Subsequent Demand for Ripped-Off Journal Articles

During the past 15 years academic libraries have experienced an epidemic of thefts of journal articles and issues. Since 1975, the SUNY Stony Brook Library Periodicals Reading Room has operated a "Ripoff File" of copies of articles that readers have reported missing from the bound volumes of periodicals in the bookstacks where books and serials in general subjects, humanities and social sciences are housed. Analysis of records kept 1978-87 shows that 9 percent of the current journal titles appear in the file; that humanities articles are less used than the social science materials and that within the social science psychology journals are the most ripped off and the most wanted subsequently. Ripoff rates and subsequent usage are predictable from previous trends and, in the social sciences, are positively associated with the number of students enrolled in related programs.     

Periodical Use in a University Music Library

In an effort to measure in-house use of music periodicals, a citation study based on bibliographies in theses and dissertations was conducted at the Indiana University Music Library. A total of 256 titles were cited, but only 30% were cited more than once. While the periodical literature cited by musicologists has a low rate of obsolescence, the periodicals cited by theorists and educators becomes obsolete at a rapid rate, making the rate of obsolescence for the field as a whole, fairly high, unlike other subject areas in the humanities.     

高校学报影响因子与其所属高校综合实力的相关性

根据武书连"2012中国大学综合实力排行榜"和2012年版《中国科技期刊引证报告》的数据,对综合实力排名前10位的高校(排名)和其学报影响因子按学科分别进行了统计学相关性分析,同时对全国自然科学、人文社科类高校学报影响因子与其所属高校的排名进行了统计学相关性分析。结果表明,在一定条件下高校学报的影响因子与其高校排名存在一定相关性,但总体而言,相关性不强。     

Humanities and Social Science Dissertations Published by University Presses: 2010–2014, Exploratory Observations

This study of humanities and social science dissertations published by university presses considers revised dissertations [RD’s] and their salient characteristics. Often dissertations in the humanities and social sciences become the sine qua non for advancement in academia; therefore, it is instructive to ascertain the ecology of dissertations published by university presses. Only revised dissertations [RD’s], and English language presses were surveyed from proprietary data provided by a North American book distributor [Yankee Book Peddler, Inc.] and were triaged for bibliographic aspects as well as for intellectual coverage. Disciplinary alignment, subject specializations, geographical distribution, as well degree of interdisciplinarity, and series publication highlight findings. Library of Congress Classification further articulated disciplinary orientation. Oxford and Cambridge University Presses, but presses are specialized by subject emphases. A significant number of RD’s are interdisciplinary, Eurocentric in subject and geographical coverage, historically oriented across LC Classes, and appear as titles in monographic series.     

Scholarly journal use and reading behavior of social scientists in Taiwan

This paper reports on a study of social scientists’ information seeking and use of scholarly journals to support scholarly communication and information needs. The goals of the study are: to explore the characteristics of information needs for social scientists; to discuss the importance of scholarly journals to social scientists and their information seeking and access means; to identify article reading patterns of social scientists; and to make comparisons between scholarly journals use and reading patterns of social scientists and other scientists in Taiwan and the USA. The author used a questionnaire survey and interview methods to investigate the information seeking, use and reading of scholarly journals, and article deep reading patterns of social scientists. The target population was social science faculty members from National Cheng-chi University in Taiwan. The article explores the characteristics of information needs for social scientists and shows that scholarly journals are important information resources for university social science faculty. Social science faculty in Taiwan use scholarly journals in multiple languages, mainly English, Chinese, German, and Japanese, which is different from scientists in the United States. In addition, they use electronic journals more than print journals. The number of article readings by social science faculty members was approximately 195 readings per year and nearly 440 h were spent reading per year. In contrast to scientists in the United States, the social scientists in Taiwan read fewer readings, spent more time reading, and read older articles. In addition, the study identifies article reading patterns of social scientists and proposes a six-type taxonomy of article deep reading. The study reports the scholarly journal use and reading behavior model of social scientists and shows there are some differences in scholarly journal seeking and use by social science faculty in Taiwan and scientists in the United States. Further studies of scholarly journal and electronic journal use and reading by social scientists across countries, subject disciplines, and languages of journals are needed.     

