应考作文快速开头十法

考试作文写作时间有限,如果不会快速开头,有时就不能把作文写完,导致作文低分。下面介绍十种应考作文快速开头方法:一、早看试题法。拿到试卷后,先看作文试题,了解写作要求,再解答阅读部分的试题。这时,潜意识会帮助我们审题、立意、打腹稿。当一个多小时后开始作文时,就可以快速开头。     

作文批改的艺术

作文批改是作文教学中必不可少的环节之一,是沟通学生写作和教师讲评的关节.作文批改得法,能激发学生写作兴趣,培养学生写作情感,快速提高学生作文水平.     

提高作文讲评效果的有效途径

作文讲评是作文教学中不可或缺的一部分,具有承前启后的作用。长期以来,大多数教师在作文教学中比较重视学生写作前的指导和写作后的批改,而不够重视作文讲评,以致学生的作文能力无法快速提高。一次成功的作文讲评,可以调动学生写作的积极性,增强学生写作的欲望,激发学生再创作的热情。那么,教师该如何提高作文讲评课的效果呢？笔者认为教师应重点从以下几个方面着手。     

话题作文快速构思技巧

话题作文教学是语文教学中的难点,学生常常对话题作文写作无从下手。本文以近年来全国高考作文题材料为例,来寻求话题作文快速构思的有效方法,解决学生话题写作的难题。     

借助微课资源提升初中微写作教学效率

将微课融入初中作文教学有利于激发学生的写作兴趣,突破作文教学难点,快速提升学生的作文水平;有利于实施差异化教学,促使学生作文素养的提升;有利于学生广泛积累写作素材,强化作文修改意识,养成积极写作、勤于修改的良好习惯.     

浅谈"快速作文"训练

一、快速作文的意义 对于今天的中学生来说,快速作文早已不是陌生的名称,大大小小的语文考试需要快速作文.<中学语文教学大纲>对中学生的写作速度已有明文要求.当今社会是高效率快节奏的生活,这就需要快速写作来进行交流.今天的学生是明天社会的主人,为了适应时代的需求和未来的工作,培养中学生快速作文的技巧是十分必要的.     

指导学生掌握快速作文方法

一、快速审题审题是作文的第一步,也是作文写作的关键。审题就是通过对作文题目的思考和分析,了解命题者的意图,弄清写作目的,确立写作对象、范围和重点,明确立意,选择材料,确定文章的文体等。“快速作文”要求学生必须在二三分钟之内完成审题任务,     

作文教学方法之我见

杨初春，这位被誉为“中国快速作文之父”的特级教师在提到自己的“快速作文教学的原理”时说到：“快速作文教学法实际上是一项开发学生思维和写作潜能的系统工程。基本原理是写作技巧和思维训练的完美结合，其核心是思维强化训练。”因此，快速作文教学应以思维训练为杠杆，把听说读写有机地结合起来，以达到最大限度地开发学生的写作潜能，从而提高学生的写作水平。     

任务驱动型作文写作结构模式探析

探析作文行文的结构模式,一是为了便于写作教学指导,二是为了让学生写作借鉴,快速行文。任务驱动型作文是新材料作文的演进。根据其作文题材料的特点及其作文写作特点,研究归纳了两种类型的任务驱动型作文,由此而产生两种相对应的写作模式:引、析、提—议—联—结和起—承—转—合。     

浅谈留学生快速作文写作方法

作文,是留学生汉语语言水平和书面表达能力的综合体现,在留学生汉语水平考试命题写作中更是具有举足轻重的地位.要想使留学生在规定时间内完成写作任务,必须采用一种快速作文写作法.该方法包括快速审题法、快速构思法、快速行文法和快速修改法.     

Writing quality in Chinese children: speed and fluency matter

There were two goals of the present study. The first was to create a scoring scheme by which 9-year-old Chinese children??s writing compositions could be rated to form a total score for writing quality. The second was to examine cognitive correlates of writing quality at age 9 from measures administered at ages 6?C9. Age 9 writing compositions were scored using a 7-element rubric; following confirmatory factor analyses, 5 of these elements were retained to represent overall writing quality for subsequent analyses. Measures of vocabulary knowledge, Chinese word dictation, phonological awareness, speed of processing, speeded naming, and handwriting fluency at ages 6?C9 were all significantly associated with the obtained overall writing quality measure even when the statistical effect of age was removed. With vocabulary knowledge, dictation skill, age, gender, and phonological awareness included in a regression equation, 35% of the variance in age 9 writing quality was explained. With the variables of speed of processing, speeded naming, and handwriting fluency additionally included as a block, 12% additional variance in the equation was explained. In addition to gender, overall unique correlates of writing quality were dictation, speed of processing, and handwriting fluency, underscoring the importance of both general automaticity and specific writing fluency for writing quality development in children.     

