法国博洛尼亚进程实施状况述评

博洛尼亚进程的总目标已成为欧洲各国高等教育改革的参照标准,对以多样化为特点的法国高等教育而言,欧洲高等教育一体化的实现是一个长期的历史进程。法国高等教育系统的改革以整合博洛尼亚进程,建立欧洲高等教育研究区为主旋律。博洛尼亚进程的实施对法国高等教育产生了巨大的影响,增强了法国高等教育体制的开放性和流动性,促进了学生的流动性,密切了高等教育领域与社会经济部门的联系,提高了毕业生的就业率。     

博洛尼亚进程:中国视角

一、《博洛尼亚宣言》的核心内容1996年6月,欧洲29国教育部长签署的《博洛尼亚宣言》的核心内容是:(1)在欧洲各国之间实行清晰的、透明的、可比较的学位制度,使各国授予的学位和学历有等值性和对比性。(2)实行高等教育的两级制:学士和硕士。学士学制3-4年,硕士1-2年,承认学士在欧洲劳动力市场上作为完整的高等教育。(3)实行统一的学分制。(4)鼓励学生、教师、教育管理人员和研究人员的自由流动,并为他们的流动创造条件。(5)加强在质量监督领域的欧洲合作,以便制定出可比较的标准和方法。这些做法的目的是在2010年以前建立起欧洲统一的高等教…     

解读“博洛尼亚进程”

＂博洛尼亚进程＂目的在于通过资源整合在欧洲实现高教一体化,这个进程始于由29个国家签署的《博洛尼亚协议》。从经济学的视角来看,＂博洛尼亚进程＂是顺应经济全球化的一项举措。学位体系变革是＂进程＂中最为重要的一项改革,尽管对这个进程存有不少质疑,但欧洲各国仍积极推进,因为＂博洛尼亚进程＂已经不是单纯的教育问题。     

博洛尼亚进程的瑞典大学灵活教育发展模式

实施博洛尼亚进程以来,瑞典大学灵活教育发展模式颇具特点。瑞典大学的灵活教育模式涵盖了以攻读学位为目的国际化灵活教育和基于自主学习的灵活教育。在这一过程中瑞典建立了灵活学习中心和大学网络联盟两个灵活学习机构对灵活教育进行管理,以此服务于终身学习体系的构建,而基于灵活教育的终身学习体系的构建离不开个人学习帐户的支持。借鉴瑞典高校经验,为了促进我国灵活教育的发展,我国高校可尝试构建高校人才逆向供应链、实行灵活多变的学分体系、建立高校个人学习账户、推行大学网络联盟模式,同时加强高校教学与科研的国际化语境。     

The implementation of the Bologna Process

This study identifies the responsibilities of the bodies and institutions involved in the implementation of the Bologna Process. They include the levels of Europe, nations, higher education institutions, departments, degree programmes, teachers and students. The future planning is analysed using the Balanced Scorecard approach designed for the communication and implementation of the strategy. The approach is used to analyse the objectives of European education policy from the different perspectives. Strategic planning and quality assurance are most efficient when they are transformed into action at the closest possible point to teaching and learning.     

The Bologna Process: 15 Years Later

The article analyzes the basic documents adopted by the ministers of education of the country participants in the Bologna Process at their latest meeting in Yerevan, Armenia. It identifies the problems and challenges facing national education systems during the present stage of development, and explores the priorities and obligations of these countries to promote cooperation and integration in the framework of a common educational space. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of statistical data and national reports on the implementation of the main objectives established by European agreements during the current decade. A key factor in ensuring mutual trust and creating a common space for higher education is establishing a multitiered quality assurance system at the institutional, national, and European levels. The author argues for the need to review and approve the new Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG).     

The Social Dimension of the Bologna Process

The Bologna Follow Up Seminar, which took place in Athens in February 2003, continued discussions that had emerged from the Prague Communique´ of May 2001 to the effect that higher education is a public good. This article focuses on the public good aspect of higher education and calls for broadened access and no tuition fees, for the social role of higher education should be viewed as a value in itself.     

基于政策网络视角的博洛尼亚进程研究

博洛尼亚进程政策过程反映出政策网络结构的封闭性问题。博洛尼亚进程成员国是政策制定和执行主体,是政策社群。高校、教师、学生、雇主等参与主体是议题网络。政策网络内多元的利益主体以及复杂的利益关系阻碍了博洛尼亚进程的整体性协调发展。如何打破封闭的博洛尼亚进程政策网络,促进博洛尼亚进程成员国之间的合作与协商成为政策网络的治理目标所在。     

博洛尼亚进程：性质及运作机制

博洛尼亚进程是欧洲国家教育部长基于“辅助性原则”自愿签订的无约束力的政府间教育合作计划。这一性质为开放式协调法的运用提供了契机,开放式协调法具有灵活性、开放性、程序性和非限制性等特点,它使博洛尼亚进程在欧洲复杂多元的高等教育逐步走向和谐统一。     

