小议网络文献作为引文

本文在阐述网络文献和网络引文的基础上，提出网络文献成为引文还存在的问题，由此进一步提出在网络引文的著录上应采取的措施，指出应尽快对这一现象进行研究和规范。     

引文分析在期刊管理中的应用

期刊管理作为一门软科学，在过去很大程度上仍处于经验型管理的范畴，如何使期刊选购、管理更加系统完整，让有限的期刊资源发挥更大的作用。本文试图从文献计量学、统计学的角度，来分析学术论文中参考文献的引用规律，从而为期刊管理的科学化、规范化找出计量依据。     

试论引文分析的作用

首先从引及引分析的定义入手，接着提出了参考献录规范化是引分析的前提，指出了引分析的重要作用，最后探讨了引分析存在的一些不足。     

从引文分析看网络结构挖掘

网络结构挖掘思想源自于引文分析，本文在阐述引文分析的原理及作用的基础上，分析了网络结构挖掘的原理和作用。目前，网络结构挖掘技术已经在搜索引擎中得到了初步的应用，并取得了很好的效果。     

PageRank variants in the evaluation of citation networks

This paper explores a possible approach to a research evaluation, by calculating the renown of authors of scientific papers. The evaluation is based on the citation analysis and its results should be close to a human viewpoint. The PageRank algorithm and its modifications were used for the evaluation of various types of citation networks. Our main research question was whether better evaluation results were based directly on an author network or on a publication network. Other issues concerned, for example, the determination of weights in the author network and the distribution of publication scores among their authors. The citation networks were extracted from the computer science domain in the ISI Web of Science database. The influence of self-citations was also explored. To find the best network for a research evaluation, the outputs of PageRank were compared with lists of prestigious awards in computer science such as the Turing and Codd award, ISI Highly Cited and ACM Fellows. Our experiments proved that the best ranking of authors was obtained by using a publication citation network from which self-citations were eliminated, and by distributing the same proportional parts of the publications’ values to their authors. The ranking can be used as a criterion for the financial support of research teams, for identifying leaders of such teams, etc.     

A business citation analysis: A local follow-up study

While there is no official style for business writing, the most common citation style in business research has not been determined previously. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the top scholarly business journals to determine the most commonly used citation style in business academic research. The author used the list of 452 top business journals included in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) Journal Citation Report. The results show that 69% of business journals use a publisher-dictated style, whereas of the “traditional” citation styles, 11% use the American Psychological Association style, 10% use Harvard style, 8% use Chicago style, and none use Modern Language Association style.     

Trends in the use of ISI citation databases for evaluation

This paper explores the factors shaping the current uses of the ISI citation databases in evaluation both of journals and of individual scholars and their institutions. Given the intense focus on outcomes evaluation, in a context of increasing ‘democratization’ of metrics in today's digital world, it is easy to lose focus on the appropriate ways to use these resources, and misuse can result.     

我国四大引文数据库及其期刊引证报告的比较研究

文章对我国四大引文数据库及其期刊引证报告的发展和现状做了简要总结。对这四大引文数据库极其引证报告的特色进行了比较,指出了四大引文数据库及其引证报告的不足,并提出了改进的建议与措施。     

网络阅读中迷航现象的认知解析

网络阅读已然成为阅读的新天地,但由于网络非线性、超媒体等特性,迷航现象成了影响网络阅读绩效的一大障碍。从认知的角度探析迷航现象的表现、成因及解决策略是解决这一难题的重要途径。     

On the relationships between bibliographic characteristics of scientific documents and citation and Mendeley readership counts: A large-scale analysis of Web of Science publications

In this paper we present a first large-scale analysis of the relationship between Mendeley readership and citation counts with particular documents’ bibliographic characteristics. A data set of 1.3 million publications from different fields published in journals covered by the Web of Science (WoS) has been analyzed. This work reveals that document types that are often excluded from citation analysis due to their lower citation values, like editorial materials, letters, news items, or meeting abstracts, are strongly covered and saved in Mendeley, suggesting that Mendeley readership can reliably inform the analysis of these document types. Findings show that collaborative papers are frequently saved in Mendeley, which is similar to what is observed for citations. The relationship between readership and the length of titles and number of pages, however, is weaker than for the same relationship observed for citations. The analysis of different disciplines also points to different patterns in the relationship between several document characteristics, readership, and citation counts. Overall, results highlight that although disciplinary differences exist, readership counts are related to similar bibliographic characteristics as those related to citation counts, reinforcing the idea that Mendeley readership and citations capture a similar concept of impact, although they cannot be considered as equivalent indicators.     

引文分析在图书馆期刊馆藏资源建设中的作用 --济南大学应用化学专业硕士论文引文分析研究

论文时济南大学应用化学专业2001～2004硕士研究生学位论文引文的数量、语种、类型、年代及该专业的文献半衰期进行了统计分析，时引文量最大的外文期刊进行排序并考察其在本校的收藏情况，从而掌握本校的期刊保障率，为馆藏期刊资源建设提供了参考依据。