浅论家庭暴力的原因及对策

近年来,随着家庭暴力的日趋严重化和公开化,家庭暴力的危害性已逐渐为人们所认识。预防和制止家庭暴力已经引起各级政府和全社会的普遍关注,反家庭暴力立法的呼声日益高涨。家庭暴力产生存在主观和客观的原因,而家庭暴力不仅给个人的身心健康造成伤害,同时也不利于社会的安定团结。解决家庭暴力问题,涉及社会、法律、政策等许多领域。尽快建立起道德、法律、社会、等各层面的社会支持体系,才能有效遏止家庭暴力。     

妇女遭受家庭暴力问题研究

家庭暴力是困扰国内外妇女的重要问题之一，在家庭暴力中受到伤害最多的是妇女。为了防止妇女遭受家庭暴力，必须建立法律、社会、心理各层面的社会支持系统。文章阐述了妇女遭受家庭暴力的内涵，分析了妇女遭受家庭暴力的原因，并探讨了预防妇女遭受家庭暴力的对策。     

关于界定家庭暴力的若干思考

家庭暴力是一种违法行为。反家庭暴力首先要科学界定家庭暴力，而科学的界定家庭暴力就应该根据我国的国情确定家庭暴力的主体和明确家庭暴力的形式。     

论家庭暴力证据规则之完善

家庭暴力是发生在家庭成员之间的暴力行为。日益严重的家庭暴力已引起全社会的广泛关注。由于现行的证据规则在证据的采信、认定方面并没有充分考虑家庭暴力案件的特点，这不利于保护家庭暴力之受害人。为了更好地惩治家庭暴力，更好地维护受害人的合法权益，必须建立完善的家庭暴力之证据规则。     

家庭暴力对儿童的恶劣影响与解决对策

据妇联部门调查统计，在我国的２．７亿个家庭中，３０％存在家庭暴力，大约每年有１０万个家庭因此而解体，并且近几年，家庭暴力案件呈上升趋势。家庭暴力共分为精神暴力、身体暴力和性暴力。家庭暴力的受害者不仅仅是妇女、老人等，还包括未成年的孩子。目前社会各界对家庭暴力都投入了广泛的关注，但是，还有很多人并未能清醒地认识到家庭暴力对未成年人的身心健康所造成的严重危害，更不知道该怎样帮助这些身处暴力家庭中的孩子。一、家庭暴力对儿童造成不可估量的负面影响家庭暴力导致儿童心理和人格的扭曲。家庭暴力对孩子的身体、认…     

论家庭暴力及其法律规制

作为一个全球性的社会问题,家庭暴力在我国也普遍存在,对家庭暴力进行法律规制是我国面临的重大课题。文章在对家庭暴力进行界定的基础上,探讨了我国家庭暴力的现状,并对我国家庭暴力的成因进行了分析,进而介绍了我国家庭暴力法律规制的现状,并指出其存在的不足。针对我国家庭暴力法律规制的不足,文章提出了完善建议:完善家庭暴力的民事责任制度,完善警察介入家庭暴力,健全家庭暴力的刑事规制,制定《反家庭暴力法》。     

关于界定家庭暴力的若干思考

家庭暴力是一种违法行为.反家庭暴力首先要科学界定家庭暴力,而科学的界定家庭暴力就应该根据我国的国情确定家庭暴力的主体和明确家庭暴力的形式.     

试述当前我国家庭暴力的现状、原因与对策

家庭是社会成员的重要组成部分,日益严重的家庭暴力危害了受害者的身心健康,侵犯了受害者的合法权益,破坏了社会稳定和谐.本文对我国家庭暴力的概念和现状进行概括,从历史原因、社会原因和法律原因三方面对家庭暴力的成因进行分析,最后从进一步完善立法和加强执法力度、广泛开展反家庭暴力的宣传教育、建立专门的家庭暴力法律援助机构、建立多层次的家庭暴力救助渠道四个方面对家庭暴力的相关对策提出肤浅的认识.     

预防和制止家庭暴力的法律对策

家庭暴力是一个严重的社会问题,它侵害了家庭成员的利益,给社会发展带来了不利影响,防止家庭暴力已成为全世界的共同目标。在借鉴英、美、日等国防治家庭暴力措施的基础上,分析了我国现行反家庭暴力措施的局限性,并提出了一些预防和制止家庭暴力的法律对策。     

儿童家庭暴力的成因及法律规制

近年来儿童遭受家庭暴力的案件频频发生,2014年最高人民法院公布10起涉家庭暴力典型案例中,就有2起是明显涉及儿童家庭暴力的案件。由于主体的特定性和行为高度的隐密性,儿童家庭暴力并未引起人们更多的关注和反思。本文从儿童家庭暴力的特殊性出发,深入探讨儿童家庭暴力的成因,并为今后预防和制止儿童家庭暴力提出建议。     

Social support and the relationship between family and community violence exposure and psychopathology among high risk adolescents

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the protective effect of social support in the relationship between exposure to violence and psychopathology. Exposure to violence in the family and exposure to violence in the community were examined separately. Exposure to violence was further divided according to whether violence was experienced as a victim or as a witness. Internalizing and externalizing forms of psychopathology, as well as post-traumatic stress symptomatology were examined. METHOD: Participants consisted of 65 high-risk adolescents admitted consecutively to psychiatric inpatient units. Data were collected by means of individual interviews, self-report questionnaires, and hospital charts. RESULTS: Social support emerged as a protective factor with respect to the maladaptive effects of family violence, experienced as either a victim or as a witness. In contrast, social support did not appear to buffer the maladaptive effects of community violence, regardless of whether violence was experienced as a victim or as a witness. In fact, the relationship between community violence and psychopathology was found to be generally nonsignificant regardless of social support status. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that exposure to family violence may affect development differently than exposure to community violence, allowing social support to effectively buffer the effects of family, but not community violence. This finding highlights the importance of examining violence exposure that occurs within the family separately from violence exposure that occurs within the community.     