Factors affecting the speed of free writing

Factors affecting the free writing speed of 11‐year‐old students were investigated using the Group and Individual Assessment of Handwriting Speed. Intelligence, gender, legibility and whether the student has special educational needs or speaks English as an additional language were all found to impact on writing speed to a significant extent. In one of the two schools studied, the students wrote significantly faster than the students in the other school. This ‘teacher effect’ was found to be independent of the other significant factors examined in the study and was attributed largely to instructional differences between schools and teachers. The average writing speed was 36% lower than published norms for this test, implying that 70.2% of the students would be eligible for extra time in examinations and raising doubts regarding the validity of these norms. It was concluded that vulnerability to teacher effects and other factors makes free writing an unreliable method of measuring writing speed, especially when group administered, and calls into question its use to justify the provision of examination access arrangements or accommodations.     

小学高年级习作教学的要求与特点——对语文课程标准第三学段习作教学目标的认识

正确认识小学高年级阶段的习作目标,对促进整个写作教学改革有着重要的意义。小学高年级习作教学的目标概括表现在三个方面的内容:(1)让学生初步掌握四种文体的写作方法,提升习作能力;(2)强调写作既要珍视自我感受,又要学会传意交流;(3)要提高写作速度,适应社会发展需要。理解了这三点,就把握了小学阶段习作教学改革发展的方向。     

Handwriting: Ergonomics, Assessment and Instruction

Handwriting is a skill which must be taught. The aim in teaching handwriting is for each child to develop a personal style which remains legible at speed. This objective requires the systematic teaching of handwriting. Teachers need to ascertain what are the important factors to consider when teaching handwriting and how to assess pupil performance. Chris Bailey reviews research on some of the factors affecting writing – pencil grip, finger pressure, writing implements and writing paper – and the literature relating to the assessment of legibility and speed. The author is headteacher of a primary school in the London Borough of Enfield.     

盲童点字书写效果比较研究

本研究运用单一被试实验法、观察法和测试法 ,对宁波盲校小学部 1 996级1 0名学生点字书写的 4年研究发现 :盲童使用点字板 (笔 )和使用盲文打字机的书写效果不同 ,使用盲文打机比使用点字板 /笔书写速度快 2倍 ,使用盲文打字机书写效率较高 ;盲童使用不同规格点字板、点字笔和纸张对点字书写速度有一定影响。     

基于Intel架构的磁盘缓存研究

随着网络的发展,越来越多的用户开始考虑构建服务器,但磁盘性能不高一直是其所面临的问题。磁盘的性能与缓存速度有着密切的关联。在原有的Cache算法中引入数据压缩算法,并采用线程机制并行调度处理数据,以减少磁盘读写的I/O次数,可以提高磁盘数据读写性能,带来更高速有效的数据处理能力。     

自由写作提高写作流利性的研究

在输出假设和社会文化理论的基础上,实验要求受试者在每个星期至少进行两次自由写作练习,每次写完之后要数一下写出的单词数目,敦促学生提高写作速度。实验时间为四个星期。实验结果证实了输出假设以及社会文化理论的“思维语言化”促进思维发展的假说。数据表明,学生对这种训练方式认同程度很高,通过自由写作训练,学生增强了写作兴趣、写作的速度意识,有助于其提高写作流利性,并进而提高写作能力。     

对生活作文主题先行教学范式的反思与批判

生活作文教学的种种模式基本上都包含“审题——立意——选材与剪裁——表达——修改”几个关键教学环节,强调主题在作文中的优先和支配地位,拥有相同的写作学和哲学理论基础,因此属于同一种作文教学范式——“主题先行”范式.“主题先行”范式是当前生活作文教学的主导范式,尽管它受到写作理论界研究者与教学一线老师的一些批判与质疑,但都未撼动其教学主导地位.文章深入分析了该范式的理论局限和消极影响,以期能促进新范式的形成和发展,深入推进生活作文教学改革发展.     

Writing proficiency level and writing development of low-achieving adolescents: the roles of linguistic knowledge,fluency, and metacognitive knowledge

In a longitudinal design, 51 low-achieving adolescents’ development in writing proficiency from Grades 7 to 9 was measured. There were 25 native-Dutch and 26 language-minority students. In addition, the roles of (1) linguistic knowledge, (2) metacognitive knowledge, and (3) linguistic fluency in predicting both the level and development of writing proficiency were assessed. Low-achieving students improved in writing proficiency, the language-minority students more so than the native-Dutch students. Regarding the level of writing proficiency, individual differences between low achieving adolescents could be accounted for by receptive vocabulary, grammatical knowledge, and speed of sentence verification, suggesting that these are important components in low-achieving adolescents’ writing. Regarding development in writing proficiency, grammatical knowledge predicted variation between low-achieving students. Explanations and educational implications of these findings are discussed.