共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
2010年,应新疆维吾尔自治区党委外宣办邀请,俄罗斯科学院远东研究所副所长、高级研究员、经济学博士、教授安德烈·奥斯特洛夫斯基先生和俄罗斯科学院远东研究所政策研究中心高级研究员、 相似文献
8.
2010年3月28日,由中国新疆维吾尔自治区文物局与美国南加州宝尔博物馆联合主办的"丝路奥秘——新疆文物大展"在美国洛杉矶宝尔博物馆开展。最大的展厅内,一位身着旗袍的中国女孩坐在古筝前,轻拢慢捻间,《高山流水》缓缓流淌; 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
12.
2012年5月的一天,夜幕降临,贝宁中国文化中心聚满了从四面八方赶来的当地居民。约20时许,武术散打短期培训班结业表演开始,随着《男儿当自强》的音乐响起,几十名男女选手轮番登台表演,台下观众喝彩声此起彼伏。在贝宁首都科托努,贝宁中国文化中心就坐落在一个古色古香的院落里,大门是一座典雅的中式牌坊,显得格外醒目。这里经常举办演出、展览、讲座、书展、教学和电影放映等活动,吸引着越来越多的贝宁人前来接触和了解中国文化。贝宁功夫学会1993年成立,现在已有3000多名成员,中国功夫已经 相似文献
13.
Cultural Capital 总被引:9,自引:0,他引:9
David Throsby 《Journal of Cultural Economics》1999,23(1-2):3-12
Economists traditionally distinguish between three forms of capital: physical capital, human capital and natural capital. This paper proposes a fourth type of capital, cultural capital. An item of cultural capital is defined as an asset embodying cultural value. The paper considers usage of the term cultural capital in other discourses, notably sociology after Bourdieu, and contrasts these with the proposed usage in economics. The relationship between cultural and economic value, upon which the economic concept of cultural capital relies, is explored, and the possible implications of cultural capital for economic analysis discussed, including issues of growth, sustainability and investment appraisal. The paper concludes with some suggestions for further theoretical and empirical research. 相似文献
14.
全球化、文化研究与中国学者的文化策略 总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6
当今时代 ,全球化已经成为我们无法回避的一个客观存在 ,而且正在日益影响波及着我们中国的文学研究和文化研究。我们甚至可以说 ,我们现在已经处于一个全球化的时代 :经济全球化、金融全球化、传媒全球化 ,甚至有人已经注意到了文化上可能出现的全球化趋势。① 毫无疑问 ,全球化这个现象决不是少数专家学者躲在书斋里杜撰出来的 ,也不是新闻媒体肆意炒作出来的 ,而是一个不以人们的意志为转移的客观现实 ,而且经济上的全球化所带来的后果必然会反映到文化等相关领域里。随着中国加入世贸组织的实现 ,这种迹象已变得越来越明显。经济全球化… 相似文献
15.
正这几年,每次往返老家浙江浦江,笔者总会去嵩溪村走走看看。嵩溪村是中国历史文化名村,现今有千余户人家、3000多人。在这个很大的村子里,笔者找寻并感受遗存千年的民间文明。千年沉浮,遗世独立浦江有民谚:"浦江无高山,出在嵩溪鸡冠岩。"鸡冠岩在浦江东北部,形势险峻,树木葱茏,素有"浦江第一名山"的美誉。鸡冠岩南麓有一个依傍 相似文献
16.
一条海上丝绸之路串联起东亚文明。2016"东亚文化之都"花落宁波,并于4月15日举行盛大的东亚"非遗"展,向世界展现独具魅力的东亚非遗文化。展会以"海丝之路"为创意点,以"保护文化遗产,促进文化交流"为主题,展示了中、日、韩"东亚文化之都""非遗"保护与传承的丰硕成果。 相似文献
18.
《Journal of Cultural Economy》2013,6(2):161-177
The central argument in this paper is that actor-network theory (ANT) does not do ‘cultural economy’ symmetrically: it has had a lot to say about economy but much less to say about culture. This rejection of culture is ontological and epistemological: culture appears in ANT largely as an artefact of modernist thought rather than as an empirical aspect of agents' performances. And yet if ‘economy’ can be critiqued and reinstated as performative, so too can ‘culture’. To explore this, we focus on objects of concern that – unlike the financial markets that have formed the core of ANT-inspired thinking about the economy – are assembled by actors in and through what they themselves understand to be cultural materials, cultural calculations, cultural processes, cultural institutions. In such examples, ‘culture’ is continuously invoked and enacted by actors in constructing their actions, whatever critical sociologists might have to say about its ontological status. It seems paradoxical that a theoretical approach that makes sacrosanct the associations constructed by agents who assemble their own world, generally discusses ‘culture’ only from the point of view of critical epistemology. Bearing all this in mind, we argue that it is time for us to ‘reassemble’ the cultural. 相似文献