试谈语文教育测量与评价的原则

制定体现新课程理念的语文教育测量与评价方案，是当前语文教学改革面临的一个重要课题。为了保证语文教育测量与评价方案的可用性，必须遵循科学性原则、简洁性原则、区分性原则、公平性原则和可行性原则。     

GPS RTK测量成果的质量控制方法

讨论了GPSRTK测量成果的质量控制问题,文中提出了四种用于RTK质量控制的有效方法。     

企业集团内部控制的特点与方法

企业集团内部成员企业之间的关系不同于单体企业内部车间、部门的关系,这决定了企业集团的内部控制有别于单体企业。企业集团仍要遵循内部控制的基本原理,运用基本方法,与单体企业既有相似的地方,又有所差异。     

责任、权益视角下学位点建设与质量评估的风险控制

减少学位点建设与质量评估中的委托代理损失,需要考虑放权背景下行动者的行动取向的变化,建立行政、学术、制度和程序等构成的风险控制系统,解决学位点建设中的数量和质量、均衡与重点、需要与现实、主动和被动等两难问题。,     

测控技术与仪器专业在线分析仪器课程群建设与实践

利用我校石油和冶金两大行业优势,在测控技术与仪器专业开设独具特色的在线分析技术专业课程,制定课程教学大纲,建设实验实训设施、开展过程在线分析技术的课题研究,提高教师的专业水平和素养。实践表明:开展在线分析仪器类课程教学后,学生初步具备在线分析技术的应用能力,显现出我校测控技术与仪器专业的在线分析仪器的专业特色,有助于培养市场紧缺的在线分析技术人才。     

PLC逻辑控制程序设计的方法与技巧

逻辑控制是指输入信号以及输出信号均为离散量信号的控制，是可编程序控制器通用的基本功能，任何一种PLC都能很方便地实现逻辑控制；实际生产控制过程中经常遇到的逻辑程序设计问题是要对输入设备的类型有充分认识，必须弄清它是动断常闭触点、还是动合常开触点，在程序中是如何区别和表示的，为突出实用性分别介绍几种逻辑控制程序设计的方法与技巧。     

An Eight-Week Group Treatment Program for Bulimia

The following paper outlines an eight-week group treatment program for bulimia that is within the scope of counseling services offered by most universities and colleges. It includes interventions that have been deemed necessary for recovery from the disorder such as cognitive restructuring, relapse prevention techniques, and family-of-origin work. Brief commentary is given to common themes and processes that emerge during the couse of this type of group.     

论研究生教育评估的要素、程序、方法和技术——基于公共组织绩效管理的视角

认为研究生教育评估的要素确定、程序设计、方法和技术的使用关系到评估结果的有效性、合法性和可信度,进而影响到研究生教育质量的保障与提高。从公共组织绩效管理的视角出发,在分析研究生教育评估要素的基础上,设计评估程序,阐释评估方法和技术,以完善研究生教育评估制度。     

A Controlled Evaluation of a High School Biomedical Pipeline Program: Design and Methods

Given limited funding for school-based science education, non-school-based programs have been developed at colleges and universities to increase the number of students entering science- and health-related careers and address critical workforce needs. However, few evaluations of such programs have been conducted. We report the design and methods of a controlled trial to evaluate the Stanford Medical Youth Science Program’s Summer Residential Program (SRP), a 25-year-old university-based biomedical pipeline program. This 5-year matched cohort study uses an annual survey to assess educational and career outcomes among four cohorts of students who participate in the SRP and a matched comparison group of applicants who were not chosen to participate in the SRP. Matching on sociodemographic and academic background allows control for potential confounding. This design enables the testing of whether the SRP has an independent effect on educational- and career-related outcomes above and beyond the effects of other factors such as gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic background, and pre-intervention academic preparation. The results will help determine which curriculum components contribute most to successful outcomes and which students benefit most. After 4 years of follow-up, the results demonstrate high response rates from SRP participants and the comparison group with completion rates near 90 %, similar response rates by gender and ethnicity, and little attrition with each additional year of follow-up. This design and methods can potentially be replicated to evaluate and improve other biomedical pipeline programs, which are increasingly important for equipping more students for science- and health-related careers.     

Web-Based Student Assessment for Program Evaluation

As part of an overall evaluation of the Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment, (GLOBE) program, we designed a Web-based assessment environment to measure students' environmental awareness and data analysis skill. It was expected that students who were identified as high implementers in the GLOBE program would outperform low implementers in their ability to construct environmental inferences and the degree to which they could analyze environmental data. Seven high and middle school classrooms were identified as either high or low GLOBE implementers depending on the amount of atmospheric data they had collected during the year. Within each classroom students were assigned into smaller learning groups of three students per group. A total of 32 groups participated in this study. Analysis of students' responses to the tasks revealed that the students differed in their performance. Overall, the results showed that students in the high implementing classrooms were more likely to construct higher-level environmental inferences than students in the low implementing classes. Contrary to expectations, middle school students were more likely than high school students to solve the data analysis problem correctly. However, upon further analyses, high school students constructed more data graphs and were more skilled in providing correct evidence to support their decision making than were middle school students in GLOBE. This study confirms the viability of using technology-based assessments for measuring students' environmental awareness and data analysis.