Open Access中文译名探讨

搜集统计了国内目前现有的“Open Access”中文译名，根据全国科学技术名词审定委员会的《科学技术名词审定的原则及方法》，对“Open Access”的中文译名进行了剖析，从科学性、通俗性、习惯性以及语义的准确性等方面说明了目前绝大多数“Open Access”中文译名的不妥之处，提出“Open Access”较适宜的中文译名应为“开放访问”。     

Analysis of Open Access Landscape

This paper is created by bounding 5 editorials of Public Library of Science （PLoS） which have written on various aspects of open access. It covers wide range topics of important open access issues, such as from paying for open access to copyright to open access as a public issue, which may be more or less of interest of our audience.     

Open Access for Scholarly Books?

Over the past two decades, sales of monographs have shrunk by 90?% causing prices to rise dramatically as fewer copies are sold. University libraries struggle to assemble adequate collections, and students and scholars are deprived access, especially in the developing world. Open access can play an important role in ensuring both access to knowledge and encouraging the growth of new markets for scholarly books. This article argues that by facilitating a truly global approach to funding the up-front costs of publishing and open access, there is a sustainable future for the specialist academic ??long form publication??. Knowledge Unlatched is a new initiative that is creating an international library consortium through which publishers will be able to recover their fixed costs while at the same time reducing prices for libraries.     

OA(Open Access)之辩

OA的迅速兴起,在给研究人员带来极大方便的同时,也给许多出版机构带来了巨大的威胁.因此学术与商业之间就OA的争辩由此兴起并日渐激烈.笔者最近在BIOMED CENTRAL上发现一些非常有趣的辩论,辩论者既有大公司的CEO,也不乏出版领域的“巨无霸“,现编译出来,以飨读者.……     

试析Open Access对大学图书馆的影响

主要介绍作为学术资源开放传播新模式的开放获取运动内容，并针对大学图书馆的资源采购、馆藏建设、服务以及角色定位，讨论开放获取运动对大学图书馆的影响。     

谁能为Open Access做贡献?

编者按: 　　Open Access自出现以来,受到广泛关注并得以迅速发展,越来越多学者和机构参与到这一全新的出版传播模式中来,越来越多的人受益于Open Access.那么,享受Open Access带来的便利之余,我们是否应该考虑这样的问题:究竟哪些人能为Open Access做贡献呢?本文的内容将帮助读者对此有深入的了解和认识.……     

学术期刊实现Open Access出版的模式与平台

介绍目前在学术出版界广为讨论的Open Access出版模式,指出Open Access对学术期刊发展的意义。同时介绍国内以期刊编辑部为主体的Open Access出版的概况和特点。结合目前国内流行的Open Access出版平台软件的功能,说明Open Access出版的技术基础,为期刊编辑部建立Open Access出版平台提供参考。     

隆德大学启动Open Access期刊目录(DOAJ)二期工程

隆德大学图书馆整理了一份Open Access期刊目录(the Directory of Open Access Journals,DOAJ),网址为www.doaj.org.新版本的DOAJ包括了文章级别的记录和搜索功能,用户可以在所有可能的Open Access期刊中搜索文章.这个目录现在包括超过1100种open access高质量科学和学术电子期刊信息,可以在网上免费获取.这1100种期刊中的270种已经可以在文章级别搜索,而且这两个数字都在增长.研究者现在可以通过DOAJ搜索将近46000篇文章,并可以获取全文.……     

我国高校学报Open Access现状调查与分析

对2007年版《中国科技期刊引证报告》(核心版)收录的291种高校学报的开放存取(Open Access,OA)状况进行了调查。结果显示:291种学报中自建网站的185种,占63.6%;实现全文OA的34种,占11.7%,其中,有26种学报为读者提供了论文的即时OA,有8种学报的OA滞后半年或以上。全文OA回溯至创刊之初的只有2种,分别是《清华大学学报》(1915年创刊)和《南京农业大学学报》(1956年创刊);回溯至2000年以后的最多,为29种,有9种从2007年才开始实行OA。调查中还发现,在网站上仅有论文摘要的学报44种,仅有题名信息的学报43种。还对高校学报实现OA的可行性和必要性进行了分析。     

