项重要指标。公共决策参与程度的高低直接决定着决策的社会认可度和合法性。因此,在我国社会转型的关键阶段,应当从公共决策体制的转型、公共决策参与平台的扩大以及公众决策参与的意识和能力培育等方面加以改革和完善,进一步提高我国公共决策的科学化、民主化、合法化。     

党的执政方式与社会主义政治文明建设

党的十六届四中全会提出的科学执政、民主执政、依法执政的执政方式,体现了现阶段我国社会主义政治文明建设的基本内涵和本质要求;加强党的执政能力建设,努力探索、不断完善科学执政、民主执政、依法执政的执政方式,是进一步推动我国社会主义政治文明建设的根本保障。     

The social justice implications of privatisation in education governance frameworks: a relational account

This paper explores the social justice implications of two, ‘linked’, governance developments which have been instrumental in reshaping many education systems throughout the world: the ‘privatising’ and ‘globalising’ of education (Klees, Stromquist, & Samoff, 2012 Klees, S., Stromquist, N. and Samoff, J., eds. 2012. A critical review of the World Bank’s education strategy 2020, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.  [Google Scholar]). We argue that such education governance innovations demand an explicit engagement with social justice theories, both in themselves, and as offering an opportunity to address issues of social justice that go beyond the re/distribution of education inputs and outputs, important though these are, and which take account of the political and accountability issues raised by globalising of education governance activity. To do this we draw upon Iris Marion Young’s concept of ‘the basic structure’ and her ‘social connection model’ of responsibility (Young, 2006 Young, I. M. 2006. Taking the basic structure seriously. Perspectives in Politics, 4: 91–97. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]a,b) to develop a relational account of justice in education governance frameworks.     

Massifying and internationalising higher education,changing labour markets and social mobility: challenges for education and urban governance

ABSTRACT

The major objective of this introductory article is to set the wider policy context for the present special issue with a particular focus to examine how the massification and internationalisation of higher education has taken place in Asia. More specifically, this introduction highlights the major arguments of articles being adopted in this issue. The contributions have been selected and gathered from presentations in various regional and international research events held in the last few years. Having experienced the growing pressure for enhancing their global competitiveness, governments in Asia are determined to expand their higher education systems to provide more learning opportunities for addressing pressing educational demand, putting additional resources to internationalising student experience and raising the research profile in order to quest for regional education hub and world-class university status. However, the rapid expansion of higher education has indeed created more university graduates than the labour market could fully absorb. It has become problematic when the global market currently experiences economic stagnation. This special issue sets out against such a political economy context to examine issues related to changing labour conditions, youth mobility and challenges for education and urban governance.     

浅谈我国公共危机管理中的社会参与

本文分析了社会参与在公共危机管理中的必要性。从建立健全预警机制、加强宣传等几个方面对公共危机管理中加强公众参与提出了相应的对策建议。     

Translations of new public management: a decentred approach to school governance in four OECD countries

Despite the prevalence of corporate and performative models of school governance within and across different education systems, there are various cases of uneven, hybrid expressions of New Public Management (NPM) that reveal the contingency of global patterns of rule. Adopting a ‘decentred approach’ to governance (Bevir, M. 2010. “Rethinking Governmentality: Towards Genealogies of Governance.” European Journal of Social Theory 13 (4): 423–441), this paper compares the development of NPM in four OECD countries: Australia, England, Spain, and Switzerland. A focus of the paper is how certain policy instruments are created and sustained within highly differentiated geo-political settings and through different multi-scalar actors and authorities yet modified to reflect established traditions and practices.     

社会治理创新之对策研究

作为当代公共行政和公共管理的重要方式,社会治理强调政府、企业、社会组织、社会公众多元共治,共同协商、管理社会公共事务,其目的在于化解社会矛盾、维护社会秩序、保障和改善民生、促进社会公平正义,最终实现社会和谐有序发展。在经济社会双转轨的关键时期,我国的社会治理创新也面临着前所未有的机遇与挑战。创新社会治理,要以理念创新为先导、以转变政府职能为根本、以培养社会自治功能为依托、以社会稳定建设为基础、以法治建设为保障。