如何在物理新课程中实施科学探究学习的思考

探究式学习是新课程改革大力提倡的学习方式。在物理课程实施中有效开展科学探究学习,需要教师正确理解科学探究的意义,转变教学观念,树立实施科学探究式教学的信心,走出科学探究学习的认识误区,发挥在科学探究教学中的指导作用,坚持形成性评价和终结性评价相结合的学生学习评价方法。     

如何在物理新课程中实施科学探究学习的思考

探究式学习是新课程改革大力提倡的学习方式。在物理课程实施中有效开展科学探究学习，需要教师正确理解科学探究的意义，转变教学观念，树立实施科学探究式教学的信心，走出科学探究学习的认识误区，发挥在科学探究教学中的指导作用，坚持形成性评价和终结性评价相结合的学生学习评价方法。     

如何在物理新课程中实施科学探究学习的思考

探究式学习是新课程改革大力提倡的学习方式.在物理课程实施中有效开展科学探究学习,需要教师正确理解科学探究的意义,转变教学观念,树立实施科学探究式教学的信心,走出科学探究学习的认识误区,发挥在科学探究教学中的指导作用,坚持形成性评价和终结性评价相结合的学生学习评价方法.     

浅谈高中物理探究性学习

物理新课改在不断向纵深处推进的过程中,将"学习科学探究方法,发展勇于创新、实事求是的科学态度和科学精神"作为高中物理课程标准的目标。在高中物理教学中,开展探究式学习,要制定符合学生学情的探究式教学模式,处理好探究式学习与合作学习的关系,关注探究式学习在教学实施过程中的盲点。文章论述了物理探究学习的必要性和优势,重点介绍了如何利用作业设计实施探究教学。     

初中化学探究式教学中应注意的几个问题

初中化学课程标准,将科学探究作为化学课程改革的突破口,强调科学探究既是重要的学习方式和实践过程,又是主要的学习内容和学习目标。而以科学探究为中心环节的探究式教学已付诸教学实践,并取得初步成效。在探究式教学中,应注意以下几个方面的问题。一、要以情景引路科学探究是     

探究式教学应注重问题性和过程性例谈

探究式教学的主要目标是让学生通过亲身经历和体验科学探究活动,激发化学学习兴趣,增进对科学的情感,理解科学的本质,学习科学探究的方法,初步形成科学探究的能力。探究式教学中问题是核心,问题的解决是关键,问题的解决过程即学生的问题探究进程。要落实探究式化学教学,就应当注重问题性和过程性。     

浅议中学物理探究式教学

探究性学习作为与接受性学习相对应的一种学习方式,是进行创新教育的载体,是学习科学的核心方法. 探究式教学实质是将科学领域的探究模式引入课堂,通过类似科学家的探究进行学习. 根据在物理教学中探究教学的设计原则,对中学物理中所应用的探究式教学进行研究,并以实例说明在实践中如何应用探究式教学.     

物理探究式教学应注意的问题

探究式教学已成为物理课堂教学的主旋律。探究式教学有效地让学生在经历科学探究过程中,掌握物理知识与技能,学习科学探究的方法,体验科学探究的乐趣,培养学生科学探究能力、敢于提出问题、创新的精神和实事求是的科学态度。科学探究既是学生的学习目标,又是重要的教学方式之一。     

对化学探究式学习的研究

探究式学习理论所倡导的学习方式,对在科学教育中培养学生掌握科学方法、科学探究能力、解决问题能力、创新能力等方面具有非常重要的意义。在化学教学中,教师应真正从思想上认识到实施探究式学习的重要意义,从而自觉地学习、探讨探究式学习理论,准确而灵活地运用探究方式教学。     

探究式学习理论在化学教学中的应用与思考

探究式学习理论是当今最先进的学习理论之一,它所倡导的学习方式对在科学教育中培养学生掌握科学方法、科学探究能力、解决问题能力、创新能力等方面具有非常重要的意义。依据探究式学习理论并结合我国中学化学教学实际,提出在具体化学教学中切实落实好探究式学习应注意以下几点:加大宣传力度,使广大教师真正从思想上认识在教学中实施探究式学习的重要意义,从而自觉地学习、探讨探究式学习理论,对探究式学习有清醒的认识,能够在实践中准确而灵活地运用探究方式教学。     

Investigating the effects of structured and guided inquiry on students’ development of conceptual knowledge and inquiry abilities: a case study in Taiwan

In order to promote scientific inquiry in secondary schooling in Taiwan, the study developed a computer-based inquiry curriculum (including structured and guided inquiry units) and investigated how the curriculum influenced students’ science learning. The curriculum was implemented in 5 junior secondary schools in the context of a weeklong summer science course with 117 students. We first used a multi-level assessment approach to evaluate the students’ learning outcomes with the curriculum. Then, a path analysis approach was adopted for investigating at different assessment levels how the curriculum as a whole and how different types of inquiry units affected the students’ development of conceptual understandings and inquiry abilities. The results showed that the curriculum was effective in enhancing the students’ conceptual knowledge and inquiry abilities in the contexts of the six scientific topics. After the curriculum, they were able to construct interconnected scientific knowledge. The path diagrams suggested that, due to different instructional designs, the structured and guided inquiry units appeared to support the students’ learning of the topics in different ways. More importantly, they demonstrated graphically how the learning of content knowledge and inquiry ability mutually influenced one another and were reciprocally developed in a computer-based inquiry learning environment.     