Maladaptive schemas as mediators of the relationship between previous victimizations in the family and dating violence victimization in adolescents

This study examined whether exposure to family violence, both in the form of direct victimization and witnessing violence, predicted dating violence victimization in adolescents through maladaptive schemas. A sample of 933 adolescents (445 boys and 488 girls), aged between 13 and 18 (M = 15.10), participated in a three-year longitudinal study. They completed measures of exposure to family violence, maladaptive schemas of disconnection/rejection, and dating violence victimization. The findings indicate that witnessing family violence predicts the increase of dating violence victimization over time, through the mediation of maladaptive schemas in girls, but not in boys. Direct victimization in the family predicts dating violence victimization directly, without the mediation of schemas. In addition, maladaptive schemas contribute to the perpetuation of dating violence victimization over time. These findings provide new opportunities for preventive interventions, as maladaptive schemas can be modified.     

试论家庭暴力的侵权责任

家庭暴力是指行为人以殴打、捆绑、残害、强行限制人身自由或者其他手段,给其家庭成员的身体、精神等方面造成一定伤害后果的行为。但这一概念准确性尚存疑义。家庭暴力的表现形式包括身体暴力、精神暴力和性暴力。目前对于家庭暴力的救济还主要是限于行政责任和刑事责任,这种救济模式存在一定的缺陷,必须完善家庭暴力的相关立法。     

我国现阶段家庭暴力问题的法律责任及防止对策

我国现阶段有30％的家庭有暴力侵害的问题。由于针对妇女的家庭暴力产生的原因是复杂多样的，因而消除针对妇女的家庭暴力必然是一个系统工程，需要做大量的和多方面的工作，其中最基本的主要有反对家庭暴力、制裁家庭暴力、帮助受害和建设家庭明等。     

家庭暴力防治探析:法律规则与道德规则之间

家庭暴力打破了家庭生活应有的宁静与和谐,使得昔日作为"避风港"的家沦为"人间地狱"。现代社会防治家庭暴力具有秩序合理化、关注社会弱势群体权益以及和谐等价值意蕴。应当寻求法律规则与道德规则的良性互动,通过综合治理,如有条件有限度的警察权和司法权的介入、民政部门等社会组织的介入等,根除家庭暴力,保障家庭成员间关系和睦友好。     

试析现阶段中国家庭暴力问题的成因

本文针对现阶段中国家庭暴力问题,结合个案,从历史的、社会的角度和人格心理的、妇女自身的因素进行分析,查找家庭暴力问题的成因,并希望能引起社会各界对此问题的重视,使更多的人来关注家庭暴力问题,关注在家庭暴力事件中的受害者。     

The rates and correlates of the exposure of Palestinian adolescents to family violence: toward an integrative-holistic approach

OBJECTIVES: First, to examine the rates of Palestinian adolescents' exposure to (i.e., witnessing and experiencing) different patterns of psychological aggression and physical violence in their families of origin; and second, to examine the correlation between this exposure and sociodemographic characteristics, parents' psychological adjustment problems, and family exposure to political stressors. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was carried out among a sample of 1,185 Palestinian secondary school students. RESULTS: The study reveals very alarming rates of witnessing interparental and parent-to-sibling aggression and violence, and high rates of experiencing aggression and violence by parents and siblings during childhood and adolescence. In addition, these rates were found to be intercorrelated, and correlated significantly with several sociodemographic characteristics such as parents' levels of education, place of residence, family size, religious affiliation, family income, and housing conditions, as well as with parents' psychological adjustment problems and with family exposure to political stressors. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study reveal strong evidence that emphasizes the importance of studying violence in the family from an integrative, comprehensive, and ecological perspective that incorporates intrapersonal traits, family stress theory, family resources theory, social learning theory, and sociological and environmental factors, to explain the risk factors and predictors of violence in the family.     

Exposure to violence,typology, and recidivism in a probation sample of domestic violence perpetrators

The present study investigated the predictive utility of self-reported domestic violence perpetrators’ exposure to violence in their family of origin and patterns related to this exposure through the use of longitudinal analyses on a sample of 228 men on probation in Lake County, Illinois. Differences in typology, recidivism, recidivism frequency, and violent behavior survival patterns in men with a history of domestic violence perpetration and with varying levels of family of origin violence exposure were examined. Findings suggest that those who witnessed interparental violence (either alone, or in combination with experiencing violence) were most likely to be classified as Generally Violent offenders (e.g., perpetrators who direct violence toward their family and others), compared to those who did not report experiencing or witnessing violence. In addition, results also indicate that men who experienced both witnessing interparental violence and receiving physical abuse in childhood were more likely to recidivate more frequently compared to those who did not report experiencing or witnessing violence. No significant findings for typology and recidivism were noted. Clinical and policy/practice implications are discussed.     

家庭暴力原因与防范

我国家庭暴力的深层原因是妇女的合法权益受到夫权侵害,相关立法不完善。防范家庭暴力:应充分发挥妇联在反家庭暴力方面的独特作用;确立与婚姻法相配套的惩治家庭暴力的实施细则;提供相配套的社会性的帮助措施;借鉴其他国家有关立法、执法中惩治家庭暴力的成熟经验;提高社会全体成员的法律意识。