我国人文社会科学领域文献使用特征研究

[目的/意义] 分析各学科领域文献使用情况,可为图书馆开展信息资源采访工作和针对人才、机构等方面的科学评价工作提供数据支撑。[方法/过程] 以我国大陆地区主办的751种人文社会科学学术期刊为数据来源,以这些期刊在2004-2013年发表的131万篇论文为样本,以样本论文中著录的1 282万条参考文献为分析对象,对各学科文献使用情况进行分析。[结果/结论] 在人文社会科学领域,图书(34.03%)是使用率最高的文献类型,期刊使用率(33.95%)略低于图书使用率,其他类型文献使用率为32.02%。从学科角度看,人文学科学者偏爱使用图书,社会科学学者偏爱期刊,报纸和学位论文的使用学科差异性较小。从使用发展趋势来看,期刊、学位论文的使用率在逐年上升,图书使用率呈逐年下降趋势。     

人文、社会科学学科分类体系框架初探

对现行的《本科生专业目录》、《研究生专业目录》、《学科分类代码》、《中国图书馆分类法》以及《社科院目录》的学科分类进行了比较分析,并对照国外主要的学科分类体系的设置情况,找出国内现行人文社会科学学科分类体系存在的主要问题,由此阐明目前采用的人文社会科学学科分类目录及其分类标准亟待修正与调整。     

人文社会科学研究中文本挖掘技术应用进展

指出作为处理海量数据的有效工具,文本挖掘技术近年来在人文社科领域得到广泛重视。概述文本挖掘的相关技术和研究现状,介绍信息抽取、文本分类、文本聚类、关联规则与模式发现等常用的文本挖掘方法在人文社科研究中的具体应用,以拓展文本挖掘的应用领域,并为人文社科研究的方法创新提供新的思路。     

人文社会科学研究评价的国际经验研究

文章调查研究英国、荷兰、美国、日本的典型人文社会科学研究评价活动,发现这些国家人文社会科学研究评价具有高度制度化、国际化的特点,研究成果的原创性、研究的社会影响、研究的可持续发展性成为评价标准的主要内容,评价过程规范且由专家主导,计量指标只供专家参考,基于高水平代表作的外部评价是一种基本评价形式。这些经验对于建立我国人文社会科学研究评价体系,引导人文社会科学研究面向社会实践、面向国际水准、面向可持续发展,具有重要借鉴意义。     

对社会学最有学术影响的百家出版社分析——基于CSSCI(2000-2007年度)数据

基于CSSCI(2000—2007年度)数据中社会学期刊引文数据的统计,列出社会学领域内出版社图书被引频次较多的前100家出版社。通过被引情况,分析这些出版社对社会学术研究的影响。     

高校图书馆人文社科学科服务的思考和实践——以清华大学图书馆哲学学科服务为例

[目的/意义]人文社科和理工科的学科服务工作有各自的特色,高校图书馆如何做好人文社科学科服务值得探讨。[方法/过程]通过文献调研了解国内人文社科学科服务研究和实践,总结人文社科学科特点,重点介绍清华大学图书馆哲学学科服务实践。[结果/结论]长期存在的重理轻文的潜意识对人文社科学科服务依然有负面影响。人文社科学科服务实证研究偏少。清华大学图书馆人文社科学科服务践行全覆盖、个性化、重细节、有情怀的学科服务理念,从基础工作开始,扎实推进,支撑学科发展,扩大学科影响,促进人文思想的普及和传播。     

科技期刊增强科普功能建设面临的问题与路径思考

在新媒体时代,公众阅读兴趣与习惯发生变化,科技期刊若要进一步发展,则可以从增强科普功能的角度来探索有效路径。本文通过分析科技期刊增强科普功能的意义与优势,阐述当前科技期刊所要承担的社会责任。通过分析科技期刊在科普功能建设方面的不足,提出了相应的建设思路:突发事件时进行应急科普;对专业论著进行科普化解读;开设科普专栏;发行科普增刊;充分利用新媒体平台的功能;采用视觉化的科普方式;获取国家政策支持——以此实现科技期刊的经济效益与社会效益的双丰收。     

