An NCME Instructional Module on Using Differential Step Functioning to Refine the Analysis of DIF in Polytomous Items

Traditional methods for examining differential item functioning (DIF) in polytomously scored test items yield a single item‐level index of DIF and thus provide no information concerning which score levels are implicated in the DIF effect. To address this limitation of DIF methodology, the framework of differential step functioning (DSF) has recently been proposed, whereby measurement invariance is examined within each step underlying the polytomous response variable. The examination of DSF can provide valuable information concerning the nature of the DIF effect (i.e., is the DIF an item‐level effect or an effect isolated to specific score levels), the location of the DIF effect (i.e., precisely which score levels are manifesting the DIF effect), and the potential causes of a DIF effect (i.e., what properties of the item stem or task are potentially biasing). This article presents a didactic overview of the DSF framework and provides specific guidance and recommendations on how DSF can be used to enhance the examination of DIF in polytomous items. An example with real testing data is presented to illustrate the comprehensive information provided by a DSF analysis.     

A Nested Logit Approach for Investigating Distractors as Causes of Differential Item Functioning

In multiple‐choice items, differential item functioning (DIF) in the correct response may or may not be caused by differentially functioning distractors. Identifying distractors as causes of DIF can provide valuable information for potential item revision or the design of new test items. In this paper, we examine a two‐step approach based on application of a nested logit model for this purpose. The approach separates testing of differential distractor functioning (DDF) from DIF, thus allowing for clearer evaluations of where distractors may be responsible for DIF. The approach is contrasted against competing methods and evaluated in simulation and real data analyses.     

Raju's Differential Functioning of Items and Tests (DFIT)

Nambury S. Raju (1937–2005) developed two model‐based indices for differential item functioning (DIF) during his prolific career in psychometrics. Both methods, Raju's area measures ( Raju, 1988 ) and Raju's DFIT ( Raju, van der Linden, & Fleer, 1995 ), are based on quantifying the gap between item characteristic functions (ICFs). This approach provides an intuitive and flexible methodology for assessing DIF. The purpose of this tutorial is to explain DFIT and show how this methodology can be utilized in a variety of DIF applications.     

An Odds Ratio Approach for Assessing Differential Distractor Functioning Effects under the Nominal Response Model

Investigations of differential distractor functioning (DDF) can provide valuable information concerning the location and possible causes of measurement invariance within a multiple‐choice item. In this article, I propose an odds ratio estimator of the DDF effect as modeled under the nominal response model. In addition, I propose a simultaneous distractor‐level (SDL) test of invariance based on the results of the distractor‐level tests of DDF. The results of a simulation study indicated that the DDF effect estimator maintained good statistical properties under a variety of conditions, and the SDL test displayed substantially higher power than the traditional Mantel‐Haenszel test of no DIF when the DDF effect varied in magnitude and/or size across the distractors.     

Detection of Gender-Related Differential Item Functioning in a Mathematics Performance Assessment

This study used three different differential item functioning (DIF) detection proce- dures to examine the extent to which items in a mathematics performance assessment functioned differently for matched gender groups. In addition to examining the appropriateness of individual items in terms of DIF with respect to gender, an attempt was made to identify factors (e.g., content, cognitive processes, differences in ability distributions, etc.) that may be related to DIF. The QUASAR (Quantitative Under- standing: Amplifying Student Achievement and Reasoning) Cognitive Assessment Instrument (QCAI) is designed to measure students' mathematical thinking and reasoning skills and consists of open-ended items that require students to show their solution processes and provide explanations for their answers. In this study, 33 polytomously scored items, which were distributed within four test forms, were evaluated with respect to gender-related DIF. The data source was sixth- and seventh- grade student responses to each of the four test forms administrated in the spring of 1992 at all six school sites participatingin the QUASARproject. The sample consisted of 1,782 students with approximately equal numbers of female and male students. The results indicated that DIF may not be serious for 3 1 of the 33 items (94%) in the QCAI. For the two items that were detected as functioning differently for male and female students, several plausible factors for DIF were discussed. The results from the secondary analyses, which removed the mutual influence of the two items, indicated that DIF in one item, PPPl, which favored female students rather than their matched male students, was of particular concern. These secondary analyses suggest that the detection of DIF in the other item in the original analysis may have been due to the influence of Item PPPl because they were both in the same test form.     

