基于“四重境界”的“互联网+档案”建设策略研究

“互联网+档案”应是当前档案服务发展的目标。应在了解档案部门实际状况与档案用户痛点问题的基础上,以“四重境界”精益迭代模式推进“互联网+档案”建设,并应用霍尔三维模型生成“互联网+档案”建设策略体系。     

年鉴编纂“纸屏互动”新模式研究

本文围绕年鉴数字化和智慧城市建设,从读者的角度出发,以当前年鉴遇到的现实问题切入,为改善传统纸质年鉴编用脱节、互动性不强、社会服务较弱等问题,研究探索阅读延伸模式、书影融合模式、增值服务模式等纸屏互动新模式,让年鉴“活”起来,为推进中国文化走出去及“中国之治”提供借鉴。     

Words matter: interpretations and implications of “para” in paraprofessional

Objective:While studies from the early 1990s show that library staff in nonlibrarian roles interpret the term “paraprofessional” as being demeaning to their roles, no recent research has been conducted on this topic. This study aims to investigate if health sciences library staff continue to have similar negative associations with the term “paraprofessional” and to determine if another term is preferred.Methods:The authors conducted a literature review to identify terms used to categorize library staff in nonlibrarian roles. Using these terms, we created an online Qualtrics survey asking participants to rank terms by preference. We distributed the survey via thirty-six professional email discussion lists, including MEDLIB-L, thirty-three MLA chapter and caucus email discussion lists, DOCLINE-L, and ACRL-HSIG-L. Survey participants included full-time and part-time health sciences library staff in any nonlibrarian position. Responses from librarians were not accepted.Results:Based on 178 completed surveys, “library staff” was the top choice of 49% of participants, over “other” (19%), “paraprofessional” (13%), “library support staff” (11%), “paralibrarian” (7%), and “nonprofessional” (1%). Although “library staff” was the top choice of participants across all ages, older participants (aged 45–75) preferred “library support staff” and “paraprofessional” to a greater degree than younger participants (aged 18–44), while younger participants preferred “other” to a greater degree. Out of 36 participants who specifically mentioned the terms “paraprofessional” or “paralibrarian,” 32 (89%) of those comments were negative, indicating that the “para” in “paraprofessional” and “paralibrarian” is either insulting, inapplicable, or unfamiliar.Conclusions:Our results suggest that although the term “paraprofessional” may not intentionally be used to demean library staff, many library staff interpret the term to be demeaning to their roles. Instead, “library staff,” a more inclusive and less divisive term, was preferred by survey participants. In accordance with our results, we believe the term “paraprofessional” should no longer be used in library and information scholarly literature or professional discourse.     

“互联网+”下档案信息化安全建设研究

随着国家“互联网+”计划的提出,档案信息化建设得到加速推进,安全建设作为其基础性、保障性工作,重要性不言而喻。本文首先分析了档案信息化建设面临的系统漏洞和网络攻击两大安全威胁,之后总结了档案信息系统在基础网络、计算环境、应用系统、数据资源和用户访问几个层面存在的安全隐患,然后分别从网络、终端、应用、数据、用户等几个方面提出了对应的行之有效的安全防护建设措施,最后提出了下一步工作方向。     

“一个人与一个学科”—— 甘乃光档案思想述评

行政效率运动为中国近代档案学的产生提供了理论土壤与实践根基,文书档案改革作为行政效率的“突破口”,不仅推动了行政效率运动的深化,而且促进了档案学理论和实践的发展。作为行政效率运动的倡议者和组织者以及文书档案改革的推行者,甘乃光对于档案学成为一门独立学科居功至伟。研究甘乃光的档案思想不仅可以厘清档案学科的源流,而且对于档案学科的创新和持久发展具有重要意义。     

受众选择“3S”理论视域下档案信息轻量化传播分析

随着在档案领域的深化应用,轻量化传播中重复率高、新鲜度低、用户黏度低等问题逐渐显露,并为档案人所关注。针对这些问题,档案人应增强信息的原创性与新颖度,创新信息的传播方式与传播形式,提升信息的凝练程度,增强信息的趣味性、易读性、可行性、适用性,并注重多媒体匹配度,提高信息服务的质量,提供定制化信息服务,营造出亲密随意的传播氛围,最终提升其传播质量,以便更高效、优质地满足受众的信息需求。     

“历史层累”阐述—— 传统村落档案研究语境的真实性探析

传统村落档案研究有不同的历史语境,不单是当代的现代化语境。本文用“历史层累”法阐述近现代传统村落的变迁,追溯现代化潮流、社会主义改造、近代反封建及乡土中国四个历史语境,说明传统村落档案研究的可能的时代背景,从而分析研究其语境的真实性。     

“信息可视化”专辑简介

张进博士现任美国威斯康星大学密尔沃基分校信息研究学院副教授,曾任武汉大学教授,情报科学系系副主任。张进博士的主要研究领域包括：情报检索可视化、情报检索算法、Internet搜索引擎、Internet源信息组织、数字图书馆、人机接口等课题项目。这次应本刊邀请特为国内广大读者组织专栏稿件。编辑部代表广大读者对张进博士为本刊所组的信息可视化专辑表示衷心的感谢!     

“985”高校图书馆资源整合策略研究

以11所“985”高校图书馆为样本,通过非介入式调查（包括图书馆实地考察、网站调研、图书馆发现系统调查）对各个图书馆资源整合的现状和问题进行调研,并采取访谈法获取这些高校图书馆领导层对资源整合的策略、态度和看法。对“985”高校图书馆资源整合的系统梳理对我国其他高校图书馆资源整合工作具有很强的指导意义。     

ǿ���鱨��ʶ ������ѧ����——�����׼��������á��γ̵ĸĸ�����

通过考察《文献检索与利用》课程的现状、学生的学习动机和学习方法，提出了对《文献检索与利用》课题进行教材和教学方法改革的设想。     

阅览室管理程序——MELINETS接口程序

阅览室管理在图书馆管理中是个很重要的环节, 而在图书馆自动化系统中始终是个薄弱环节, 为改善阅览室管理的模式我们开发编制了阅览室管理程序, 用以记录读者进室情况和阅览文献情况; 程序输入文献典藏条码和读者条码, 并按图书分类法对文献进行统计, 按读者类型对读者进行统计。为提高阅览室管理水平提供了一个有用的工具。     

Revitalizing the Debate between <Life> and <Choice>: The 2004 March for Women's Lives

The contemporary U.S. debate over abortion has been waged as a battle between <life> and <choice>. The author traces the development of these ideographs, arguing that through their verbal and visual strategies, advocates on both sides of the issue have rendered ideographic meaning concrete. Whereas the fixed definitions have served the cause of <life> well, they have been detrimental for <choice>, leading advocates to seek out ways to revitalize the debate. The 2004 March for Women's Lives was a key event in this larger effort; through it, participants revitalized the abortion debate, bringing renewed flexibility to the ideograph <choice> at the same time it challenged the fixed status, and the veracity, of the ideograph <life>.     

Research agenda for social Q&A

As new venues of information and tools for information access are emerging, people's online information seeking behavior is dramatically evolving. While a majority of well-established and classical models of information seeking and behavior are still valid, there is a growing need to study and explain novel information sources and information seeking behaviors that are unique to these sources. One emerging domain is social question and answer (Q&A). This article develops a research agenda for social Q&A, reviewing recent studies and identifying core issues, questions, and challenges.