论科技期刊与科研活动的相互作用

从科技期刊和科研工作相互关系的角度研究科技期刊对科研活动的影响,分析科技期刊对科研工作和科研人员的影响以及科研活动对科技期刊的影响.论证科技期刊对科研活动的支撑作用主要体现在科研成果的发表对科研人员的发掘与培养,而科研活动对科技期刊的作用体现在对科技期刊学术影响力的提高以及对科技期刊编辑科学素质和学术水平的提高.     

科技情报与科技智库的融合发展探析

与科技智库一样,面向科技创新决策提供支持服务一直都是科技情报的核心功能属性。本文从科技情报与科技智库机构发展的一体化、成果产出的趋同化和研究方法的定量化等三个角度,对当前科技情报与科技智库正呈出现融合发展的态势进行了分析研究。文章认为,随着我国大力推动中国特色新型智库的建设,科技情报与科技智库的融合发展,既给我国传统科技情报机构提供了新的发展机遇,也将加快推动我国科技智库体系的建设完善。     

科技编辑学与科技写作学的关系

以科技编辑学和科技写作学的客观存在为基础，从不同侧面、不同角度阐述并剖析了它们之间的关联性和相互影响。认为：科技写作学是科技编辑学存在的基础，是科技编辑学的基础学科；科技编辑学是科技写作学一个侧面的延伸和发展；科技语言和科技文献是这2个学科共同研究的内容；2个学科的部分研究内容相互借鉴；2个学科的主体、客体存在关联性；虽然这2个学科有其相对的独立性，但是它们统一于科技文献学之中。     

Scientific book literature in a digital society

blishing in a digital society are analyzed. The concept of the e-book is described. The role and functions of publishing houses focused on the publication of scientific literature are reviewed. The differences between the use of copyrights for scientific literature and all other types of publications are specified. In those cases where the government contributes to the funding of scientific literature through research foundations, it is proposed to limit the role of publishing houses to technical functions related to layout design and thus ensure the subsequent inclusion of scientific publications in open free access. The possibility of expanding the list of scientific literature items that can be supported publicly is justified. The need to legally support the digitalization of scientific literature published in the Soviet Union and its subsequent inclusion into open access is discusse.     

替代计量学视角下的在线科学交流新模式

论述我国科学家科学交流的落后状态及其主要原因,阐述替代计量学的生态体系,据此构建在线科学交流新模式,详细论述其传递机制和过滤机制,进而刻画基于替代计量学的在线科学交流过程,揭示这种新模式能消除之前在线科学交流之障碍的机理。     

Who posts scientific tweets? An investigation into the productivity,locations, and identities of scientific tweeters

Twitter altmetrics has been proposed to measure the popularity and the potential societal impact of scientific products, but scientific tweeters who produce the Twitter altmetrics data have not been well explored. The study, by analyzing 2.63 million scientific tweeters’ data that are extracted from the Altmetric.com company dataset, is aimed to reveal their productivity and geographic distribution in a comprehensive way. To gain a more in-depth understanding of their account types and identities, 1468 scientific tweeters of different levels of activeness are sampled for further analysis. Our results show that: (1) The extent to which a small proportion of tweeters have posted most of scientific tweets increases over time. In 2016, 10% of scientific tweeters have posted 80% of scientific tweets; (2) Scientific tweeters are widely distributed around the world but in a different pattern with the distribution of general Twitter users. In addition, scientific tweeters are found to be more active in tweeting scientific products than retweeting them in certain areas. (3) Manual coding of the sampled tweeters shows that the percentage of bot accounts among scientific tweeters is 1.8%, which is much lower than that among general Twitter users. Moreover, 73% of scientific tweeters use Twitter for professional purpose, 76% use real names for their accounts, and 16% are institutional accounts. (4) Identities of scientific tweeters are diversified. 49% of them are researchers among which university faculty is the major type, and 38% of them are the general public. With these results we suggest number of scientific tweets is not a good indicator of measuring either popularity or impact, tweeter’s productivity, location and identities must be taken into consideration in interpreting the meaning of Twitter altmetrics.     

国内外高校科学数据管理和机制建设研究

科学数据管理的重要性在国外已得到广泛共识,科学数据公开和共享的法规、社会环境以及管理和运行模式已经成熟,世界组织和资助机构采取措施加以推进,高校管理层及图书馆积极应对,科学数据管理方式不断演进,合作与联盟的机制已经形成。相比之下,国内高校科学数据管理相对滞后,政府、基金项目主管部门和高校内部都未建立明确的管理制度,因此提出建立我国高校科学数据管理机制的5点建议。     

国外期刊科学数据管理调查与分析

[目的/意义]为国内期刊开展科学数据管理提供思考与借鉴,并结合国内相关现状提出期刊科学数据管理框架以及合理的发展建议。[方法/过程]通过调研选取国外开展科学数据管理较好的15家期刊为研究对象,分析其在科学数据管理相关政策、科学数据提交、仓储平台和开放获取等四方面的特点。[结果/结论]得到如下启示:制定完整的科学数据管理政策;建立详细的科学数据提交流程;关联专业的科学数据仓储平台;积极促进科学数据的开放获取等建议。     

Scientific schools in bibliography: Peculiarities of formation

The approaches to the concept of a “scientific school” in bibliography and peculiarities of the formation of scientific schools in the bibliography science, connected with the humanities character of this science and principles of its formation as a scientific discipline are considered. The main characteristics of bibliographic scientific schools are proposed and the problem of their identification and creation of a definition is put forward.     

新媒体环境下科研信息行为与特征分析

[目的/意义]调查新媒体环境下高校研究者科研信息行为,分析新媒体环境下高校研究者科研信息行为特征,为知识信息服务者提供科研信息服务提出建议与对策。[方法/过程]构建新媒体环境下科研信息行为特征模型,选取高校研究者作为调查样本,运用问卷调查法对其科研信息资源使用情况、科研信息获取行为、科研信息消化行为、科研信息追踪行为、科研信息交流行为及科研信息服务需求进行调查分析,验证新媒体环境下科研信息行为特征模型。[结果/结论]高校研究者对新媒体科研信息资源依赖度较高,对电子期刊的偏好最高,且关注信息资源的质量;科研信息获取行为呈现途径多元化的特征;科研信息消化行为呈现碎片化特征;科研信息追踪行为呈现传统途径居多、方式单一化的特征;科研信息交流行为呈现新媒体平台交流主导化的特征;新媒体平台科研信息服务需求呈现个性化的特征。除科研信息追踪行为特征与模型存在偏差外,基本验证了所构建的新媒体环境下科研信息行为特征模型。