The Multidimensionality of Measurement Bias in High-Stakes Testing: Using Machine Learning to Evaluate Complex Sources of Differential Item Functioning

Test developers and psychometricians have historically examined measurement bias and differential item functioning (DIF) across a single categorical variable (e.g., gender), independently of other variables (e.g., race, age, etc.). This is problematic when more complex forms of measurement bias may adversely affect test responses and, ultimately, bias test scores. Complex forms of measurement bias include conditional effects, interactions, and mediation of background information on test responses. I propose a multidimensional, person-specific perspective of measurement bias to explain how complex sources of bias can manifest in the assessment of human knowledge, skills, and abilities. I also describe a data-driven approach for identifying key sources of bias among many possibilities—namely, a machine learning method commonly known as regularization.     

Test fairness: Examining differential functioning of the reading comprehension section of the GSEEE in China

This study investigated differential item functioning (DIF), differential bundle functioning (DBF), and differential test functioning (DTF) across gender of the reading comprehension section of the Graduate School Entrance English Exam in China. The datasets included 10,000 test-takers’ item-level responses to 6 five-item testlets. Both DIF and DBF were examined by using poly-simultaneous item bias test and item-response-theory-likelihood-ratio test, and DTF was investigated with multi-group confirmatory factor analyses (MG-CFA). The results indicated that although none of the 30 items exhibited statistically and practically significant DIF across gender at the item level, 2 testlets were consistently identified as having significant DBF at the testlet level by the two procedures. Nonetheless, DBF does not manifest itself at the overall test score level to produce DTF based on MG-CFA. This suggests that the relationship between item-level DIF and test-level DTF is a complicated issue with the mediating effect of testlets in testlet-based language assessment.     

Using DDF in a Post Hoc Analysis to Understand Sources of DIF

The purpose of this article is to describe and demonstrate a three-step process of using differential distractor functioning (DDF) in a post hoc analysis to understand sources of differential item functioning (DIF) in multiple-choice testing. The process is demonstrated on two multiple-choice tests that used complex alternatives (e.g., “No Mistakes”) as distractors. Comparisons were made between different gender and race groups. DIF analyses were conducted using Simultaneous Item Bias Test, whereas DDF analyses were conducted using loglinear model fitting and odds ratios. Five items made it through all three steps and were identified as those with DIF results related to DDF. Implications of the results, as well as suggestions for future research, are discussed.     

Assessment of Differential Item Functioning Under Cognitive Diagnosis Models: The DINA Model Example

The assessment of differential item functioning (DIF) is routinely conducted to ensure test fairness and validity. Although many DIF assessment methods have been developed in the context of classical test theory and item response theory, they are not applicable for cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs), as the underlying latent attributes of CDMs are multidimensional and binary. This study proposes a very general DIF assessment method in the CDM framework which is applicable for various CDMs, more than two groups of examinees, and multiple grouping variables that are categorical, continuous, observed, or latent. The parameters can be estimated with Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms implemented in the freeware WinBUGS. Simulation results demonstrated a good parameter recovery and advantages in DIF assessment for the new method over the Wald method.     

认知诊断模型题目功能差异检验方法的健壮性比较

在认知诊断模型中进行题目功能差异(DIF)的检测,目的在于保证测验的质量与效果。在以往研究的基础上,本研究重点探索在CDMs框架下,MH、LR、CSIBTEST、WObs、WSw、WXPD 6种DIF检测方法在Q矩阵是否正确设定以及有关DIF影响因素等条件下的表现。结果表明:在Q矩阵正确设定时,WObs、WSw和WXPD统计量表现要好于MH、LR和CSIBTEST方法;在Q矩阵错误设定时,6种方法都会出现Ⅰ类错误率膨胀和统计检验力较低的现象。相对而言,MH、LR和CSIBTEST方法的表现比较稳定,WObs、WSw和WXPD统计量的表现变化较大,WObs、WSw和WXPD统计量的Ⅰ类错误率和统计检验力的结果依然好于MH、LR、CSIBTEST方法。     

Decisions that make a difference in detecting differential item functioning

There are numerous statistical procedures for detecting items that function differently across subgroups of examinees that take a test or survey. However, in endeavouring to detect items that may function differentially, selection of the statistical method is only one of many important decisions. In this article, we discuss the important decisions that affect investigations of differential item functioning (DIF) such as choice of method, sample size, effect size criteria, conditioning variable, purification, DIF amplification, DIF cancellation, and research designs for evaluating DIF. Our review highlights the necessity of matching the DIF procedure to the nature of the data analysed, the need to include effect size criteria, the need to consider the direction and balance of items flagged for DIF, and the need to use replication to reduce Type I errors whenever possible. Directions for future research and practice in using DIF to enhance the validity of test scores are provided.     

DIF分析实际应用中的常见问题及其研究新进展

多等级计分题、小样本、匹配变量不纯以及DIF检验后的原因分析是DIF检验面临的常见问题,对多等级计分题目进行DSF分析,小样本情况下DIF检测的平滑方法,匹配变量不纯情况下采用MIMIC法,以及运用Logistic模型进行DIF检验后的原因分析是DIF研究中的一些新进展。对这些进展的分析使我们相信,多种检验方法的配合使用、运用DIF研究进行多维IRT框架下的潜在变量探究等,都有可能使DIF研究成为测量学未来的基础研究领域之一。     

Effect Size Measures for Differential Item Functioning in a Multidimensional IRT Model

This study adapted an effect size measure used for studying differential item functioning (DIF) in unidimensional tests and extended the measure to multidimensional tests. Two effect size measures were considered in a multidimensional item response theory model: signed weighted P‐difference and unsigned weighted P‐difference. The performance of the effect size measures was investigated under various simulation conditions including different sample sizes and DIF magnitudes. As another way of studying DIF, the χ² difference test was included to compare the result of statistical significance (statistical tests) with that of practical significance (effect size measures). The adequacy of existing effect size criteria used in unidimensional tests was also evaluated. Both effect size measures worked well in estimating true effect sizes, identifying DIF types, and classifying effect size categories. Finally, a real data analysis was conducted to support the simulation results.     

Assessing Differential Step Functioning in Polytomous Items Using a Common Odds Ratio Estimator

Many statistics used in the assessment of differential item functioning (DIF) in polytomous items yield a single item-level index of measurement invariance that collapses information across all response options of the polytomous item. Utilizing a single item-level index of DIF can, however, be misleading if the magnitude or direction of the DIF changes across the steps underlying the polytomous response process. A more comprehensive approach to examining measurement invariance in polytomous item formats is to examine invariance at the level of each step of the polytomous item, a framework described in this article as differential step functioning (DSF). This article proposes a nonparametric DSF estimator that is based on the Mantel-Haenszel common odds ratio estimator ( Mantel & Haenszel, 1959 ), which is frequently implemented in the detection of DIF in dichotomous items. A simulation study demonstrated that when the level of DSF varied in magnitude or sign across the steps underlying the polytomous response options, the DSF-based approach typically provided a more powerful and accurate test of measurement invariance than did corresponding item-level DIF estimators.     

Identifying differential item functioning in multi-stage computer adaptive testing

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of CATSIB (Computer Adaptive Testing-Simultaneous Item Bias Test) for detecting differential item functioning (DIF) when items in the matching and studied subtest are administered adaptively in the context of a realistic multi-stage adaptive test (MST). MST was simulated using a 4-item module in a 7-panel administration. Three independent variables, expected to affect DIF detection rates, were manipulated: item difficulty, sample size, and balanced/unbalanced design. CATSIB met the acceptable criteria, meaning that the Type I error and power rates met 5% and 80%, respectively, for the large reference/moderate focal sample and the large reference/large focal sample conditions. These results indicate that CATSIB can be used to consistently and accurately detect DIF on an MST, but only with moderate to large samples.     

