美国教育认证体系对我国专业学位研究生教育认证的启示

教育认证是提升和保障专业学位教育质量的重要途径。美国教育认证体系发展已经相对成熟和规范,在教育质量提升和人才培养方面发挥了重要的作用。文章从基本框架、法律法规、认可和认证机构、认证标准、认证流程等五个方面阐述了美国教育认证体系;分析了美国教育认证体系网络化、专业化和标准化的特征;从中得到启发,并结合我国专业学位教育认证实际情况,从五个方面对构建具有中国特色的专业学位教育认证体系提出建议,并介绍我国石油与天然气工程领域工程硕士研究生教育认证的情况。     

工程硕士教育认证：通用标准与测量方法

基于欧美国家主要工程教育认证标准的文本分析,研制了我国工程硕士教育认证的通用标准,包括知识掌握、实践创新能力、专业精神与职业道德、可迁移能力四个维度十项指标,并提出了相应的测度方法。构建工程硕士教育认证专业标准,推动工程硕士教育认证的试点,必须充分汇聚政府、高校、行业学会和企业的改革合力。     

我国工程硕士教育实施专业认证的问题与对策

通过对国内工程硕士教育专业认证的发展状况、组织制度、实施成效等方面的调查研究,结合西方国家硕士层次工程教育开展专业认证的经验,从认证组织、认证标准、认证程序、认证报告制度等方面对我国当前工程硕士教育专业认证存在的问题进行了分析和探讨。     

工程教育认证的实践与思考

阐述了工程教育认证的必要性和合理性.以及对工程人才成长所发挥的作用;介绍了工程硕士教育认证主要做法;讨论了工程教育认证在制订标准、组织构架、认证规则和方法等方面的若干策略.提出应紧密围绕知识、能力和素质三方面积极开展工程教育认证.     

工程硕士教育与设备监理职业资格认证合作的探索与实践

工程硕士教育与设备监理职业资格认证的对接是工程硕士教育与国内职业资格认证的首次合作,对于拓宽工程硕士培养类型,有针对性地加强应用型工程人才培养,有效弥补设备监理人员队伍高层次人才不足的问题,提升我国设备监理人员综合素质和竞争力,确保重大工程项目质量意义重大。二者的成功合作将为深入推进工程硕士与国内其它职业资格认证的合作提供重要参考。     

博洛尼亚进程后欧洲工程教育专业认证的发展研究——以欧洲工程教育认证网络为例

博洛尼亚进程对欧洲高等工程教育专业认证产生了重要的影响,本文以欧洲工程教育认证网络(ENAEE)及欧洲工程教育专业认证(EUR-ACE?)体系的出现和发展为切入点,分析了其历史、背景、组织结构、认证标准,及其与欧洲各国工程教育专业认证之间的关系,并将EUR-ACE?认证体系与华盛顿协议进行了比较,发现EUR-ACE?体系在欧洲层面建立起了一种分散式的第一阶段和第二阶段统一的认证体系。EUR-ACE?体系既强调灵活性和兼容性,又努力保证各国的多样性。     

建构我国工程师职业资格认证制度 推动工程硕士教育与职业资格衔接

工程硕士专业学位研究生教育必须与相应的工程领域职业资格相衔接,而这种衔接困难重重、步履维艰。高层次工程技术人才的工程师职业资格认证是解决工程硕士研究生教育与职业资格相衔接的根本保证。结合我国目前的实际情况,应当构建政府支持与引导下的由培养单位的专家与企业行业的专家共同组成的职业资格认证管理体系。     

我国工程硕士教育与职业资格认证对接案例的启示

介绍了工程硕士教育与职业资格认证对接的四个案例.结合四个案例,阐述了进一步推进我国工程硕士教育与职业资格认证对接的几点启示.     

