提高我国科技期刊数字化竞争力的研究

论述了科技期刊的网站是数字化时代宣传、展示期刊的重要窗口。结合科技期刊在网络化过程中所遇到的问题,分析了科技期刊网络化的大背景。探讨了信息化、网络化所能为编辑部带来的提高工作效率、提高期刊竞争力、推动期刊国际化各方面的效益。并且提出和比较了科技期刊的几种信息化的模式。讨论了传统科技期刊向数字化、网络化方面发展的可行性。     

美国化学会及其期刊的编辑出版

简要介绍美国化学会及其出版机构的宗旨、服务、发展规划,以及编辑出版规章制度.详细分析美国化学会出版期刊的情况.主要从创刊时间、办刊宗旨、刊期、SCI影响因子、期刊出版总页码等方面分析其各种期刊在国际上的影响力.从期刊的单价、捆绑售价以及网络本售价对期刊进行价格方面的分析.以<美国化学会会志>为例,详细分析期刊稿件的来源情况、稿件的处理情况、编辑人员情况、审稿过程和编辑加工过程,以及编辑出版自动化等.     

合并大学学报的3种办刊模式分析

专业学报模式、区域学报模式、网上学报模式是合并大学学报可行的3种办刊模式.对其办刊思想、办刊特点进行了分析.由结果认为:专业学报模式是指按专业特色分类设版办刊,使合并大学学报也能办出与全国性学会主办的学报一样的特色来;区域学报模式即就近办刊分区设版,此种学报主要反映该校区的学科特色及其学术水平,类似于一个单科性大学的学报或小型综合性大学的学报;网上学报模式是指借网络发表一个合并大学的科研论文的办刊,不分版,出版周期灵活,综合度高,网络依赖性强.     

我国科技期刊数字出版的思考

在分析我国科技期刊数字出版现状的基础上,指出我国科技期刊目前还存在着单一发布、延时出版、利益分配机制不完善、无明显盈利模式以及技术力量落后,人才匮乏等问题,提出借船出海和打造国内出版平台实现科技期刊数字出版的思路。     

The Learned Society view of the economics of journal publishing

Considers a pricing policy for the conventional printed journal and how such policies may be devised for electronic publications, and suggests factors which will influence the economics of journal publishing and pricing in the future.     

合并高校办刊的困境及思考

根据合并高校及学报自身的特点,结合中国国情,合并高校办刊应明确目标,合理定位,坚持综合化与专业化相结合,以适应时代和科技发展的趋势,满足现代读者获取信息的需要,从而使合并高校办刊走出困境,实现"两个效益"双丰收.     

Successful journal publishing on the Internet: hit or myth?

If publishers of learned journals are going to make a success of their web publishing, they should not forget all the skills they have developed in publishing in print. This paper reviews the application of familiar journal publishing skills in the context of electronic journals or electronic editions of printed journals, and pinpoints areas where these skills apply in web publishing and where new skills are necessary.     

Metadata for STM journal publishers: a review of the current scene

This article provides an overview of those metadata schemes that are of most relevance to STM journal publishers. The current status of each scheme is discussed, and references given for detailed specifications.     

Mapping the journal publishing landscape: how much do we know?

In debates about journals, their publishers and the future of both, it is important to be clear about what we are discussing. In this article, the sparse existing literature is surveyed, and original sources examined to provide further detail. The membership lists of six leading publishing associations, and the websites of their members, were also studied. More than half of all peer‐reviewed journals in Ulrich's are published by or on behalf of/in association with nonprofit organizations. Other than the top few commercial publishers, there is little difference in size between the two types; the ‘long tail’ of publishers are small and therefore vulnerable, and yet most are not represented by any trade association. The majority of journals come from the USA or the UK. Nonprofits launch fewer new journals, but are also less likely to close journals. The quality advantage of nonprofit journals may be reducing, but nonprofit journals still predominate among the most highly cited journals.     

Medical faculty use of the journal literature, publishing productivity and the size of health sciences library journal collections.

OBJECTIVES: This 1990-1991 study explored the relationship between the size of health sciences library journal collections and the number of different journals cited by medical school faculty in departments of biochemistry and medicine. METHODS: Two regression equations, including variables associated with a national stratified sample of 622 faculty who published articles during those two years, were used to explore factors correlated with variations in faculty use of the journal literature and faculty publishing productivity. RESULTS: Results suggest that, after controlling for other variables in the models, neither the number of different journals those faculty cited, nor the number of articles they published, had statistically significant correlations with the number of journals in the health sciences library collection. CONCLUSION: The traditional view that the size of an academic health sciences library's journal collection is a good measure of how well that library is positioned to support faculty research may not be entirely accurate.     

The Research Assessment Exercise: its effect on scholarly journal publishing

The Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) plays a major part in academic life in the UK. One of its chief measures of ‘research performance’ relates to the publication of articles in refereed scholarly journals. This paper examines the effect of the RAE on the journal publishing system, looking at the communities of authors, editors, and publishers.