中美课程标准中科学探究含义与内容的对比分析

主要针对科学探究的地位、含义、对科学探究的理解以及科学探究能力等几个方面对中美课程标准进行对比分析。比较后发现,我国标准突出特点表现在：科学探究是养成科学素养的主要手段;科学探究创设的是一个类似科学研究的情境;＂对科学探究的理解＂是把握科学探究本质的前提;＂发展科学探究能力＂是一个程式化、完整的研究过程。     

中英小学科学课程标准中的科学探究比较

中英两国科学课程标准都强调科学探究是科学课程的核心内容。小学科学课程是以培养科学素养为宗旨的科学启蒙教育课程,只有将科学探究落实到科学教学的各项任务中,才能加深学生对科学的认识。从而使学生掌握科学知识与技能、过程与方法、培养情感态度与价值观,实现科学教育的目标。比较中英两国科学课程标准,英国科学课程标准中关手科学探究的描述值得我们借鉴与学习。     

在科学探究中促进儿童解释能力的发展*——美国科学开端课程对我国儿童科学教育的启示

美国科学开端课程是以探究为核心的综合性儿童科学课程。通过科学探究活动发展儿童的解释能力是此课程的一个重要特点,这体现着当代新的科学观。科学开端课程对我国儿童科学教育有启示作用。     

科学探究课的旨趣及对探究课中两个问题的思考

科学探究是新课程改革的重要内容之一,以探究为主要学习方式和价值取向的科学探究课是新课程改革的一大亮点。科学探究课的旨趣关涉四个方面:关注人性、问题至上、过程即目的、交流与合作。明晰探究课的旨趣所在,有利于正确处理探究课教学中出现的教师教与学生学、教学内容多与探究时间少的矛盾。     

Understanding The Impact of an Apprenticeship-Based Scientific Research Program on High School Students’ Understanding of Scientific Inquiry

The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of an apprenticeship program on high school students’ understanding of the nature of scientific inquiry. Data related to seventeen students’ understanding of science and scientific inquiry were collected through open-ended questionnaires. Findings suggest that although engagement in authentic scientific research helped the participants to develop competency in experimentation methods it had limited impact on participants’ learning of the implicit aspects of scientific inquiry and NOS. Discussion focuses on the importance of making the implicit assumptions of science explicit to the students in such authentic scientific inquiry settings through structured curriculum.     

浅议初中化学课堂探究学习的有效性

义务教育化学学科,以科学探究作为课程改革的突破口,强调科学探究是一种重要而有效的学习方式,又是义务教育阶段化学课程的重要学习内容。在课堂教学中合理利用资源,真正体现＂教为主导,学为主体＂,提高探究学习的有效性。     

The Proof of the Pudding?: A Case Study of an “At-Risk” Design-Based Inquiry Science Curriculum

When students collaboratively design and build artifacts that require relevant understanding and application of science, many aspects of scientific literacy are developed. Design-based inquiry (DBI) is one such pedagogy that can serve these desired goals of science education well. Focusing on a Projectile Science curriculum previously found to be implemented with satisfactory fidelity, we investigate the many hidden challenges when using DBI with Grade 8 students from one school in Singapore. A case study method was used to analyze video recordings of DBI lessons conducted over 10 weeks, project presentations, and interviews to ascertain the opportunities for developing scientific literacy among participants. One critical factor that hindered learning was task selection by teachers, which emphasized generic scientific process skills over more important cognitive and epistemic learning goals. Teachers and students were also jointly engaged in forms of inquiry that underscored artifact completion over deeper conceptual and epistemic understanding of science. Our research surfaced two other confounding factors that undermined the curriculum; unanticipated teacher effects and the underestimation of the complexity of DBI and of inquiry science in general. Thus, even though motivated or experienced teachers can implement an inquiry science curriculum with good fidelity and enjoy school-wide support, these by themselves will not guarantee deep learning of scientific literacy in DBI. Recommendations are made for navigating the hands- and minds-on aspects of learning science that is an asset as well as inherent danger during DBI teaching.     

模拟软件促进科学课程探究学习的作用分析

科学探究学习是创新教育的重要途径和科学学习的主要途径。模拟软件在创设自主探究学习环境和有效引导探究活动两个方面促进科学探究学习,涉及探究对象动态视觉化表征的作用、类型和方式;可操纵情境和关联的表征物在科学探究中的作用;模拟环境中科学探究活动的程序,探究活动中的指导。     

The Spectrum of Dynamic Inquiry Teaching Practices

The Israeli high school biology curriculum comprises the Biomind program, in which students are engaged in an open inquiry learning process. The dynamic features of open inquiry often pose challenges to teachers in implementing the Biomind program. The current qualitative research shows that facilitating students in a dynamic open inquiry process is multidimensional. Teaching practices cover a wide range of methods, from structured inquiry through guided inquiry to open inquiry. An individual teacher’s profile can be elucidated on the basis of this spectrum. In addition, we realised that teachers often encounter several difficulties in implementing open dynamic inquiry: A dearth of teachers’ scientific knowledge, students’ lack of scientific knowledge and skills, and a restrictive time-frame. This study suggests several areas which should be considered while implementing an on going professional development support for teachers who are engaged in open inquiry teaching.