工程硕士教育与区域职业资格认证相衔接的探索与实践

从理论探索与实践经验两个方面论证了从区域层面将工程硕士教育与职业资格认证相衔接,不仅有必要而且切实可行,由此最终形成集政府、高校、行业协会、企业为一体的有机合作培养体系,以回归工程硕士教育初衷,保障工程硕士培养质量,促进我国工程硕士教育与国际接轨,实现工程硕士教育可持续发展。     

我国工程硕士教育与工程师职业资格认证对接的思考

阐述了工程硕士研究生教育的属性,从三个方面论述了工程硕士研究生教育与工程师职业资格认证相对接的必要性,提出了工程硕士教育与工程师职业资格认证相对接的建议。     

CACREP Accreditation Intentions

The authors discuss results of a national survey, conducted by the AACD Committee for Standards Review, of counselor preparation programs regarding their intentions related to CACREP accreditation. Programs were separated into four groups: Group 1—programs that held CACREP accreditation; Group 2—programs with definite intentions of seeking CACREP accreditation; Group 3—programs that were uncertain whether they would pursue CACREP accreditation; and Group 4—programs that did not anticipate seeking CACREP accreditation. Data were analyzed for patterns of response across groups. Size and type of program and reasons central to program decisions concerning accreditation provided focus for the study. Implications of the findings are discussed.     

Demystifying Accreditation: Action Plans for a National or Regional Accreditation

As part of educational reform, many institutions of higher education are undergoing accreditation processes. Based on interviews, observations, and the author's experiences in accreditation reviews, this discussion delineates three stages of planning for an accreditation process. Recommendations are organized by each stage of preparation into long- and short-term action plans with specific tasks. Analyzing the process of accreditation across institutions and programs led to the identification of common elements that can make planning an accreditation effective and efficient. This article maps the roles and responsibilities of accreditation stakeholders and the need for communication and collaboration throughout the process.Ann L. Wood earned a Ph.D. in educational psychology from The University of Michigan and a M.A. in special education and a B.A. in sociology, psychology, and education from Michigan State University. She is currently the Co-Principal Investigator for the Comprehensive Teacher Education Institute and an Assistant Professor in the Charter College of Education at California State University, Los Angeles. Her special interests are educational reform, urban education, lives of faculty and teachers, higher education, teacher development, and teacher induction     

Accreditation in Turkish universities

In Turkey, students are more and more willing to participate in the global free movement of students and of high-skilled labour after their graduation. This is why they request international accreditation from universities. Therefore, accreditation is one of the parameters that play an important role in students' university selection. On the other hand, Turkey is aiming to be a European Union member. This imposes institutional legal and civil arrangements and harmonization. Also, the general trend of globalization dictates requirements from university graduates that are answered in best business practice in which accreditation is a major component. In this paper, accreditation efforts to achieve international recognition for Turkish universities are discussed. For this purpose information on higher education is given. Attempts for accreditation on licensure through FEANI is explained. Accreditation on department programmes by ABET (USA) and by an engineering institution (UK) are discussed and their similarities are pinpointed. Also, a Turkish, British and World Bank quality assessment pilot project for education and research is discussed.     

Social Work Accreditation:

This study reports on how the social work education accreditation process is perceived and experienced by a national sample of graduate and baccalaureate social work programs. Respondents, mainly program directors, identify cost and benefits and share problems. Suggestions for how the system can be improved are included.     

自动化专业认证标准与自动化系统工程师资格认证的相符度及其衔接

工程教育专业认证是提高工程专业教学质量而推行的一项重要措施。本文分析了自动化专业认证标准与自动化系统工程师资格认证考试要求的相符度,并对自动化专业认证制度和自动化系统工程师资格认证制度之间的衔接提出了几点建议,以期为二者的全面实施提供一定的借鉴和参考。     

Accreditation,the Bologna Process and National Reactions: Accreditation as Concept and Action

This article examines accreditation as a component of the Bologna Process quality policy. The focus is on an analysis of the concept of accreditation in policy documents from four countries (Finland, the Netherlands, France and Sweden). The article focuses on the following questions: (i) how does accreditation appear, as a concept and as action, in national reports, produced for the purposes of the Ministerial meetings?; and (ii) how is accreditation presented, as a concept and as action, in the national context and for national actors?