美国的因特网资源组织

将美国因特网编目的发展过程划分的三个时期,并对每个时期出现的重大项目、编目技术的特点以及研究的问题作出阐述与分析,旨在为我国图书馆界研究与开发因特网编目技术提供借鉴与参考。     

中美百科全书索引体系的比较研究

探讨了中美两国大型综合性百科全书索引体系所涉及的款目结构、编排方式、检索功能等理论和编制中存在的实际问题,以加强百科全书索引体系的理论研究和促进实际的索引编制工作     

ARGENTINE ATTITUDES TOWARD THE UNITED STATES

Survey research from the larger cities of Argentina during the1960s and the 1980s demonstrates a consistent level of antagonismtoward the United States by at least a fifth of urban Argentines.Hostility increased when the United States sided against Argentinain the Malvinas (Falklands) War of 1982, but it declined from1983 to 1988 under the conciliatory policies adopted by thegovernments of Raúl Alfonsín and Ronald Reagan.Asking identical questions of urban residents in Brazil indicatesstrikingly similar patterns of attitude. Antagonism tends tofocus upon specific elements of United States government policyin Latin America, while little hostility is expressed towardthe people of the United States. In contrast to foreign policyinitiatives, elements of the culture, the political freedoms,and the economic and educational opportunities of the UnitedStates are clearly admired in Argentina.     

THE I-SCHOOL CONCEPT IN THE UNITED STATES AND BEYOND

信息学院(i-school)在当今美国图书情报学(LIS)教育史中具有重要作用.本文明确了信息学院的关键特征,并描述其如何帮助定位图书情报学教育长期面临的挑战.以"人、信息、技术"为中心,信息学院已经在科研和教学中建立了强大的多学科项目,结果获得学科地位提升、交叉学科伙伴、学生入学增多和较强的经费支持.在美国以外的地方也正在出现类似信息学院的模式,可见于中国、印度、日本、新加坡和德国.参考文献12.     

美国一流大学及其图书馆调研报告

按照一流大学应具有一流学科、一流教师和一流学生的思路用三个指标筛选出了10所美国一流大学,陈述了美国一流大学图书馆的资源特征、人员特征、经费特征服务特征和发展特征,对中国建设一流大学和一流大学图书馆提出了参考建议。     

古典文献学与现代文献学的交融-评潘树广等著《文献学纲要》

文献学的学科体系，历来有“古典”与“现代”之分。古典文献学以古籍为主要研究对象，以目录学、版本学、校勘学为三大支柱；现代文献学则以急剧增长的多语种文献为主要研究对象，以现代信息技术尤其是计算机网络为依托。长期以来，研究“古典”与“现代”形成两支队伍，他们各有强项与弱项。 学科的分割与学术队伍的划疆而治，不利于健全和发展完整意义的文献学学科体系。因而，自80年代中期以来，不少学者为建立“兼容古今”的系统的文献学（或称大文献学）作了许多有益的理论探讨。例如林申清先生说：“建立一门能够兼容古今的系统的文…     

中美大学图书馆电子资源利用调查之比较研究

分析了中美大学图书馆对教职员及部分博、硕士生的问卷调查结果,指出加大对新的电子资源的宣传、提高用户情报意识、提供各种培训机会和远程检索方法,根据用户的需求进行合理的预算,及时调整和重构藏书体系和高效的服务体系,已成为中外大学图书馆的当务之急。     

VALUE-FRAMING ABORTION IN THE UNITED STATES: AN APPLICATION OF MEDIA SYSTEM DEPENDENCY THEORY

This paper is in the tradition of social analysis aimed at creatingframeworks to join mass media and public opinion processes (e.g.Clarke and Evans, 1983; Gamson, 1975; Gitlin, 1980; Hall, 1977;Iyengar and Kinder, 1987; Lang and Lang, 1968, 1983; Lippman,1922; Mollotch and Lester, 1974; Noelle-Neuman, 1974; Paletzand Entman, 1981; Shaw and McCombs, 1977; Turner and Paz, 1986).After a brief review of media system dependency (MSD) theory,we illustrate how it may apply to public opinion processes thatentail contested issue ‘value-frames’ (Ball-Rokeachand Rokeach, 1987). In such cases, the media system is directlyimplicated in the negotiation of legitimacy of opposing positionson an issue. Our illustrative case is the abortion issue asit has been played out in the United States over recent decades(Luker, 1984). We focus upon the respective capacities of pro-and anti-abortion movements to control the value-frame of mediacoverage of the issue (Guthrie, 1989). A value-frame may beconceived as ‘... the main substantive theme of a moralityplay’ (Ball-Rokeach and Tallman, 1979) wherein the distinctionbetween ‘good’ and ‘bad’ hangs in thebalance; in this case, between positions on abortion. We suggestthat change in the value-frame of media coverage and publicdiscourse may be understood, at least in part, as an outcomeof change in contestants' MSD relations.     

美国近年来图情专业课程设置与教学方式分析

美国图书情报专业教育历史较长,目前发展势头良好,为了探究其内在原因,使我国的专业教育有所借鉴,作者在对美国图书情报学院综合考察的基础上,结合个案研究和亲身体验,从课程设置和教学方式的角度总结和分析了其特点。     

上海会审公廨证章

笔者收藏中国近现代历史证章多年,有幸收集到晚清时期的上海会审公廨证章。     

试评《美国馆际互借法》(2001年修订本)

文章通过《美国国家馆际互借法》(1993年制订)与《美国馆际互借法》(2001年修订)两个文本的对比与分析,试图探讨美国图书馆馆际互借服务发展的过程与趋势,阐明馆际互借服务立法的重要性,以唤起我国图书馆界对馆际互借立法工作的关注和重视。     

中美两国高校图书馆管理之比较

比较了中美两国高校图书馆在机构设置 ,人事管理 ,馆藏资源的购置和布局 ,读者服务的内容和方式 ,经费及其筹措渠道等五个方面的异同 ,探讨了这些异同点产生的原因 ,提出了弥补差距的办法     

CULTURAL DIFFERENCES IN LISTENING STYLE PREFERENCES: A COMPARISON OF YOUNG ADULTS IN GERMANY, ISRAEL, AND THE UNITED STATES

Do the listening styles preferred by young adults in Germany,Israel, and the USA differ significantly? In order to addressthis question, college students in all three countries completedversions of the Listening Styles Profile (LSP; Watson et al.1995) presented in their native languages. Factor analysis revealedfour predominant constructs underlying the LSP, which were designatedas people, action, content, and time listening styles. Comparisonsbetween the three cultures revealed distinctively differentpatterns of listening style preferences, with Germans preferringthe action style, Israelis endorsing the content style, andAmericans favoring both the people and time styles.