CASHL模式的主要特色和战略价值

作为教育部设立的公共服务项目,CASHL是构建我国人文社会科学服务体系的重要工程,有效发挥了繁荣全国哲学社会科学研究的助推器作用。CASHL模式有三大基本特色:1、非返还式非营利性文献传递;2、把建立国家级人文社会科学信息资源平台作为自己的使命;3、点面结合的三级联合文献保障结构模式。有五大战略价值:1、是消除全国高校人文社会科学"数字鸿沟"的有效途径;2、是信息资源共建共享运行机制的重要探索;3、是高校图书馆社会化服务的重要实践;4、是繁荣全国哲学社会科学研究的重要保障;5、是国家创新体系信息资源保障系统的重要组成部分。     

�ҹ���������ѧ���ݹ������Ҫ������Բ��о�

��[Purpose/significance] Scientific data is an important guarantee resource for scientific research and plays an important role in the research activities of research institutions and personnel. Effective management of scientific data can make it play a better role and serve scientific research. It is of great significance for the sustainable development of data management of humanities and social sciences to analyze the existing problems in data management of humanities and social sciences in China and put forward solutions.[Method/process] By analyzing the research status of data management related to humanities and social sciences, this paper summarized the main problems existing in the current management of humanities and social sciences in China, and put forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions.[Result/conclusion] China's humanities and social science data management has certain problems in terms of policy system, management system, construction content, infrastructure, etc. In the follow-up, we should promote the sound development of humanities and social science data management by improving relevant policies and systems, establishing a collaborative management system, strengthening infrastructure construction, and focusing on personnel training.     

高校学报本校科研人员发文情况探究--基于104个高校人文社会科学学报发文情况的量化分析

对104个高校人文社会科学学报的数据采集,探索现阶段高校学报的本校科研人员发文情况,并分析其对高校学报影响力的影响。研究表明：高校学报的本校科研人员发文比率在20%—60%之间;985或211高校、具有社科博士点高校学报更倾向于刊发本校作者的论文;从区域上来看,华东、华北、东北的高校学报更倾向于刊发本校作者的论文;CSSCI 和非 CSSCI 高校学报在本校科研人员发文占比上差异不显著;高校学报的本校科研人员发文占比并未显著影响学报的影响力。     

����ģʽ���鱨�����Ӱ��

通过对美国在第二次世界大战后科研模式变革给情报需求带来的一系列深刻变化的阐述,讨论科研模式与情报需求变化之间的关系。     

我国人文社会科学数据管理的主要问题与对策研究【本文涉嫌学术不端撤稿】

[目的/意义] 科学数据是科学研究的重要保障资源，对研究机构与研究人员的科研活动具有重要作用。有效管理科学数据能够使其更好地发挥作用，服务于科研工作。分析我国人文社会科学数据管理中存在的问题并提出解决对策，对于人文社会科学数据管理的可持续发展具有重要意义。[方法/过程] 通过分析人文社会科学数据管理相关研究现状，总结我国当前人文社会科学数据管理中存在的主要问题，并提出相应的对策建议。[结果/结论] 我国人文社会科学数据管理在政策制度、管理体制、建设内容、基础设施等方面存在一定的问题，后续应通过完善相关政策制度、建立协同管理体系、加强基础设施建设、注重人才培养等相关措施，以推动我国人文社会科学数据管理的良性发展。     

Access to European Online Databases

Describes access to European online databases and their capabilities. Databases covered include FRANCIS, a French database covering the humanities, the European Communities Databases, and the German national bibliography as an example of the humanities and social science databases offered by STN. The authors conclude that these databases have potentials for providing new information possibilities to students in European studies but that their utilization presents implementation problems that are unlike those found in other online databases.     

Nice vs. Necessary: Reference Collections in ARL Member Libraries

This study assesses the reference collection management practices and strategies used in the reference departments of academic members of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL). Librarians who participate in the management of the humanities and social science reference collections within ARL member libraries responded to an online survey about collection development policies, acquisition processes, collection use, weeding, and marketing of their reference collections. The results of this survey suggest that a large percentage of academic ARL member libraries are weeding their collections regularly, measuring use of the print and electronic reference collection, and moving decidedly toward electronic reference materials.