简析开放存取(Open Access)及其发展

分析了“开放存取”的译名及其相关概念、开放存取在国际图书情报界的发展，以及目前在我国的发展状况。     

原生数字期刊与Open Access期刊比较研究

原生数字期刊和Open Access期刊是网络技术普及和学术交流观念变革下出现的新型连续出版物,两者既有区别又有联系,易混淆。从产生背景、概念界定、出版模式、发行方式、版权形式、质量控制等方面对原生数字期刊和Open Access期刊进行比较探讨,得出对原生数字期刊和Open Access期刊的较全面的认识,最后对两者发展的侧重点进行阐述。     

Open Access能否提升期刊和文献的影响度？

Open Access是期刊出版界的一个十分年轻的概念,它对学术交流的传统模式提出了颠覆性的挑战,成为当前出版界特别是数字图书馆界讨论的热门话题.但讨论的焦点几乎都集中在其传播的有效性上,关于这种出版模式对期刊和文献影响方面涉及甚少.本文就Open Access能否提升期刊和文献的影响度这个问题进行了探讨,借鉴国外的最新研究结果,并对此进行评述分析,希起到抛砖引玉的作用.     

DOAJ(the Directory of Open Access Journals)介绍

编者按:　　目前,OA期刊如雨后春笋般纷纷创办起来.面对数量不断剧增加的OA期刊,支持OA的作者如何了解本领域中哪些期刊采用了open access模式?用户能免费使用哪些期刊的内容?其它的出版商可以免费获取哪些期刊的元数据?DOAJ为这些问题提供了答案,本文将对DOAJ进行一个较详细地介绍,以期对作者和用户等有所帮助.……     

2008年开放存取（Open Access）年度进展

2008年开放存取（Open Access,简称OA）有了很大的发展,文章试图向读者做一个全面的介绍,但又不得不承认一篇文章是不可能完成的。我将会分9个章节选出一些实例,有些我以前提到的细节会被略过,比如开放教育,公共信息（PSJ）和维基等,一如往常,对没有提及的OA项目表示歉意。     

高校图书馆基于Open Access学术信息交流服务刍议

OA是一种全新理念的网络出版模式和学术信息交流模式.论文探讨了高校图书馆学术信息交流在OA环境中所面临的机遇和挑战,具体分析了OA的影响,以及高校图书馆应如何利用OA提升服务能力和质量.     

ICOLC、SPARC与SEP合作一起支持Open Access

学者出版物与学术资源联盟SPARC目前正与国际图书馆联盟协会(ICOLC,International Coalition of Library Consortia)-起合作支持一次创造性的努力,即聚集图书馆的力量支持斯坦福哲学百科全书(SEP,Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)的长期开放式访问.该项目的初步目标是筹集足够的资金以支付SEP持续运作的费用以及维持它在公共因特网上可以被免费访问.……     

Publishing in Open Access Education Journals: The Authors’ Perspectives

Open access publishing is now an accepted method of scholarly communication. However, the greatest traction for open access publishing thus far has been in the sciences. Penetration of open access publishing has been much slower among the social sciences. This study surveys 309 authors from recent issues of open access journals in education to determine why they choose to publish in open access journals and to gain insight into the ways publishing practices within the discipline itself impact the willingness of authors to engage in open access publishing.     

Open Access Publishing in Business Research: The Authors’ Perspective

Open access (OA) publishing is now accepted as an integral part of the emerging trends within scholarly communication. Business librarians, like their subject specialist colleagues in other disciplines, are increasingly called upon to interpret scholarly communication trends to their faculty. This study surveys 1,293 business faculty from American schools of business accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. Issues explored include business faculty publishing practices within the discipline and how these affect academic advancement, obtaining articles for their own research, electronic publishing, self-archiving, and their perceptions about OA publishing generally.     

What is Open Access Button? An interview with Joe McArthur

Articles published behind a paywall in commercial journals are often inaccessible to potential readers who are not affiliated with a subscribing institution. Open Access Button is an application that assists readers in finding Open Access versions of such articles. This service works in a completely legal fashion. This interview is with one of the co-founders of the service, Joe McArthur. Open Access Button is supported by the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition.