调整教育视角 传授思维方法（续）

教学中如何传授方法?我们的基本观点是：通过传授知识传授方法。如果说传统的教学是以知识为本,或只有一个教学目标——传授知识;那么,当今的教学是以发展为本,除了教学目标具有综合性外．仅就认知而言,就有两个层次教学目标——传授知识、传授方法,进而转化为智能、创造力。且前者是手段,后者是目的。具体言之：     

调整教育视角 传授思维方法(续)

教学中如何传授方法?我们的基本观点是:通过传授知识传授方法。如果说传统的教学是以知识为本,或只有一个教学目标——传授知识;那么,当今的教学是以发展为本,除了教学目标具有综合性外,仅就认知而言,就有两个层     

探究式教学与传授式教学辨析

在对探究式教学与传授式教学进行了八个方面的对照分析之后,又从四个侧面来论证探究式教学与传授式教学的相互融合、相互渗透关系,力求通过探究式教学与传授式教学的辨析,纠正一部分人对探究式教学的片面理解,从而促进探究式教学的进一步实施。     

谈教学任务的多重性

“教学任务”是为实现教学目的而完成的任务,关于教学任务,目前已基本形成了一些共识:教学任务是传授知识;教学任务是培养学生的能力;培养能力比传授知识更重要;教学任务是传授知识与培养学生的能力的统一,等等。     

“自主探究一合作”体育教学法的理论分析

长期以来我国学校体育教学中,采用的教学方法是传授式教学和系统教学法。传授式教学方法助长了学生的体育学习依赖性,     

数学文化与数学教学刍议

在数学教学中传授数学文化有着积极意义,传授有多种途径,而教师的数学素养是传授数学文化的关键。     

慢慢绽放美育中的德育之花

在教学中不仅要传授学生的知识,还要传授学生素质教育方面的东西,在美术教育课堂中也是一样的。在教学中,传授知识时也要教学生德育方面的内容,文章介绍了笔者在教学中如何给学生进行德育教育。     

要把金针度与人

当今语文 教学上依然存 在着传授知识 多、传授方法少 的弊端。换句话 说,是注意了知识上的举一反三,忽视了晓以规律的“举三反一”。语文教学往往费时多、成效较少,其症结恐怕就在这里。 有鉴于此,笔者在语文教学中不仅传授知识,而且随时注意传授方     

对外汉语教学中的文化渗透

语言和化关系密切,语言教学和化传授关系密切。在对外汉语教学过程中,应时时注意进行汉化的有机渗透,将社会背景和化背景知识的传授贯穿于对外汉语教学的始终。     

数学教学应充分展示思维过程

著名的数学教育家斯托利亚指出,数学教学是数学活动(思维活动)的教学,而不仅是数学活动的结果——数学知识的教学.因此,数学教学不仅要传授数学知识,更重要的要传授获取数学知识的科学思维     

高师物理专业电磁学和电动力学课程整合与教学创新

讨论了高师物理专业电磁学和电动力学课程整合的必要性和可行性,提出了改革现有课程体系、教学内容、教学方法和教学手段的一些具体设想。希望为促进教学内容与教学结构的深层次改革,实现传统教学模式的创新,改善教与学的效果,提高学生的研究性学习能力和创新能力提供有益的参考。     

比较法在动物学教学中的作用及具体运用

比较法是生物教学中常用的逻辑思维教学方法之一,本文阐述了比较法在动物教学中的作用、比较法的常用类型、运用比较法的步骤。     

材料力学课堂设计和教学方法探索

本文从当前教学改革的角度出发 ,在原有材料力学教学体会和经验的基础上 ,论述材料力学课程容改革的思考以及教学方法的探索。根据材料力学的特点 ,详细阐述如何进行课堂设计和课堂教学     

关于高师普通体育课的跨栏跑教材与教学

文章从体育课的教学任务着眼,阐述了保留跨栏跑教材的必要性,并就如何合理安排这一教材的教学时数及其教学和考核的有关问题进行了探讨     

NOVELL局域网教学环境的规划与优化

本文以我校教学网为例,简要叙述了NOVELL局域网教学环境的规划与优化。     

"小群体教学"在普通高校公共篮球课中试验研究

随着篮球选项课的开展,传统的教学方法不能考虑到大学生篮球技术的个体差异,为了提高教学效果,对安徽理工大学04级篮球选项课的80名男生进行教学试验。结果表明:小群体教学效果明显优于传统教学方法。     

新课程视野里的教育实习:理念与模式的嬗新

素质教育与新课程改革对教育实习的理念与模式提出了崭新的变革要求,以实习生为学习主体的自主、立体、开放的“过程性”教育实习模式必将取代传统的一次集中的“环节性”教育实习模式,实现理念与模式的全方位嬗新。“全程基地导师制”实习模式是我们基于新课程理念与当前国内外教育实习现状提出的一种新的构想。     

HOLOCAUST AWARENESS AND EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATES

Experimentation in Holocaust education began in American schools in the mid‐1970s. After construction of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., the subject gained momentum. The last two decades have seen continuous development. In five states, Holocaust education is required at all school levels; in sixteen others, it is highly recommended. Serious teaching of the Holocaust started in earnest only long after World War II, when the horrors were at a distance and survivors started breaking the silence. Only then did systematic research begin. Teaching about the Holocaust developed as a result of Holocaust consciousness and of the growing feeling of its relevance to American culture. Such instruction also developed against a background of ongoing public debate concerning the Holocausts uniqueness, a controversy that has found its way into various teaching programs.     

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND ABSTRACT SYSTEMS IN EDUCATION

A bstract .  In this essay, Benjamin Endres examines how teaching is caught between the ideals of formal, systemic institutions, on the one hand, and the ideals of more intimate or personal relations, on the other. Endres uses Anthony Giddens's account of "abstract systems" and "pure" relations to suggest that the tension that teachers face is not only the result of opposing ideologies or philosophies of teaching, but it is the product of conflicting undercurrents in modern social and economic life. Although there is no simple solution to the ambiguous and contested status of teaching, Endres points to two examples of how the interpersonal dimensions of teaching may gain recognition and support by the institutional system of schooling: research on the effects of class size and legal guarantees for individualized educational plans in the area of special education. He concludes by emphasizing the particular challenge of cultivating interpersonal relations for the most disadvantaged students.     

THE USE OF LEARNING PROFILES IN ASSESSMENT AND IN THE EVALUATION OF TEACHING

This paper reports how individual students respond to a nine‐week course in plant anatomy using two teaching techniques: self‐instruction and group interaction.

Students vary widely in their responses to teaching by these techniques. Over the four years of the study (1975–78) four major patterns of response have emerged. These are described as learning profiles. The profiles are composed from curves depicting the attainment of individual students, measured in seven weekly assessment tests given during group sessions. The assessment tests measured performance in four capacities, based on Bloom's criteria, viz. recall of knowledge, comprehension, application and short‐chain problem solving. Learning curves for each of these four capacities were obtained for each individual student. Other variables, e.g. general ability, age, sex, anxiety, motivation, time spent etc. were also determined for each student.

The purpose of the course is to train students to solve problems in plant anatomy. Although strategies for solving long‐chain problems were not practised in groups, the component skills used in their solution were practised in the weekly test items.

From the profile types — i.e. the patterns of individual response to the teaching ‐ it was possible to make some prediction about performance in the final examination, although this examination was predominantly one to test capacity to solve long‐chain, multi‐step problems.