科技期刊在线稿件处理系统的研究与设计

为了减少科技期刊编辑工作强度、加快稿件处理速度,研究设计一种框架模式,通过对模式的抽取实现实际的编辑业务规则的稿件处理系统.系统的实现采用MVC架构,采用Spring＋Hibernate 开发框架,以XML作为数据存储的载体贯穿MVC的各个部分.通过互联网将作者、编辑、审稿专家、主编等相关人员紧密联系起来,实现投稿、编辑、专家审稿、主编初审、主编终审的连续处理.实现审稿系统的人性化、合理化、流畅化,通过网络的数字化彻底提高编辑部的办公效率.系统投入运行后,大大提高了编辑的办公效率,缩短了稿件处理的周期.     

高校学报责任编辑初审功能有效性探讨

做好稿件的初审工作是办好学术期刊的首要环节,是遏制审稿失范,提高稿件质量的先决要素,也是责任编辑发挥主观能动性的最佳阵地。责任编辑初审的主要任务是优选稿件,正确送审。稿件的选送在以质取胜的原则下还应考虑其它方面因素的影响,因而应对稿件进行立体多维审视,优化组合选送,从而提高初审工作的有效性和科学性。     

Churches and the Australian community

Abstract

It is rare for a PhD candidate who submits a thesis for examination to fail outright. If a thesis exhibits significant flaws the candidate may be required to make major revisions and re‐submit the work for re‐examination. The written comments of examiners before and after resubmission can provide important insights into the process of examination and the qualities examiners identify in a marginal thesis. Drawing on 101 of the most recent, completed theses across fields in one Australian university, this article investigates the differences in examiner comment on the qualities of theses by the same candidates before and after major revision and re‐submission (N = 6), and between these theses and those that were ‘passed’ at the first examination (N=95). Critical comments about the literature review and the degree to which the examiner moved into a supervisory role were found to be strong indicators of theses at the margin’.     

提高科技期刊专家审稿质量的途径

为了使专家审稿的过程更加快速有效,从审稿专家的选取、审稿方式和方法的选择、审稿过程的控制等方面对提高科技期刊专家审稿质量的途径进行了分析,只有在正确的审稿专家选择原则的指导下,采用正确的审稿方式和方法,并对审稿过程进行合理的控制,才能使审稿专家对刊物有更加深入的了解,从而更加准确地把握稿件的学术质量。     

高校学报稿件处理存在的问题及解决对策

高校学报工作中普遍存在着稿件处理时限过长和忽视稿件答复的问题,这既挫伤了作者的积极性,又阻碍了学报的发展。学报编辑部应通过建立科学的稿件处理制度、缩短审稿周期、增加稿件的淘汰率及建立编辑和作者的沟通机制等措施,来有效解决这一问题。