Using a Taxonomy of Differential Step Functioning to Improve the Interpretation of DIF in Polytomous Items: An Illustration

The assessment of differential item functioning (DIF) in polytomous items addresses between-group differences in measurement properties at the item level, but typically does not inform which score levels may be involved in the DIF effect. The framework of differential step functioning (DSF) addresses this issue by examining between-group differences in the measurement properties at each step underlying the polytomous response variable. The pattern of the DSF effects across the steps of the polytomous response variable can assume several different forms, and the different forms can have different implications for the sensitivity of DIF detection and the final interpretation of the causes of the DIF effect. In this article we propose a taxonomy of DSF forms, establish guidelines for using the form of DSF to help target and guide item content review and item revision, and provide procedural rules for using the frameworks of DSF and DIF in tandem to yield a comprehensive assessment of between-group measurement equivalence in polytomous items.     

A Synthesis of the Peer‐Reviewed Differential Bundle Functioning Research

The purpose of this article was to present a synthesis of the peer‐reviewed differential bundle functioning (DBF) research that has been conducted to date. A total of 16 studies were synthesized according to the following characteristics: tests used and learner groups, organizing principles used for developing bundles, DBF detection methods used, and types of bundles that indicated statistically significant DBF in the hypothesized direction on multiple occasions. The article concludes with a list of suggestions to individuals who conduct DBF research. For example, effect size guidelines should be established for interpreting the amount of DBF in bundles of items assessed with simultaneous item bias test (SIBTEST), given that it is the most commonly used DBF procedure. This would reduce our reliance on statistical significance testing. General effect size guidelines are needed as well as guidelines for special circumstances like small sample cases. Other useful suggestions are offered as well.     

Application of Think Aloud Protocols for Examining and Confirming Sources of Differential Item Functioning Identified by Expert Reviews

This paper demonstrates and discusses the use of think aloud protocols (TAPs) as an approach for examining and confirming sources of differential item functioning (DIF). The TAPs are used to investigate to what extent surface characteristics of the items that are identified by expert reviews as sources of DIF are supported by empirical evidence from examinee thinking processes in the English and French versions of a Canadian national assessment. In this research, the TAPs confirmed sources of DIF identified by expert reviews for 10 out of 20 DIF items. The moderate agreement between TAPs and expert reviews indicates that evidence from expert reviews cannot be considered sufficient in deciding whether DIF items are biased and such judgments need to include evidence from examinee thinking processes.     

国际教育成效评价协会儿童认知发展状况测验项目功能差异分析

本研究旨在从一维和多维的角度检测国际教育成效评价协会(IEA)儿童认知发展状况测验中中译英考题的项目功能差异(DIF)。我们分析的数据由871名中国儿童和557名美国儿童的测试数据组成。结果显示,有一半以上的题目存在实质的DIF,意味着这个测验对于中美儿童而言,并没有功能等值。使用者应谨慎使用该跨语言翻译的比较测试结果来比较中美两国考生的认知能力水平。所幸约有半数的DIF题目偏向中国,半数偏向美国,因此利用测验总分所建立的量尺,应该不至于有太大的偏误。此外,题目拟合度统计量并不能足够地检测到存在DIF的题目,还是应该进行特定的DIF分析。我们探讨了三种可能导致DIF的原因,尚需更多学科专业知识和实验来真正解释DIF的形成。     

Development and Demonstration of Multidimensional IRT-Based Internal Measures of Differential Functioning of ltems and Tests

This article defines and demonstrates a framework for studying differential item functioning (DIF) and differential test functioning (DTF) for tests that are intended to be multidimensional The procedure introduced here is an extension of unidimensional differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) recently developed by Raju, van der Linden, & Fleer (1995). To demonstrate the usefulness of these new indexes in a multidimensional IRT setting, two-dimensional data were simulated with known item parameters and known DIF and DTE The DIF and DTF indexes were recovered reasonably well under various distributional differences of Os after multidimensional linking was applied to put the two sets of item parameters on a common scale. Further studies are suggested in the area of DIF/DTF for intentionally multidimensional tests.