Sport in sozialer Verantwortung

Taking responsibility and creating social justice—in view of current social developments, e.g., the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities or the influx of more than 1 million refugees in 2015—this demand is also becoming increasingly louder in the context of sport: different types of sport should help to solve social problems or to prevent social imbalances. To date, however, the assumption that sport can do justice to this task is empirically almost untenable. This article provides an introduction to modeling the topic of sport in social responsibility for the sport pedagogical discourse and presents action and research practices as well as research objectives using the example of a socially effective youth sport in school, clubs, and social work. Two research projects provide an example of the scientific contribution that sport pedagogy can make by examining approaches to sport-related social projects and their effectiveness. The evaluation of the WiO-Fit project was able to show how appropriate sport programs can “lure” socially and educationally disadvantaged youth who can be guided into appropriate coaching and counseling services, according to the individual problems outside of sports. The research results of the social project Gobox show the central role that intergenerational relationship management and language play when it comes to increasing the commitment of youth who would otherwise turn away from sports. This article not only highlights the potential of sport pedagogical research in this field, but also provides suggestions for interdisciplinary cooperation and research practice.     

Training als Verflechtungsgeschehen

The contribution is based on praxeographic observations of volleyball team’s training processes. We suggest to reflect on the training processes as practices in which more knowledge is used than the practitioners themselves are aware of. It becomes clear in this perspective that the competencies to participate are developed by the participants mutually enabling each other to do so. Competencies are therefore to be understood as constitutively relational and cannot be ascribed to isolated individuals. Their training takes place in socio-material arrangements of successively complex exercises in which the structures characteristic of the game and the respective competencies are addressed and practiced in various, barely reflected techniques calling on dispositions generated before. In these arrangements, the players learn to deal with the urgency and possibilities of interaction. Through experience, they develop an embodied, preconscious sense for the game which enables them to adjust to complex gameplay as a team even under enormous time pressure. At the level of linguistic articulation and awareness, however, training is often rationalized by methodologically individualistic (action-theoretical) or holistic (structuralist) assumptions so that the implicit knowledge mobilized in the training practice remains largely unreflected and is instead reduced to explicit components in the respective reflective training procedures.     

Sportliches Handeln als Handlungsmodell

German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research - Die Ausführungen sind um folgende Thesen zentriert: (1) Sportunabhängig erarbeitete psychologische Methoden und Erkenntnisse haben...     

Ressourcenorientierung als Paradigma sportwissenschaftlicher Forschung

A variety of causes are responsible for a lack in promoting movement in German nursing homes. In this regard, research on resources holds the promise of a lasting capacity to act and should therefore be understood as a paradigm of gerontology of sports. The purpose of this paper is to make a contribution to theoretically and conceptually based approaches for operationalizing resources that promote motor abilities. Methodologically, different instruments are demonstrated that are able to assess the theoretical constructs “movement acitivity” and “influencing factors” as a basis for the subsequent analysis. Finally, a model that identifies resources is presented. It focuses on different personal and environmental factors as well as their interdependencies influencing the movement activity. The model analyzes resources and barriers to everyday movements. In this way, fundamental theoretical points of reference for research activity are shown.     

Der Sportwissenschaftler als Unternehmer im Wissensmarkt

Creative ideas are the driving force behind knowledge production, the producers of which are generally domesticated at universities for the purposes of ensuring the methodological credibility of the knowledge produced, in order to minimise the impact of chance in the creation of new knowledge. The status of producers is determined by indicators designed to simulate the demand for knowledge, precipitate a quantitative and qualitative comparison of elements which are not comparable, and establish legitimacy for the means of control used. Furthermore, incentives for competitive sport research and the symbolic recognition of scientists via sport practice play a particular role for knowledge production in sports science. In order to compensate for the practical world’s unwillingness to pay for sports science expertise relevant to competitive sport, the German Federal Institute of Sports Science (BISp) functions as a simulator of demand for knowledge generated by universities, while the Institute for Applied Training Science with its services exclusively available to umbrella organisations limits the range of incentives to produce (competitive) sporting knowledge. Sports scientists are thus faced with a market situation which favours routine research and standard methods, creates legitimacy at a central level, does not necessarily tackle actual issues faced by (competitive) athletes, stimulates demand for monitoring services, and all in all leaves monoculture-driven gaps which could most likely only be avoided by advocating and applying individual scope for action throughout the research ethos.     

Vielseitigkeit als Ausbildungsstrategie im leistungssportlichen Nachwuchstraining

This paper presents an excerpt from a comprehensive study on the concepts of long-term athlete development. Following a qualitative research methodology and using a hermeneutic-reconstructive procedure the purpose of this paper was to gain insight into expert youth sports coaches’ understanding of the two main trajectories leading to elite performance: early specialization and early sampling. Analysis of the transcribed interviews suggests that the training strategy is primarily the result of a complex decision making process. Additionally, coaches perceived a trend towards early specialization which conflicts with existing considerations of long-term athlete development. The results of this study provide an opportunity to understand the subject of diversification in youth sports and to raise awareness for the problems of practitioners.