俄罗斯的博洛尼亚进程:困境及走势

俄罗斯加入博洛尼亚进程既是提升其国家竞争力的需要,也是其参与世界教育服务市场竞争的需要。但是,目前它面临着对"博洛尼亚化"的倡导与反对并存、被认为是一场"没有激情的运动"等困境。尽管如此,俄罗斯的博洛尼亚进程仍有"软着陆"的趋势。     

“博洛尼亚进程”一体多元指导原则下的德意高等教育改革

建设一体化的欧洲高等教育区是欧洲高等教育进一步发展的战略选择,然而欧洲高等教育的复杂多元却是不可回避的事实。因此“博洛尼亚进程”在推行过程中以“一体化与多元化并存”为指导原则,通过一体化协调多元化,多元化支撑一体化,指导欧洲高等教育改革的实践,具体表现在学位制度改革和建立高等教育质量保障体系的改革中。德国、意大利的高等教育改革具有典型性,在融入一体化进程中不失本国特色。     

博洛尼亚进程述论

作为欧洲高等教育改革重大举措的博洛尼亚进程,即欧洲高等教育区建设进程,是在高等教育国际化和欧洲经济政治一体化的背景下产生的.它以建构欧洲高等教育区为目标,旨在加强各成员国之间高等教育的可比性和兼容性,增强欧洲高等教育的吸引力和竞争力,提高欧洲高等教育的质量,重塑欧洲高等教育的辉煌.1999年6月,欧洲29国教育部长共同签署<博洛尼亚宣言>,提出建设欧洲高等教育区的具体构想、行动纲领和工作计划.其后,经过历次会议特别是5次部长峰会的评估和改革,逐步形成"学位体系建设、质量保证、学位互认、促进流动、联合学位、终身学习、社会维度和机会均等、提升就业力、全球化背景下的欧洲高等教育"等新的行动目标,并在学制改革、质量保证、学分互换、学位互认等方面取得明显进展.2007年的伦敦会议明确提出,要建设"全球化背景下欧洲高等教育区".从<索邦宣言>欧洲高等教育区的设想到EHEA的形成规模,从当初的4个发起国到现在的46个成员国,博洛尼亚进程走过了10年,其内容不断丰富,目标日益完善,原则广受认同,且一直处于发展、改革和完善之中,致力于协调进程在各国实施进度的差异、保持进程趋同化发展中的多样性、寻求不同民族和国家在区域性合作和竞争中的平衡.     

A Different View of the Bologna Process: the case of Turkey

Since the beginning of the 20^th century, integration with the Western world has been a determining driver of higher education policies, as well as many other policy areas in Turkey. Becoming a signatory country of the Bologna Process in 2001 brought a new impulse to the higher education policies in this direction. The Bologna Process reforms introduced necessary changes and set new challenges. This article discusses the main implementation activities in the context of the Bologna Process in Turkey and the governance of the reform at the national level with a focus on the roles of the key national bodies.     

博洛尼亚进程中的乌克兰高等教育： 变革与挑战

在欧洲一体化和国内高等教育停滞不前的双重压力下,乌克兰于2005 年加入博洛尼亚 进程,对本国高等教育学位体系、学分体系和质量保障体系进行了深入的改革。改革取得了明显的 成就,但也面临着新旧体制并存、政府与高校间的分歧和教育市场化危机等重重挑战。乌克兰高等 教育会因这次改革比过去更具国际竞争力。     

博洛尼亚进程:历程、进展与未来

到2007年,推动欧洲高等教育一体化建设的博洛尼亚进程已实施八年。针对2010年建成"欧洲高等教育区"的目标,对过去两年博洛尼亚进展中的成绩和问题进行了分项目的分析,指出了欧洲高等教育未来发展需要努力的十二个方面。     

The Bologna Process: perspectives and implications for the Russian university

This article draws on the discourses of educational policy in Europe to focus on the implications of the Bologna Process for higher education in Russia. The Bologna Process, as a multi-dimensional discourse involving a variety of social actors, reflects some of the complexities and contradictions of globalisation, in many local cases evoking responses and leading to outcomes which were neither planned nor predicted by the official educational policy planners. The role of international organisations in the reform of Russian higher education is considered and the barriers, limitations and possible consequences of Bologna for the Russian situation are explored.     

The Impact of the Bologna Process in Ibero-America: prospects and challenges

The Bologna Process is one of the major developments to have taken place in higher education in recent centuries. It has had an impact beyond European borders and repercussions in other parts of the world. Ibero-America has also sat up and taken note, even though scholars agree that there would be difficulties with its direct implementation in the region. Specialised opinions like these might suggest the initiative could not be implemented elsewhere. There can be no doubt, however, about the influence of the Bologna Process. On the one hand, the European Union has promoted and sponsored projects which involve transferring specific instruments (like Tuning) to the Ibero-American region. On the other, Latin America faces integration and globalisation challenges that are similar to Europe's and these, in turn, call for the development of approaches and instruments that will facilitate academic mobility and increase the transparency of degrees and qualifications. The recent impetus injected by the Ibero-American Summits into the Ibero-American Knowledge Space also seeks to help build common ground in higher education, scientific research and technological development.